PC 1964-1965-1434 J
1
' `
. !
1
RESOLUTION NOe 1434e SF.RiES 1964-ti5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING ODMIdISSION 6F THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RE~MN,ENDING TO THE CITY CDUNG_TL OF THE rITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PEf1TI0N FOR RECLASSIFICATION NOe 64-65-57 BE APPROVID
WHEREAS9 the City Pyanning Commission of ihe City of Anaheim did receive a verified
Petition for Reclassification from H'OUSTON Je NICKEN, '72i SoutF~ Velaze Street9 Anaheim9
CaliPornia9 OwnerY JAMES K, SCHULER, 914 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, Caiifornia, Agent
of certain real property si~uaied in the City of Anaheim9 County of Orange, State of
Californiay described as PARCEL 2a 'Ihe north 146a59 feei of the south 293a32 feet of the
east haif of the west half of the northwest quarter of ±he soutnwest quarter of Section 18,
Township 4 south„ Range 10 west9 in the Rancho Los Ccy~tes, as per map re;:orded in book
51 page 10 of Miscelianeous Maps, in the of'rice or the county recorder of said county
; and
V~HFREAS, the Ci!y Planning Commisslon did hold a pLblic hearing at the City Hall in
the City ox' Ansheim on Decembe~ 7,, i964, at 2e00 0`clock PoMa9 notir.e of said public hearing
having been duly given as req~ired by ::~w and i~~ accordance ~.Jith the ~ro~isions of the
Anaheim Muni:•ipal Codev Chapter 18,'r29 to hea~_ ,and conyider evidance for and against said
propospd rec:assifi~:ation and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in
connection therewith; and
WF:EREA."5, s~:,~ Cormni~:.ic~v ~rLer d::e ins~.e~:.~cr:y inves~iga;,.cr.y and study made by i!self
and in its ber,aif, and after due considerat:on of ai1 evidence and reports offered at said
hearing, does f ind and determine i:he fol io~r•ing f act s:
1~ That the petitioner proposes a re~lassifioaiion of the above described property from
the R~A, Agriculturai9 Zone to the R-3, Multip:e Famiiy Resideniiai9 Zone to establish a one
and two story apartment structure~
2e That thp Commission recommends to the Clty Co,anci:t that subject property be *eclassi-
fied to the R-2, Muitiple fiamiiy Residential, Zone based on the fact that j heavier density
would create uriduiy heavy traffic on one street •~r~,ich serves both the cul•-de-saced R-1
Streets to the east as weil as the deep lot~ on ~the west side of Velare Street and may develop
for muitiple fami.iy residen'tial useo F'urther that Orange Avenue which will receive this
heavy tra!'fic is presentl~ not deve?oped to +he fu~ll w:dth of a secondary highway>
3e That Generai Plan Amendment No~ 24 incorporating 1ow-medium density for the west side
of Veiare Street was adopted by the City Council on September 1, 19(i4~
4e That the proposed reclassifi:.ation of subjer,t property is necessary and~or desirable
for the orderly and proper development or the communityo
5a 7hat the proposed reclassification of svbject property does prope~•ly relate to the
zones and their permitted use5 Ioca:ly established in close proximity to subject property
and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the communitye
6e That the proposed reciassification of snbject property does not require dedication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said pr.operty does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are pa.rtially impx•oved to car:y the type and quantity
of traffic, which will be generat~d by the permitted uses, in acr,ordan:;e with the circulation
element of the General Plano ~
7e That 14 letters and a petition signed by 29 persons were received in opposition9
and that one person appeared in favor of subject peitiono
a
NOW9 THFREE~RE9 BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahexm ('ity Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassification
be approved and, by so doingy that Tltie i8-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipai Code be amended
to exclude the above desc*ibed propeity #'rom the R~A, Ag.ricuitural, Zone and to incorporate
said des~ribed property into the R~2y Multiple Family Residential, Zone upon the foilowing
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of
sub;ject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the
City of Anaheimo
1o That the ewner of subject property shali pay to the City of Anahe3m the sum of $2.00
per front t'oot along Velare Street9 for s±reet lighting purposes~
2o That the owner of subJect property shail pay to the Clty of Anaheim the sum of 15~
per front foot along Velare Street9for tree piar.ting purposese
3e That the r.ompietiun of these rec~assification proceedings is contingent upon the
granting of Variance No~ 16'7io
4o That a1i drive~Nays shaT:t be s minimum o!' 21 feeta
5a That a minimum vertical clearance of i4 feet shall be provided for a minimum width
of 2? feet and at coxner cut-off~<
6~ That an adeq~ate t~rn•~•aroUnd of 27 r"oot radlus or a hammer•-head be provided for trash
trucks and emergency vehic:es..
