PC 1964-1965-1623!
~--.~:l-~~ -'" ~ _ _
t -
~ ~ I
~.! '_j
RESOLUTION N0. 1623~ SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY PLANNiING C010111SSION OF THE CITY OF ANAIIEiM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDI'fIONAL USE PERMIT NO.b4:L HE DENIED
WHEREAS, We City Plmda` Commiuion of the City of Ao~hdm did ccceive .,eri8ed Petition (or Condicional
Use Peemitfrom ANGELO AND ChRL ZAHY~ 1401 East 51st Street, Los Angeles, California, OwnersR
Ro#>ert Nlartin, 1881 Mitchell, Suitt 32A, Santa Ana, California, Agent, of certain real
Property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
es Parcel 1, the North 190 feet of the West 220 feet of the Northwest quarter of the North-
west quarter of the Northeast quarter of Sectior: 27, ToMnship 4 South, Range IO West in the
Rancho San Juan Cajon de Sant~ Ana~ Parcel 2, the Northerly 265 feet of the Westerly 460
feet of the Northwest quarter :f the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section
27, ToMnship 4 South~ Range 10 W,~et in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa AnaR Excepting
therefrom the North 190 feet of the "'ast 220 feet thereof
; and
WHEFEAS, the City Pl~nniag Commission did hold e public hecdag at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
IMay 10~ 1965~ at 2:00 o'dock P.M., notlce of said publlc he~rtng having beep duly eivea as required by
l~w ~nd in ~ccord~nce wlth tha provisioas oE the M~heim MunidFal Code, Ch~pter 18.64, to he~r ~nd consider evideace
for aod agdest s~id proposed condiUon~i use and to investigate aad m~ke fladings and recommendatioes iu conaection
therewit6~ aad
WtIEREAS, sdd Commi~sloa, ~ftec due inspection, investlg~tion, ~nd study made by itself ud in its behdf,
and atter dne coesidentioa of ~11 evidence ~nd ceports oEfered ~t sdd he~dn`, dxs fied and deteemtae the 6ollowiag f~cts:
1. 7'hrt the ptopwed use is propedy on~ tor which • Conditioanl ilse Permit is outhorisad by this Code, to wit:
establish a biilbnazd in the shape of a full-sized jet fighter aircraft for the advertisement
of an existing air museum in an adjacent citye
2. Thai. the proposed use does not qualify under the existing Billboard or Sign Ordinancee
3o That the prcposed use does not advertise or relate to existing uses generally
established in close proximity to subject property.
4. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth
and deveiopment of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to suhject petition.
Cl-D
-i-
~
i ~
~
~
~ -.~
c
a
u
~
~, }
~
NOW, TEtEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commieaion does 6ereby dmy subJect
Petition Eor CondiUonal Use Permit on the ba+sis of the aforcmentioned findinga.
THE FOREGOING RFSOLUTION is sig,eed and approv~ed by me.thia 20th day of May, 1965~
~ J
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIIYI CITY NING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
5~~r:C~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNiA )
CO1JNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIbI )
I~ Ann KrebSy Seccetacy oE the City Plsnnia~ Commission of the City of Maheim, do hereby cedi(y thet the Eora
going rcsolution wu pused and adopted at ~ meetiag of the City Plenaing Commi~sioa of the City oE qnaheim, held on
May 10 ~ 1965 ~ • at 2:00 o'clock P.bI., by the tollowiag vote of the membecs thereoE:
AYES: COAO~[I~SIONERS: Allred, Gaue:, Herbst, I~ungall, Perryf Rowland.
NOES: COI~SSIOPiERS: None a
ABSF.NT: CObIMISS'IONERS: Campe
IId WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto set my h~ad this 20th day of May, 1965.
RESOLUTION N0. 1623
C2-D
~,..
/'~~
SECRETARY ANAHEI61 CITY PLANNING COMAlLSSION
.~