PC 1964-1965-1672..; _
~,~~__.. _ _.. _.
0 ~~ '
RESOLUTION N0. 1672, SERIES 1964-b5
A RESOLUTION OF 1HE CITY PI,ANNII~fG COIOILSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIIiI
THAT PETITION FOR VARiANCE N0. • 1716 BE DENIED
~w FUTFL CORPORATION~110 0~ W~~ilshire Boulevard, LosiAngeles, Califor~nia,~~Ownerr of e tain
real property situated in the City of Maheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
es the north half of the northwest querter of the southr~est quarter of the nortM~-est quarter of
Section 9, Township 4 South, Etange 10 West, partly in the Rancho Los Coyotes and partly in the
Rancho San Juan Ca~on de Santa Ma~ as per map recorded in book 51 page 10 of Miscella~eous
Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county
; aad
WH~REAS, the Gty Pl~min~ Commis~ioa did hold a pnbSc heaeina rt the City }iall in the Clty of M~hsim on
June 21~ 1965~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said publtc he~eia~ h~vln~ beea dnly g~vaa u
l~nv aod 1n ~cooidnoe with the provl~lons of the Anaheim Muaicipal Corie, Ch~pter 18.68. to hear and oon~ider evt~ ce for
md a`ainst sdd proposed wri~nce wd to iavesH~ate aad make $ndlagi ~nd racommend~Uons in coanection thecewith;
and
WHEREAS, sdd Commiseioa, after due inspection~ investi~~tloa, aad smdy made by itself and :a its behdf,
and ~fter dne can~idacatioa of dl evldence and eepod~ offeced as ~dd hearLi~, doe~ find and dsteemina We follopia~
f~ctt:
1• ThK the Petitionec ed4uests a vati~nce from t6e M~hh~+im Mnnicipd Code: Sectioh 18.62.090(b-2) for
waiver of the maximum height of a sign (25 feet permitted within 300 feet of sinqle femily
dwellings - 30 feet inches pxoposed; and Section 18.62.090(b-4-a) waiver of maximum area of
a free standing sign~350 squaze feet permitted - 601 square feet proposed) to construct an
identification and changeable copy sign for a theater now under construction.
2. That the height of the proposed sign•would be detrimental to.the existing singie
fam3ly and multiple f.amily residents to the west, north and east of sub~ect property.
3. 'fhat the proposed free-standing sign~will be twice the size permitted by Code, and
would.be if granted, granting a privilege not afforded other developments in close proximity
to sub3ect property.
4. That the.granting of subfect petition would be setting a precedent .for similar requests
for waiver of the newly adopted sign ardinance.
5. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the ~ame vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
6. That no one appeared in oppositfon to sub3ect petition.
N0~9, THEREFORE, HE Tf RESOLVED tb~t the M~6eim City Plamia` Commis~ion does haaby denq ~nbJect
Petitlon for V~iwce on t6e buls of the ~6oremenUoaed 6adlep.
THE FOREGOIIPG RESOLUTION !s N~asd aad ~pprovsd by me thia lst July~ 1965.
1 ~
CHAiRMAN ANAHE01 CiTY P (i COYIOSSION
ATTEST:
%~~
SECRETARY ANAHEDd CITY PI,AN[JIIdG COYIQSSIdPi
STATE OF CALIFORMA )
OOUNTY OF ORAN(iE ) sa • •
CTfY OF ANAHEW )
I~ Mn ICtebs~ ~ary of the City Pl~nnin~ Commtsaton of the Gry oi An~hNm. dc 6enby catltq fh~t the fon-
eoina resolntlon w~s pused and ~dopted ~t ~ meetiu` oE t6e City Pl~mia~ Commission of the City of Aa~helm, held on
June 21 ~ 1965 ~ et 2:~ o'eloclc p,11„ by the 6oUowin~ wte of t6e m~mb~es thenof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Herhst, Mungall, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: C010iLSSIONERS: None.
~s~rr: coeottsstort~trs: None,
II~i Ii1TNESS WHEREOF. I Lavs 6aemto set a,ry haa~d this lst day of Jt~ly~ 1965.
>~OV LCiC/~1 /
SECRETARY AIQAHEnI CITY PLANNII~iG CO1011SSI0N '
RESOLtITIOH N0. 1672
VZ-D
.y
~ -;
-3::-;~~;
,::x
:>; ~;
.,w~.
~,;
O ~~