Loading...
PC 1964-1965-1440i' , RESOLUTION N0. 1440. SERIES 1964-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIIVG COI~MISSIOH OF THE CITY OF ANAHEOd 1HAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 16'4 BE aRANTED :'i ~ ~~ ~~~ .~,, ~{ `~I :~ ~ ~~ WHEREAS, the City P7aaning Commission of the City of M~heim did receive ~ vedfiad PeBUon for Vedance fmm NEIL REITMAN, 1919 East Center Street, Anaheim, California, Owner of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Caunty of Orange, State of California, des~ribed as the South 250e3a feet, measured from the cente~r line of Cent~r Street, of that portion of i.ot 7 of Ariaheim Ext~ension, as shown on a map of Survey made by William Hamel and filed in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, California, a r,opy of which•is shwm in book 3, page 163 et seqa, entitled "Los Angeles County Maps", in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange County~ described as follorrs: Beginning at the southwest corner of said lot~ thence North 379a50 feet~ thence East 115050 feet~ thence South 379050 feet~ thence West 115e50 feet to the point of beginning~ EXCFPT that portion thereof included in the Street on tha South ; ~nd WHEREAS, the City Pl~nnin~ Commindon did hold a pub8c hnda` ~t th~ City H~11 ia th~ Clty ot AaahNm on December 7~ 1964~ ~t 2:00 o'clock P.M., aotlcs of ~dd pnblic h~~cia~ h~vla~ be~a duly {ivw v srqu'is~d by l~w ~ud !a acoord~nce wlUi the providon~ of the M~hsim Munleip~l Cod~, C6apbr 18.68, to h~ae ~ed eaadder u svidenp toe ~nd ~~ain~t ~dd propo~sd v~rl~mce ~nd to iavs~tlpte ~ad m~la tlndln~ wd recomm~adations in colm~c- tloa theeewithi ~ud . WflEREAS, ~~id Commioion, ~fter dw in~pectlon, iavntl~~Uon, ~nd ~tudy m~ds by lts~lf wd in lb Mhdf, ~ad ~itee due coe~idenUoa of ~11 evldence ~od report~ oifeesd u~dd h~~rla~, dos~ $nd ~ad d~Nemin~ th~ followin` facb: 1. Th~t the petitloner requerh ~ v~daacs feom the An~}-eim Mlualcipd Code: Section 18038. ~0(3) which r~quires that the atructurai height limit within 150 feet of any single faa~ily residential toned boundary shall not exceed one-half the distance fron- eaid buildinq or etructure to the zoned boundary, tq permit the estabiishment of a two-stOx~y office builditlq M1 sub~ect propertyo 2. That theee ~es ezceptlontl or e~tnotdln~ry drenmshaces or condltion~ opplic~ble fo the ptoperty involved or. M the iat,aded nse oi the Pcopeety th~t do oot apPly ~ea~nliy to the Peopuly oe clui ot a~e ia !he s~ms vlcinity aad soaa ,j ~ ` 3. '1'~t tbe r~que~ted vad~ncs is aecesury tor the pre~e~ntlon ~nd ~nfoym~nt ot ~~t~ntl~l P~~Y ~[bt po~se~~ed bq oth~r Propeety ia ffie same vicinity ond :one, ~nd dealed to the Ptopeety ia 4ue~tlon.. 4. Th~t t6e reqa~sted variaace will aot be mnted~lly detrim~ntd to the pnbllc wslf~te oc ie~aclons to ffie piop eRy or impmvemenh in such viciaity wd aoae in wWc6 the ptapetty is loc~ted. 5. That one person appeared in opposition to sub~ect petition. ~* .. ~. V1-d • -1- : . ~ ' . ~i. ; , . ~i ,::.. , `a . . ~ ~ ' fA+ ~',t f ~i "±~~1 ~,, e . - . ~ MIM ! . ' . ' Y ~'W ' y ~ I : • ~ .,~ ~ ~~, 1 .}~F . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . ~ . . 1.'~~j:~ ~ ~4~.'a'.:} , i . ~... ~ .~~ . ~ . . ,. td7~Y., :y,i#. . .. 4,~J!..,:.' ~ 7 ~ ~ 'y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED th~t the M~hdm City Pl~naine Commiuioa doe~ herebq ennt subject Petltlon foc Vad~nce, npoa tM foqowla` ooaditlon~ ehich ~ce hereby foaed to be ~ neee~sary Prete4uisite to t6e peo- posed ose of tM snbJ~et propeety in wder to preserve the s~fety ~ad eeeent welhn of the Citis~es of the City of M~hNm. :. That the si4exa:ks shai: be inst3i':ed along Center Street, as rsquired by the City Engineer and in a~cordance NitA standard pians and spQCifications on file in the office of the City Englneero 2o That the driveways shali be :n~ta::ed aicng Center Street, as required by the City Enyineer and in a;,cordance with standa:d p;ar,s and specif:cations on file In the office of th~ City Engineer. 3. That tra~h siorage areas sha.: be provi3ed in accorda~ca Hlth approved plans on file with the offi~e ot the Directcr of Public 1loikso 4o That ±his Vaz:an,e :s granted s~bjec', to the comp:e±lon of Reciass:fication No, No. 64-65-60. ~ S. That al; ai= c:onditioning faci:it:es sha;l Da p:oper:y shielded f:om view from abutt- ing streets. 6. That sub~ect p:operty ~hai: be deve:oped subs!ent,isi:y in a;;cordance with plans and sp~,.iticat:ons on fi~• w:.tA th~ City of M aheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. 7e That Condition Nos~ I, 2, 3, and 9o abovs mentionedo ahail be complied with prior to r'inei bullding inapection. 'THE ~'OREOOII~iG RElOLUTION !~ ~lpi~d ~ad ~ppee+r~d by m~ tW~ 17th day of Dewe,i~r~ 1964. i ~K/~ . piAIltMAN AMAltEDI CTfY II~IG CONIQ~IOM ATTEb'f: SECRETARY ANAHEDI G'1`Y PLAIfNII~G COMIiL1SI0N S'1'ATE 01~ CALIIrORIM ) covx~nr or ow-xaa ) ... cnyr o~ ~x~tsn~ ) I~ MD.,Ka~~wrw S~aKary ot th~ Gty Plwale~ Comml~~laa ot t6~ Gqr ot M~hNo~ do ha~br oNtily that tL~ lo:w plai eNO1nWa wu Pu~~d ~ed ~dopt~d ~~ m~tla~ ol eh~ Gqr Plmda~ Commis~lan o! tti~ dq M M~6~im~ had m D~o~mb~s 7~ 1964~ ~t Z:00 o'olod~ P.M., by W~ ~ollowlo~ vob o~ tlu m~mb~cv tha~oi: AYEi: Cd01Ii310D1ERS: Ailr~d, Cemp~ G~u~r, Munq~ll~ P~rry, Rowl~nd. 110t1: COW1qt01~ttRS: Non~. A~ISN1': COIOIfatIOl1ERS: Non~. II~ IIT1~1E~ wftEREOF, I 6avn h~ato.K my h~nd ehls 17th d~y of D~c~mb~r~ 1964. Raaownaa~ xo. ia4o v~a )~~~,~c..~~ aacn~r~r ax~taa~ crnr ~a caammox .~. ~n ~ ~, ~ i ~. i ~} 1 m ' ~~.~ - -- . . . .. ._.