PC 1964-1965-1570~ •
_ -. ~
y
RESOLUTION NO
1570~ SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING C03~YQSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
REC01~11ENDING TO THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEIbI THAT
PETTI'ION FOR RECLASSIE'ICATT^`, N0. 64-65-99 gg ~ppROV~u
WHEREAS, the City PlaaninQ Commlasion of the City oE Aaaheim did receive a vedfied Pttition Eor Reclassi8ca-
tionfrom the ESTATE OF AMELIA LENZ, 2301 West Crescent Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owner;
FREDRICKS'DE1/~LOPMENT CORPORATION, 524 West Commonwealth A•.~•„~e, Fullerton, California,
Agent, of"certain real,property situated in the City of A~aheim, County of Orange, State
of California, described as the East one acre of the South five acres of the Southwest
quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 7, Township 4 South,
Range 10 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as s!~own on a Map recorded in Book 51, page 10
of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Qrange County, California
; aad
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiseioa did 6old e public headng at the City Hall in the Clty of Maheim on
March 29~ 1965~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M. ~^_ace of sald public headng having been dulq givea ~s tequired by
lew and iu accordaace avith the provisions of We Meheim MuaIcipel Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear aad coosider evidence
for and ageinet said ptoposed reclassification end to inveaUgate and make 9ndinge and recommendatloas in connection
Werewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commiesion, a8ec dne iaepection, investigetion, and etudq m~ide by itself and io its behalf, aad
ager due considaation of all evidmce md reports offeced at said hearing, does find end deteemina t6e foli„aing facts;
1. 'I'hat the petitloaer propoaes e reclassi8cation of We above desalbed property from the R-A~ AgriCUltural~
Zone, to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to develop a two story apartment.develop-
ment.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in accord2nce with the General Plan.
3• Th~t the proposed reclessiflcation of subject property is neceasary and/or desirable lot the ocderly aad p~o-
pec development of the community.
4.Thet the proposed ceclasei9cation oE eubject propetty does peoperly relate to the zoaes and their peem;tted
usee locally established la close proximity to enbject propetty and to the sonea and their permitted uoea geaeraliy estab-
lished throughont the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject prcperty does require dedication for
and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut
upon streets and highways which are {~roposed to carry the type and quantity of traffic, vihich
will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of the
General Plan.
6. That no one appeared ln opposition to subject petition.
Ri-A
-1-
-~~~
. 1 ~ 1
N~YY, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVF~ that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend•to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for reclassification
be.approved ar~d,.by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Maheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above described property from the R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said
described property into the R-3, biulti{~le Family Residential, Zone, upon the following
conditions which.are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject
propert~ in order to preserve the.safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of
Mahe i.m.
1. I'hat the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Maheim a strip of land
45.feet in.width, from the center line af the street, along Crescent Avenue, for street widen-
iag purposes.
2. That.stree#..improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of
the Cit.y of.Anahe,im along Crescent Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading
and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be campleted as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the offioe
of the City Engineer; or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
shall.be posted with the City to guarantee the instailation of said engineering requirements.
3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Maheim.the sum of $2.00
per front foot.along Crescent Avenue, for street lighting purposes.
4~ That the owners of subject property shali pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15a
per fr.ont.foot alang Crescent Avenue, for tree planting purposes.
5. That the completion of these r.eclassification procee.dings is. contingent upon the
gr.anting of Va:iance No. 1693. .
6. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a 3-foot over-
hang easemen'c along the easterly boundary of subject property.
7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with within
a..period of 190 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
B. I'hat Lrash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office ef the Director of Public Works.
9. That the •owners of sub3ect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 525.00
per dHrelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the
time the building permit is issued.
10, That fire hydra~ts shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by
the Chief of the Fire Department.
11. That Condition Nos.R and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to
final building inspection.
12. I'hat sub,ject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications na file_with the City of Maheim,. marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
THE FOR~OING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me 8th day of April, 1965.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY ANNING ODMMISSION
ATTEST:
~; i~ ~~•~
SECRETARy pNAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~MMISSIQN
STATE .OF .CALIE3lRNIA )
ODUNTY OF ORAI~E ) ss.
CITY OF {WAHEINL )
I, Mn Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of M~heim, do hereby
cert3fy that the fore9oing rasolution was passed and adopted at a ineeting of the City Planning
Cammiss3on of the Gity of.Anaheim, held on March 29, 1965, at 2:00 0'clock P.M., by the
follcwing vote•uf the. membexs thereofs
AYES: OOMMISSIONFRSe Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Perry, Rowland. '
I~pESs COM4LLSS7ANFASs. None.
ABSENT: OOIdMISSIONERSs Allred.
IN WITNESS WHI-R~F, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of April, 1965.
/~S~~C./~
SECREfARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING OOMMISSION
Res. No. 1570