PC 1965-1966-1790,
RESOLUTION N0, 1"79U, SE:RIES 1965~6E~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIM~~ CQMMISSION OF THE C1TY QF ANAF-EIM
RECOMMENDING ~'0 THE CITY COUN~'IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHF:IM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIOt~ N0. 65"~?h"`~~ pE APPROVED
,,;~~;~x .
... ,1 •
;~
,i`,~ ~
~` ,
:, ~
;;I;`
~
;:t ~ ~
~ ' ~
A '
~}
.;~: I.
~'^~Y'.~` ~
f'ir, ~
l^I `
. ''a
1
~
~
,
~
,;
WHEREAS, the City plenoing Commisslon of the Clty of Anaheim dld receive a vedfled Petltlon for Reclessifica-
tion from ~~EiURGF NAKANIShII, et ~~ly IO2J7 Beacl~i k3c,ulevard, Stanton, California, Owners;
cCx~Rt~lNA~fEn 1~LVF.LOPEf?S, INCURI'0f2A1'EU, 19212 flamden Lane, Fluntington Beach, California, Agent,
of cex•tain ro~l properi:y ~tt,uated in the City ~f Anaheim, County of Oranye, State of Galifornla,
described as f~arcel 1: The WesL H,~lf of t:he Northeast, Q~i,~rter of I:he North~ast ~uarter of
Sect,ion 23, Townahip 4 South, Range 11 West, San 8ern.~rdirio E3ase an~l Meridian~ in the Ranc:l~c?
Los Coyotes, EXCEPTTNG TIIEREFROM, thE~ South Five (5) Acres
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Comtr~ission did hold a public hearing et the City Nall in the City of Anaheim on
Sept,ertiber 27, 1955, et 2:00 o'clock P.M, notice of said public hearing heving been duly •;iven as required by
law end in accordance with the provisions oE the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for and ageinst snid proposed reclassificetion and to investigete and make findings and recommendatlons in connection
' therewith; and
~
I
~: .
~7~~; 4,~
~i.%t,.; ~~
::r1r-
".y~„
WHEREAS, said Commission, aftec due inspection, investigetion, nnd study mede by itself and in its behalE, and
efter due consideration of all evidence end reports oEEered at said hearing, does Eind and determine the following fects:
1. Thet the petitioner prop~ ~es a reclessificetion of the above described property from the ~••Ay Agc ~c;ul t.tir~l
Zone t.o the R~••;s., Multip.le Fami~ly Re~ident.taly Zone to establ:ish a mobile hcme {:ark..
2•. That the proposed :•e~~laS;lEicaLion is in r~onjtirzr.tion with past amendment, No„ 13 to I.he
General P1 ~n..
i 3. That the proposed reclassification oE subject property is necessery And/or desirsble for the orderly and pro-
~ per developncent of the community.
i;: 4. That the proposed reclessification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their pe~mitted
, ~; uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generaliy estab-
lished throughout the community.
, _ 5~ That the proposed reclassification of sub,ject property does require ~ledication for and
stand~rd improvement oi' abutting si:.rerts because said property dne~~ r.elate
s~treets and h'ghways which are proposed to carr the t to and abut upon
e generated ~y the permitted usesy in accordance ;.ithypheacarculation elementfofythe1Genezal
Plan.
~ o~ That because the petitioner has submitted plans of development which encompass pro ert
wit.hin the jurisdiction of both the c; ties of Anaheim and Stanton the Ci.t of Stani,on p y
, submitted recommer~dations :ce2,tive to the water service, y Y has
element to ~,he City of Anaheim~ . 97'ading and drainagey ~nd circulation
~` 7~~ ~'hat three persons appeared in o
,,,t~ Sub:jE~F, ~etition. Ppositiony and i,hree letters were received in favor of
k-A -1-
r; . ., ' rr".:~::ml•'.
C
.
