PC 1964-1965-1453- ~ .
~ ~ ,
RESOLUTION N0. 1453, SERiES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COA~MISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOM~ttEND1NG TO THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETl1TON FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-65 gE APPROVED
WtiEREAS, the City Pl~anin~ Comelaaion of the Citq of Ana6eim did recdve a vedHed Petitioa for Recl~ssigca
tioaEroa WILLIAM AND ORA Ra SMALL, 1632 West Ball Road, Anaheim, California, DONALD L~ AND
KATHLEEN E. BAUER, 13642 Tahoe Street, Westminster, California, and JOHN AND DOROIHY Me
CHRISTOPHER, 7450 Junillo Avenue, Canoga Park, California, Owners~ JAIu~S EMMI, 1808 East
Comiconwealth, Apartment 102, Fullerton, California, Agent of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, Coun~y of Orange, State of California9 described as the South 100
feet of the West 180 feet of Lot 24, Anaheim Investment Company's Tract, as shown on a map
thereof, recorded in book 7, pages 33 and 34, Misceilaneous Maps, records of said Orange
County~ the South 300000 feet of :ot 24 of Anahe:m Investment Company's Tract, as per map
recorded in book 7 pages 33 and 34 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county
recorder of said countyf EXCEPT the south 100s00 feet of the west 180000 feet thereofs
ALSO EXCEPT the east 338072 feet thereof
; ~od
'~ WHEREAS, the City Planniag Commission did 6old • public heada` at the City Hdl in the City of Aaahelm oa
Dec ber ~, 1964, at 2:00 o'clodc P.M. aotice oE ~dd public he~dng h~vlna been duly givea ~s cequired by
lea an in accoedaace aith We provislons of We An~heim binaicip~l Code, Chapter 18.72, to 6eor ~nd consider avidence
tor and dast add ptoposed reclusi$c~tloa ~ud to iavestl~~te wd ¢dce fiadin~s and recommend~Uoas la connaction
theeewith; ~nd
~~
WHE1tEAS, said Commiuieo, ~tter dne ietpection, lnve~tiptlon, ~ad ttudy m~de by ltselE aad ia ib oeh~lf, oad
a8er due coaaideretion of all evidence and eepoet~ ofte~ed ~t ~~id headng, does find aed detetmine the Eollowin~ f~cts:
1. That the petitloaer propo~es ~ reclu~iHe~tion of ths abovs dNCribed peoperty from the R~A9 Agricu1tura19
Zone to the R-39 I~uitiple Family Resfdentiel, Zone io establish a forty to sixty unit
apartment complexo
2~ That the proposed reclassification is in conformanca with the General Plarn
3„ ~~~ the proposed reclasslEic~tion oE ~nbJect proQedy ls aecessuy aad/or desinbl~ lot the ocd~tly aad pco-
per developmeat ot the community.
4~ '-'h~t the propossd ceclu~l8catloe of ~nbject pcopecty doss proPerly rsl~te to the soae~ and t6eir peimitted
uses loc~lly e~t~bli~hed ia elo~e proxfmlty to ~ab)~ct pcopsrty ~nd to the sones ~nd their permitted uses gena~lly e~t~b
lished throuehout the community.
5. That the pro~~sed reclassification of sub~ect property does require dedlcation for
and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut
upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted usesy in accordance with the circulation element
of the General Plan.
6. That the Commission recommends to the City Council that every effort be made to
allow the palm tre?s located in the parking area of sub,~ect property on Palm Lane to remain,
but the petitioner shall resoive with the Engineering Department9 the best location for
the curbs, gutters, and sidewaiks in or~er to maintain the proper street width and still
preserve the palm trees in their preeMtt Iocation as stipulated by the petitioner.
7. lhat no one appeared in opposition to sub~ect petition.
