PC 1964-1965-1388~ 'l 2
1 ~-~ ' ~
,,~ RESOLUTION NO. 1388, SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTI~T OF THE CI'TY PLANNLY(3 C0IQQSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEO(
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1666 HE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Citq Plmalne Commiaion af the City of Aad-eim dld r~cMvs ~ v~dSed PetiHon foc V~daace
Erom E~RMAN Eo NEAL, 1G61 South Pounders Lane, Anaheim9 California, Owner of certain reai
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orangeti State of California, described
as Lot Noe 23 of Tract Noa 2722
; and
WHEREAS, the City Pl~-alag Commissioa did hold a public heodng at the City Hall in the City oE M~6elm
oa Oc tober 26 ~ 1964' et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notlce of sdd public he~rin` having been dnly giveo ~s required
by laa oed in eccordence with the pmvisiona of the Anahdm Mnniclpd Code, Ch~ptec 18.68, to he~e ~nd consider
evidatce for and ogeinet aald proposed variaace and to iovestigate and make Hading~ and recommendations Lt connec.
tlon theee~vith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due laspection, investiQatioa, wd atudy m~de by itself ~od in ita be6alf,
and after due consideraUoa of all evideace ead rcpocts oHered n said hearln~, does $nd aad deteemine t6e followia~
facts:
1. That the petiUoner cequests a vedance Erom the Ae~helm Mnniciptl Code: Section 18„24,.030(5 )~o permit
the use of a pnrtion of the existing req~ired garage for access to room additiono
2. That there see e:ceptioael or extr~otdinary drenmsUaces or conditlons appllceble to tht propeety tevolved
oc ta the inteaded use of the property that do not opply geaenilq to the pmpe~ty or class of nse in the ~~me viclnity
and sone.
3. Thet the reqnested varl~ace is necasary for the preservation aad enjoymeat of a subataatld property dQht
pouessed by other peopecty in the seme viclnity and aoae, end deaied to the property in questton.
4. That the cecnested variaace wlll aot be matedelly detrimental to the pnbHc welhte or injnrious to the pao~
eRy or impmvemants in such vidnity and zone in which the propeRy is located.
,... 5~ That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition~
Vl-G -1-
~ -----~
_... . z~ :.. . _,,.xF. . .
: ~ • .
; ~ ~
~ f ~f
~
c NOW, TEiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mel:eim City Planaing Commlasion does hereby graat subject
{ Petitton for Vadance, upon the followin c~-didons which aee hereb found to be a aecessa
g y ry prerequisite to the pm-
posed we of the subject pe+~pecty ia order to peeserve the aafety and g~lneral welEaro of the Citizees of the City oE
Aa~hdm.
F le That sub~ect property shali be developed substanti~ily in accordance with plans and
s specifications on fite w~th ±he City of.' Anahe:my marked Exhibit Noo 1, provided however, that
~, the haliway be afuliy enclosed hallwayy as required by the Bsi;ding Codeo
THE FOREGOIIQG RESOLUTION ia signed and eppeoved by me this 5 of November, 1964e
~ ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY P ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
CRETARY ANAHEIlN CdTY PLANNING COMMISSION
S3'!s?E Og r~t r~?i*ir~! )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CiTY OF ANAHEI6[ )
I~ I~eK~'~~; Secrdery oE ths City Pleaaiag Commission of the City of Maheim, do heceby cedify thet the Eott-
goiag ceeolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commtssion ofthe City of Aaahdm, held oa
October 26' 1964~ at 2:C~0 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COI~IISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gaue•r9 lAungalt, Rowlando
NOES: COA~YIISSIONERS: Not~eo
ABSENT: COhaIISSIONERS: Perryo
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto aet my 6aad thia 5th day of November, 19640
RESOLUTION N0. 1388
V2-G
SECRETARY ANAHEDH CITY PLANNING COIdMISSION
_~
a
f
,~
1
~
?s
J~