PC 1964-1965-1397. ,-
t ) ~~~
r RESOLUTION N0. 1~~+ SERIES 1964-65
iI
A RESOLUTION OF THE Cl'fY PLANNING COMMLSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF 64-65I 49 OF BEA PROYED
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0.
WEiEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Meheim did initiate a verified Petition for
StateSOffCalifornia,CastdescribedpinPExhibittuA"Qattached heretofandarefer edutoYhere~inaase~
though set forth in full
Property oaned bys Edwin Jo Erickson, 800 Pine Ridge Knoll, Fullerton, Californiao
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public headng at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim oa
October 26' 1964~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public headng having been duly given es requlced
dence fordend egainet sa dipr posed reclessificedon~end to investigate ~ nd make find ngar end erec ~~~-a.caons n
conaectioa therewith: end
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, inveetigetion, and study mede by itself and in its behelf,
e~d efter due consideretton of all evidence and reports offered et seid headng, does fiad end determiee the folloaL:g
fects:
1.Thetthe P:anning Commission p:.oposes the reclas~ification of the above described
oropertv from the existing R-A9 Agricultural, Zone to establi:h an existing service station
as a conforming use in the C-19 Zoneo
2. Ih;at an amendment to the General Plan is deemed unr.ecessary9 because the size of the
parcel proposed for rec:assification would not generally affect the City's policies in this
areae
3o That the present uce of subject property is a service station within 75 feet o a
single family residencee
4e That the existing use was eatablished while subject property was under the jurisdict on
of the County>
5e That the existing dQdication for Brookhurst Street and Katella Avenue is not to
ultimate widi;h and na addi±ioaal dedication is recommendede The additional dedication would
theeproperty,line~. ~Theha~ditionalededicationtsh uldbesobtained~atbsuch timetasnthe pr perty
is redevelopede
6. That subject property does not have concrete sidewalks on the corner at this t mee
The sidewalks should be constructed at such time as the existing facilities are remodeled or
when the property is redevelopeda etition.
7. ?hat no one appeared in opposition to subject p
's
~
_l.
Rl~ A ~
3 ~
~
• 1
3
i
a
-.. ;.-, _._..r.. .,~...:,-~-.::. ~..~ . ~
- - --~----~. ~- ~.~:.v:.;~a44N,~:7-a.,Ma;;~.,e~% . :
; Octobar 7, 1964
~ #8
_~' - '~
`^ ~
. EX~-II~3~'~ `~A„
LBGAL'D~SCRIP'fION FCE2 DI37ttIG? W1P q36
,~ .~..,
'1'ho Eastor2y l65 faa! of Lho SovtAarly ib~ fa~t ~. tna scu~s+uass quarzer vs Lnv
Southpaot qwrter o£ tM Southw$t quartor o! Soction 19~ ?orrruhip 4 South, Ranga
10 arst~ in f.ho Raaeho Los Coyotaa, as sham on a Wp :acosded~in Hook 51, pnQa 10 of
Ltiscallu~eou~ 1Raps, reco=ds ot Osu~q~ County, Calitosnl.a.
B~ccepting t1w 6a~t.asly 40 Peat lyinp xithin tM right o! May o!~ &ookMu4t Straat
~nd tho 5outhorly 40 ~~st lyinq witt~in~ the zight o! way ot 1Cat.~lYa Aventa.
Aloo oxcapting therefrom that portion desaribed as 4ollo~as .
8eyinnit-~ at th~ intassection of tha contsr lina of Brookhurat Stroot and Ka4olla
Awnuei thanco Nortn 0° 21' 08" ~ast alon9 eaid eontes lin~ o! 8:ookhurat Straat a
diaLance ot 63.80 feett thonce South 89° 38' S2" wtat, a diatancs oF 42 faet to the
beyinniny of a non-tangont curve~ concave Northwa4Lazly and having a radiua of 22 faet;
;hence Souttnwe~terly along said curva through a aantxal ~n91t o~ 89° 57' 3~" an axo
distanco o~ 34.y4 fe~t to a non~lanqor-t lirat ~-ance Sovth 0° 18' 43" Ea:t a dia-
tanc~ of 42 feet to a point in tM centar line of Ka'tella Avtnwl thanc~ Nozth
89° 41' 17" 8aat aionq said antes lina of Katolla Awaw to th~ point of Aeginning.
I
. `4~516171R~g .
I , ~,~~~ ~ ~o~~
~ • ~~t ~9~ ~"'"' .
v
~ A '
s~ R~,N~ ~ ~~tiy ~ i -~. . +
~~.,EOF:52UL~ • ~ n~ ~ ~ ~
~ ;
• b''~~.~. • ~
~ t~~ ~ ~
.
,
~
. . . ,
~
. _ . , ~
~
~ ~ '~ '
~
,
~ ~~ti
~~
~ NOW, THEREFORE, SE TT RESOLVED th~t th~ 1a~hNm Gty P'l~sela~ Qoadulon do~s h~by recommead
to t6e City Coundl oE the Clqr of An~6elm t}ut ~ubJ~ct PWtloa tor RklwiflwNoa b~ appeored ~nd, by w doin~,
'th~t Title 1&Zonia~ of th~ Anuhelm Munldp~l Codt be unanded to aclnd~ the ~bow de~crlb~d prop~ety hcm the
R-A, Agricultural, Zone~ and to incorporate said described property into the C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial, Zone, unconditionallyo
THE FOREGOII~TG RESOLUTION ie signed and ~pproved by n+e thia 5 of November, 1964 ~
1
CHAIRNAN ANAHEIM CITY II4d COMAlISSION
ATTEST:
J
SECRETARY ANAHEII~I CITY PLANNiNG COI~MISSION
STATE OF CALYFORNU )
COUNTY CF OR~1NdE ) ss.
CiTY OF ANAHEIl~t~~ )
I- 1Qr~iK~Cebg~ Seeret~ry of the City Plwda~ Commission of the City of Aa~hdm, do henby certify that the fo~-
QoinQ resolutloa was p~saed ~nd adopted ~t a meetin~ of the Ciry P1wda` Commb~ioa of the Clty ot An~6eim, held oe
October 26, 1964, !t 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the foUoain~ vote oE th~ members thaeot:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ailred9 Camp9 Chavos9 Gauer9 Mungall, Rowiand.
NOES: CONhqSSIONERS: Nonee
ABSENT: COl~6RSSIONERS: perrya
IIV WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuato ~st my h~nd l6is 5th day of November~ 19640
RESOLUTION N0. 1397 '
R2-A
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLAIiNIIiG COMMLI3ION
.~
i
,
_
:
:~
,
~
i
~ ._.._~~.y
~