70 .Tnat Condiiion iJoso i and 29 above meniioned9 si~aii be compiied wiih prior i,o the time
that the B~ilding Pe_~mit is iasued or within a pe::iod o~ 180 days from date nereof9 ~rhichever
occu•rs first9 0~ such fuz•ther time as the Commission may granto
So That *he sidewalks and di•:iveways shail be instal';ed along Veiare Street, as required
by the City Eng3neer and in acc:ordance with standard pians and specifi~ations on Sile in the
office of the City Enginee:c~
9a That the c•urbs and gutters shali be repaired along Velare Street9 as required by the
City Engineer and in ac,:ordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Enyineero
l0o That ti•ash storaye a•reas sh:~'ll be prov3ded in a~coz•dance with appi•oved plans on file
with the of'fic:e o!' the Disecto•r of Pubiic Workso
llo That the owner of' subie~.t pruperiy sh~l'L p3y to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25000
pe.r dweiiing unit9 to be used fo•r park and recreation purposes9 said amount to be paid at the
time the buiiding permit is issued~
i2o That z ire hydrants shaT'1 be instalied as x•equired and determined to be necessary by
the Chief of the Fire Depa.r;.ment~
13o That a 6-t'oot masonry waii shal'1 be cnnstructed aiong ihe north, west and south
property lineso
14, That the rear and side N•aTls of the proposed carports shail be finished with exterior
building materials, tt~at enclosed storage cabinets of a minimum capacity of 100 cubic feet
shail be provided at the rear ~~vali of each carport, and that adeqvate bumper guards shall be
provlded to prote;;t the interior. ~a11s of the oarportsa
15o That subje~t property sha21 be deveioped substen•tialiy in a~co.rdance wiih plans and
specifications on fi~e with the Czt~y oi' Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos~ 1, 2y and 3, provided
howe~e•r, tt~at alI develonment be limited to one st.ory in height-
iha That Ccndition Nes, 4, ~, t>, R, 9, ~0, li, i3, and 14 abuve mentionedY sha;i be compl~ed
with prior to fina? building insper.•tiu~o
THE FOR~iOING RESOLUTION is :signed and approved by me this 17th day of December, 1964e
~"~~'' ~
,~,~, J `,~',,,,. ~, .~ ~ C .
ATTESTa CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CI PLANNING COMMISSI
~~~2~in~n/ ~~c~~ip/.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C3TY PLANNING OOMMISS'ION
STATE OF CALIFORMA )
ODUNTY OF ORANGE ) ssa
CITY OF ANAHIIM )
I9 Mn Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission oY the City of Anaheim9 do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed ?nd adopted at a meeting of the City Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on Decembex 7, 1964, at 2e00 0°clock PeM,, by the
following vote of the memhers thcreofs
AYESa COMMISSIONFRS: A11red, Camp, Munga119 Perry, Rowlando
NOFSa ODMMISSIONFRSa Gaue*o
ABSENTs ODMMISSIONERSa Noneo '
IN WITNESS WHERB~F, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of December, 1964,
l~~~%~ /~~r~
SECREfARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~MMISSION
Res. Noo 1434