PC 1964-1965-1547• >
-
.. _ .
~.
. . ' t ~ ~ }
RESOLUTION NO
1547~ SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY PLAlRQING COMIdSS10N OF THE CITY OF ANAHFD1l
;?ECOMMENT.S'.fitC+''t7 THE CITY CG'JNCIL OF T:i'a~'. CITY OF ANAHEDI THAT
PETTfION FOR RECLASSIF~=;+TlC:S iv0. b4-65-20 BE DEIiIED
WHEREAS, the Citq Pltmning Commission of t6e City of Aaa6eim did initiate a verif ied Petition for
Reclassification on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as
though set forth in full
; aad
WFIEREAS, the Citq Planning Commisalon did hold a pybllc 6eadna at the Citq Hall in the Cit~ of Aad-eim oa
March 1~ 1965~ at 2:00 o'clock P.bl., notice of eaid publlc hea~iag having been duly Qivrn aa reqnired
by laa end ta accordaace wlth the pmvistons of the Anaheim Mnaicipal Code, C6~pter 18.92, to hear and coaeidsr evi-
dence for ead against aeid proposed reclesei6cetioa and to investigate and make 6adings end tecommead~tioaa ia
oonnection therewith: end
WHEREAS, seid Commiasina, eRer due inapection, investigatlon, and stndy made by itself aad in its behaif,
ead aher due coasideration oE all evideace md reporte oHeced at said hearing, doea Hnd and detern-Ine the folloalag
fects:
1.Thatthe ~ity Planning Commission proposes a reclassification of t}ie above described '~y
property from the R-A, Agricultural, R-1, One Family Residential, and C-0, Commercial Office, ~j
Zones to the G 1, General Commercial, Zone. :
2. That Area Development Plan No. 8 was prepared to recommend a feasible method of ;;
providing secondary access between Iris and Palm Streets for lots fronting on Ball Road. ~
3. That the Commission initiated a study for approximately 2,700 homes fronting and
siding on arterial street~ and highways in the City to determine the best and most practical ~
uses of said homes.
4. That after innumerable continuances of subject petition, in order that the "front-on ~
side-on" study might be completed, the Planning Department has advised the Commission there
would be some delay in the completion of the study due to the fact that an inadequate staff ~
made it necessary to curtail further progress on the study, and that no specific daie could ~
be given for the completion of the study.
5. That the Commission deems it necessary to have the completed study presented to them
before any definite recommendation can be made to the City Council.
6. That due to the innwnerable delays property owners of the properties under reclassi-
fication consideration have been unable to attend all hearings, and in order to properly notify '
them at the time the "Study" is completed the Commission deems that subject petition be ~
disapproved, but upon completion of the "Study" a new Petition for Reclassification should be ~
initiated to duly notify all interested persons. 3
~
F
if.(
'I
5
~7
. ~
3
Rl-D '1'
_,.:•-N
. _ . ._ _ i;
; ~ ~' ~ ~ ..
, TOu PLMMING DEPAR'IMENf ~i ~H 1BIT tt J~ » .
FRC1LIt RIGHf OF WAY AI~ID LAND SECfION 1, .~
RHs LBGAL DESCRIP?ION FOR RECLASSIFICATICN 64-65-20
. PARCEI. ONEi That portion of the North half of the West half of the Northwest quarter ~
of the Northeast quarter of Section 22, Township 4 South, Range lp Nlest, in the Rancho
~ San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as ehown on a Map recorded in Book ~1~ page 10 of )Aiacel-
laneous Mapa, records of Orange County~ California, described ac~~olloNa~ ', ~
i ~
• Beginning at the Northeast carner of the North half of the West half of the Northwest ;
quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 22i thence Soutfi:0° 14' 30" East ,
along a portion of the East line of said North half of the West half of the Northwest :
quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 22, a distance of ZS6.50•feet; thence ~ ~
South 89° 55' 35" West along a line parallel with the Northerly line of said North :
half of the West half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section '
22, a dietance of 245.00 feet to an intersection with the East line of Lot 71 of ~?
Tract 2005, as shown on a Ulap recorded in Hook 53, pages 19 and 20 of ~[iscellaneoua ~:,
ldaps, records of Orange County, Californiaj thence North 0° 14' 30" West elong a por-, .i
~ tion of the East line'of said Lot 71, along the East line of Lot 70 and the Noxtherly '~~
, pralongation thereof a distance of 156.~50 feet to an intereection with the Northerly ~
' • line of the North half of the Weat half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast
,~ quarter of said Section 22; thence North 89° 55' 35" East along a portion of the
Northerly line of the North half af the We~ half of the NortFw~est quarter Qf the
~ Northe~st quarter of said Section 22, a distance of 245.00 feet to the point of
• beginning. '
Excepting therefrom any portion thereof lying Nithin Ball Road to the north of sub~ect
property. •
p,
PARCEL ?NfO: The East 75.00 feet of the North 166.50 feet of the;~lortheaat quarter of
,' the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section ?2, Tore~hip 4 South, Range '
l~ West~ S.B.B. $ A(. : ~ . '
Excepting therefrom any portion thereof•lying v+ithin Ball Road to the north of ',
sub~ect property.
,j.
1
i
.
~
, 3
.' ~
.
, .. "~ ~ i~~ t~
.
,~
~~
i
~
;t
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Meheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the CIty of Aneheim that oubject Petition for Recleasificetion be denied on the besis of the
aforementioned Eindings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLU'TION is signed end epproved by me this llt y of March~ 1965.
~
~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY ANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
i~ll'e•C~f/`Q/
SECRETARY ANAHEIlH CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann {Fa~Y4R~y. Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneh::m, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution wus pessed and edopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commission ofthe City of Maheim, held on
Mdreh 1~ 19b59 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred9 Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this llth day of March~ 1965.
i~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 1547
R2-D -?r
; y~.. _ :.a