PC 1964-1965-1489Tz
RESOLUTION N0.- 1489, SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CTfY PLANNWG C0IUQSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEAN
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 41 gE DENIED
WHEREAS. the City pl~nninQ Commis~ion oE the Citq oE Aa~heim did receive a veri$ed Petition for Conditional
Use Pe~mitfrom ROBERT W, AND LOUISE Ma KRATZ, 1252 North Brookhurst Street~ Maheim, California,
Owners of cer.tain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as Lot Noe 28 of Tract No. 2197
; ~ad
WHEREAS. th~ Ciey Pl~aain~ CommiWoa dtd hold ~ pnblic heain~ ~t the Citq H~11 in the Ciry of Aa~heim oa
January 18, 1965~ at Z:00 o'do~1c P.lt.. notlce of ~dd public hearlna h~vina beap duly ~lv~a u required by
l~w ~nd Ih ~ccord~ecs with th~ proviUm~ of th~ Aa~helm ll~oaidpd Code, Ch~pla 18~64, to he~e ~md con~idee mvidsnce
foe ~nd aQ~inst ~dd pcopoud coadttion~l nss ~nd to lnvatipt~ imd m~lct Sndlnis ~ad es~ommend~tioa~ la conaectlon
thsnwithi ~nd .
N~HEREAS, ~dd Comml~doa~ ~itsr dn~ in~p~ctlon~ invMtiptloa~ ~ad ~tndy mads bq itsalf ~ad ia ih bsh~lE,
~ad ~tt~e dn~ oon~id~ntloa ot W wld~ae~ ~nd r~porti oEhnd ~t sdd hMein~, don gnd ~nd d~emiae ths 5ollowla~ f~ch:
1. Th~t tlie propo~~d n~e !~ pcop~dy oo~ fe+r whtch ~ Catditlond U~~ Peemit U~nt6adsed bq tWs Code, to wit:
eatablish a commerciel office ir~ an exieting reaidence.
2o That the proposad use will adverssly affect the adjoining land uses and the.gr.owth
and davelopment of tha aroa in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site propoaed for the use is not adequate to allow the
full develapmant of the p~ropoaed use in a manner not detrimenLal to the particular area nor to
tha.paace~ health, safety, end general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Maheim.
4. That an~~ permitted signs in the use, if approved, would have a.datrimeatal affect on
ths adJ',oining-s:~ig:a Camiiy residential usos already established.
9,~ That at the pr~sant time none of•the.adjoining property owners are interested in the
development of their properties for aimilar usos, either individually or collactively.
6. That seven peraona appeared.end petitions signed by 88 persons were received in
opplsition, and that on~ peraon appeared in conditional approval of subject petition.
C1-D -1-
.r
~ ~ ~
• +~ ~.~ ,
~
~
NOW, TEIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED th~t th~ Aa~helm City Pl~aniae Commiulon doe~ h~nby drnq wb~~ct
PWtion foc Coaditlond Ui~ Pamit on the buU ot the afoesmeatioaod fiedfn[~.
TSE FOREGOIIQ~ RFSGLUTION i~ ~i~ned ~ad ~ppeowd by ms~thl~ h day of January, 1969.
. • ~ ~
~ CHAII2MAN ANAHF.AiI C LANNII~Td CO':NMISSION
ATTEST:
/OZ~t.~.e/ .
r
SECRETARY ANAHEAt CITY PI.ANNIIia COlOSLS5I0N
STATE OF CALIFORN~A )
COUNTY OF ORANdE ) u.
CITY OF ANAHED[ )
I~ Ann Krebs r. S~cntaey oi t6~ Gty Plroalae Cammiuioa of the Ci~r of Aa~heim, do heesby ceetity th~t ths fora
~oia[ ~olnUon wa pn~~d ~ad ~dopNd ~t ~ mNtin~ of ths Citq Plnmin` Comai~~ion of th~ City of M~heim, hald ~
January 18, 1965 ~, at 2:00 o'clodc P.M., by tbe tollowin~ wts of ths mem6en theceof:
AYES: COIOIISSIONERS: .•Allred~ Camp, Gauer., I~ungall, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COIOQ33IONERS: . Nose.
'AHSENT: COAU~IISSIONERS: None.
II~ WiTNggg yiHF.REOg~ I b~ve here~mto s~t my h~nd t6f.~ 28th day of January~ 1965.
SECRETARY ANAHEDd C1TY PLANNIN(i COlO~QSSION
RESOLIJIION N0. 1489
C~D • -~ .