Rl-A '1'
~
_, ~
, • .._... ~
:~
~ --
NOiI~ Tt~RFFI-0RE, BE IT RF~LVID tha± the Anahe:m City Pian~ing Commission does hereby
Tecommend to tne City Councii of the City o"r rlnaheim that subject Petition for Re~lassiiication
be a~proved and9 by so do;ng9 '.hat T~tie ':8-Zcni;ig o~ the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended
to exc:ude tte above dascribed prope:ty irom ~he R-A~ Agriculturaiy Zone9 and to incerporate
said described p:ope:ty ia!c the R-39 Mu:;.ipie Famiiy Hesidential9 Zone, upon the foliowing
conditions Nhith are hereby fosnd to be a ne_essary prerequ:site to the proposed use of
subject proper~y in c=de= to p:eserve tne ~sfe1y and gEneral H•e'Lfare of ihe Citizens of the
City of Anaheim,
; Tha: the awne:s of sLbje,:t proper'y si~a:: deed to *he City o: Maheim a strip of :and
thirty :eet in w:dth, °rcm the cer.ter ~ine ef the s*_reet, along Palm La~ie Southy for street
widening purposes.
2e That s:seet imF.*ovement pians sha:i be prepared and ali engineeriny requirements of
the City o: Maheim along Paim Lane So:;th and Pa:m Lane East., ~uch as curbs and gutters, side-
waiks, s.reei g_ading and pav?ng, drainage fa:iiit:e5y or other appur*enant wcrk shall be
comp:eted as requi:ed by the ~ity Engineer and in accordar.ce ,~ith standard pians and specifi-
catio~s on fi;e in the ofiice oi the City Eng;neel; or that a bond in an amount and form sat-
isfaciory to the City of M aheim shaii be posted with the City to guarantee the installation
of said engineer~ng req~uirements,
3e ?nat the odn~s of subyect prcoe:ty st~ail pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of S2v00
per fron: iaot a~a~g Palm Lane South9 :o: s*:eet lighting purposes~
4. That *he owners of s•:bject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15a
per f~on* foot a:c.ng Pa:m Lane South and Palm Lane East9 f'or tree pianting purposeso
5~ ;nat trash storage areas shaii be pzovided in ac~ordance xith approved pians on file
with the o~fice o: the Director o~ Pubii~ Works~
6~ that fire hydrants shail be instaiied as required and dete~mined to be necessary by
the Chie.•' cf the Fire Departmente
7a 2hat ihe arners cf s,:b~ect property sha:i pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of S25o00
per dwei:ing unit, to be used ior park and re:reation p~rposes, ~aid amo~nt to be paid at the
time the bui:ding permit is is~ued~
8.. That drive.rays shali be a minimum widin or 2i feet~.
9.. That a minimum vehi::e clearance of 14 i~eet shail be provided for a minimum width of
'Z1 cee+ ~~~ 3! ^n.ne~ r•~4-~CCe
i0. That Condition Nose :, 2s 39 4 and ;29 abcve men~ioned9 shali be complied with •witt:in
a period of :80 days rran date hereof, or such further time as the City Council.may grante
li. Yhat Condition Hos~ 5, 6~ and 7, above mentioned9 shali be compiied with prior to
final bullding inspec!ion.
12. That the o»~ners of sutject proper:y shaii deed to the Clty of Anaheim a 3-•fcot over~
hang easement along the east baundary of subjec; propertya ~••
TI~ FORH~II~'i RESOLUT;ON is signed and
ATI'ESTa
SBCRETARY ANAHQiI CITY PLANI~LTt~G ~10iISSION
S?ATE OF CALIFaRNIA )
WUNTY OF ORAlGE ) ss.
CIrY OF ANAHELY )
approved be me s i h day of December9 1964~
CHAIRi~AN ANAHEIM CITY ANIVII~ WMMISSION
I, Mn Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim9 do hereby
certify that the foregofng resoiution was passed and adopted at a meet:ng of the City Planning
Commission of the City of Maheim, heid on December 7, 1964y at 2s00 0'clock P,Moy by the
follorving vote of ttn ~embers thereofs
AYESt COiWISSIOtiH~Se Allred, Camp, Gauer, kungally Perry, Rowlande
t~AES: Cd81ISSI0NFRSt None.
ABSII~II'a COYYISSIODiHiS: llone.
IH MITl~SS MHHt~F, I have h~reunto set my hand this 17th day of December, 1964e
~
F
~
~
~
~
~
Res. No. 1453
Li~~~~~'L~'2~iG`Q/
SECRff!'ARY ANAHQ CITY PLANNING OOMMISSION