~. ~ '
`~
.~
;
~\ ~
,
NOW, 'I'}{EkI:COR~:, E~E 11' RF.SOL,VED thet the Anohelm City Plenning Commission doea hereby recommend
to tho City Councll of thc Clty of Annhoim thet aubject F~etltion tor Re~~laseification be eppmved and, by so doing,
thet Tltle 18-7,oning ot the Anehoim Munlcipel Code be amendad to excYUde the above dascrlbed property (rom the
R-A, Aqricultural, "l.one, ~nd t;o incorpc~rat.e said described property i.nta 1.he R-3~ Miiltiple~-
f~amily f2esidenkt~~l, Zone, uror~, t',n {ollawing condit:ions whlch are herc~by found ta be a necessarypre
req~iisi t.e lo the proposed u~e of subjeci. propc~rl:y in order to preserve the s~~t~ty ~ir.d yeneral
welf~az~e of the c.itlzens of t.l~e City of An~~heim:
l. T'h+~t Lhe c~wnet~s of ~;ubjer,t, ~~roperty shal.l dr,ed t:o the City of AnahE~im ~~ si.rip Uf l~~nd
63 f'eet, in w.{cil1~, t'rom the centerllnE~ of t:he atreetY ~1ong E3a11 Road,, i'or st.J:eet w.i~Jeninc3
pu~ E,oses„
^~ 'Ch,:,t vehirular ac,c.c~ss r~ght.s l:o Norwood Avenue st~all b~ dedicated ~,o {,I~E: Cl.i:y of Anal~eim
3~ 7'r~,,~ ~.i mociifte~.i r,ul.~~de•~,ac be provided aL the i.erminu, of Norwood Avenue, sub,ject l,o thc~
~~{_~proval of t,he City ~nr~inec~e„
~I„ 'Jh~.~~. st,reei, imF~rovement ~.~ians shall be prc.~pa.red and ~all enyineeriny reoutremcn~~ of the
~%it.y of' An+i}ieim alonq 13,~1i Road, sucti ,3s cru~s ~3nd gutters, sidewalks, street. g'radiny and pavinq,
c:II':ljfl.+ge F<ir„lities, or ol;he7• appu•rtenant vrork shall be com~Jeter~ as req~aired by lhe Gity
Finyineer and in ~+c~;ordanr.t~ Wj.th sf.andard ~,lans .~nd s~~eciPicati.ons on fila in t.he oi'fir.c~ of ihe
~%Ity i~nr~lneer; or t.hat a k~nnd Ir, :in 7f1101Ji11, and focro s~~ti~factory to ~i~e City ot' Anahetrn shall be
~~~steci tivith thn City to yuarar l~~ tF,e install~tion of s,~id eng ineeriny req~~.iiemc.=nts~
5~ "Ch.~l the nwners of subje~':t prope~~ty shal l pay to the Ci t.y o(' Anaheim t.l~e sum of' $~.UO
~e.r• f ron l. !'oot ~+lnng Ha l] Road, f'o1~ s treet l iyht iny purposes~
6.. Th;~t Che ownei•s of' :, ~bjt~r,t propert.Y shall pay to the Cit,y c~f Anahe)m the sum of 1~~ K,ez~
f t nnt loot ~~ lonc~ A~i11 F2o~ir~y f ur tree plant ing ptarposes.,
'7~ Th~t t.he drai.nnye sh:~ll be discha:rged in a manner satisfai,tory to the City Engi.neer,.
fiu '1'}iat t;r~nc-iilion Nos., 1, ,,, :3, 4y 5y 6 and "I, above ment.ioned, sf~all be cornplied with
with.in a pcriad ol' iR0 days Crom ~he d~ite hereof, or such further t.imc as the City Counr.il may
gr~inC.
9u That ~:ompletion oi' tt~ese Heclas:,if ication proceedings Is continqenC upon the grantiric~
of' CondiCional lise Pecmi~ No. 76:3~ ~
10„ '.lh~t :~ubje~:.t UroNerty sl~~~ 11 be developed suLst.antially in a~:;cordance w.ith plans ~and
s~er. if ica± ions or~ t' i le witl~ the Cit.y of Anaheim, rnarked Exh ibi t Nos„ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,~nd 6,
pravided., howev~~z, th~t a minimum 4••locC high masonry wall shall be constru~:ted behind Lhe rear
ol~ a 20~toot lands::;ipe~i setback on Ball Road prio:r to Cinal b~ilding inspection.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 7th da of October, 1965.
, \ ~ ~'.tivv ,~,~ .
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY , NING COMMISSION
~ I
i
i
~, ~
i I
t
i
~
~ I
~~
j j
T
% , .
" i A
~ alx.
~
~
1
~~; ,
N.; ~~_ '
[s!S .
ATTEST:
/ / ~ ~
/li `l.'C-.'s= = ' ~i1~L~'~i'--~~~
SECRETARY ANAFfii~IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIF~~RNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss~
C1TY OF ANAHF.IM )
I, Ann Kre~•s, Secretary oE tht City Plenning Commission of the City of /~rraheim, do hereby certify thet the Eore-
going resolution was passed end adopted at a mecting of the City P1e.nning Co:nmisaion of the City of Aneheim, held on
September 2?, 1965, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., b,y the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, ~auery Herbst, Perry~ RowlandY Mungall.
NQES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Camp.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my ttend this 7th d~y of OCtober, 1965,
RESOLUTION NO. 1790
R2-A
`/,~;, ~ . ;~-'i , .~. ~:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITX PLA~JNMG COMMISSION
-2-
~