PC 1965-1966-1792RFSOLUTION N0. 1`~ 92., SEf~I~S 19ti5 -66
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COh1MISSION OF THF.
F~ECOMMENDING TO'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A_.__,._..,. .,,,,,
PETITION FOR RCCLbSSIFICATION N0. ~5 66•~43 pE App~p~ED
~,; ~ ~ ..
;,~ 1 ~
~
I
~
~: ~
!
~.
i
I
,~~
;, .~
~
~
.I
~?'
;;;:,.
: ti~
~ .~~
.~
~,
:~;
,
,
~~' i
~~ ~" ~
i
~Pf,;~
,f ,,
;:~ ;
~~
+.•.~4
WH~REAS, the City planndng Commisalon of the Clty of Anaheim did receive e verlfl~d Petition for Reclassiflca-
tion from C)ONAL[) R ANU TRENL M„ ROTH, AMEFtICAN REAI;]'Y, 105~32 Kat.ella Avenue, Anaheim,
Ca,i.fornia, Ch~vners, of' cerlain real proFerty situ~t:ed in lhe City o( Anatietm, County of
Gr~inge, Stat.e of Californl~, described a, l,ot.s Nos~ 1 and ?_, ijiock li, oF the Lorelei Tr~ct
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Clty Hall in the City of Anaheim on
September 27, 1965. at 2:00 o'clock p.M, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
!ew and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for end against sAid proposed reclassification and to investigate c~nd make findings and recommendetiony in connection
therewith; and
2~. That ~he proE~~sed Tr~.la~:ssiri,:aCion is in ~~onf'ormance wit.t~ the Gene:al Plan.,
WHEREAS, seid Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its behalf, end
after due consideration of all evidence and repo~ts offered at said hearing, does find end determine the following fec,s;
1. That the petitioner propose~s a reclassification of the above descriUed property Erom the R•~: , Nu l:~tp l e
Family Resld~ntiai, Z~ne t.o ;.he ~:. Gener,~i Comme;:cia1, Zone ~o r~•:,tabil;;h ~:~eal estate
oPf ice~
~- That the prop~sed reclassification of sub~ect property is necessary and/or desirable for the orde:ly and pro-
per developnrer.t of the community.
`~~ That the proposed reclassification of subject property does ptoperly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally established in close p;oximity to subject property and to N-~ zones and their permitted uses generelly esteb-
lished throughout the community.
5. That the proposed rec:las~ifica±ion of subject propertv does require dedication for
and standard improvement of abutting streets because .;aid prcperty does z•elate to and abut
uF~on s~tr~eets and highways which are partial.ly irnproved to ~ar.ry the type and quantit~ of
traffic., which wi.l'i be oenerated by the permiti:ed uses, ~in accordance with the circulation
element of the General Plan.
6. That no one appeai•e~ in opposition to subject pei;ition~
~*1
~. ;
R-.A
-1-
,: - .
~
n
~
, ...
',, t
; E
, ~?
`:~ i
,
~
I
,
i
!
'~~
~
~
~
,
;
~
i
I
!~;` I
:~
., ~
~
r> I
~
NOW, 'CHERE:FORE:, E3E IT RF.SOLVED thet the Anal~elm City Plann+ng l:omm~~eton does hareby recomme~d
to the Clty Co~incll ot the Clty of AnAhelm that eubJect Petitlon tor Reclaealficetion be e~proved enJ, by so doing,
thet Title 18-Zoning of th^ Aneheim Munlclpal Code be emended to exclude the ebove described property from the
N-3, Multiple-Camfly Resid~±nti;~l, Zone, and to lricor•pc~rate said des;;ribed property into
the C~-1., General Commerci•~l, Zone, upon Lhe fol.lowing condltions which are hereby found
to bc~ a n~cessary preiequisite Co the pro~o5ed use of sub,ject property in o~•der lo presorve
the s~~fety and gene:al welfarF pf lhe citizens of the Cii.y oE Anaheim:
l, 'I'ha+: ~hr. owners ot' subje~~t prapexl.y shali deed to lhe City ot' Anaheim a].','~~foot radius
~,orner z~er.urn at Ltnc:oln Aven~~e ,3nd Bush Stceet.
Z~, xhat Lhe owners of suk~~e~:t pt•nperGy shai'L ~~~y to 1:he (:iLy o.C Anaheim the sum of 1~Q
per front fo~t aiang L.in~,o:in AvEmae and Bush StceeLY :'~r t~ee plant.ing p~_ir.pose~.
~. ~haL a b~litd~na pe.~•m~t, ~nd inspeclion be otatained on the exist.'ing alt.eratians whi.ch
shall be in c;onf~orman:.e tu Che Uniform Duilcitny Code as adopt,ed by l.l~~e Cily of' Anaheim~
~~ 'I~h~,t ~ondit,lon Nc,=,,, 1, 2<ind 3., above n~i~nt.ioned, shall be ~;omp:li~~d with within a per.ioci
of '~RU d,~ys f,om ~~ate h~~reof., or ~~uch f~.~rl.her. lime as the CiLy ~,ounc:il rn~~y qrant.
5,. 1'hat any air-con;iiLloning fa~liities provtded shati k,e prc~perly ~h,elded from view From
abutting sl:ce~!s, priur to fin,:il t~u~;~jing inspe~,tion.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this '~ -d~t oE Oc tober, 1965
~' r ~
/ ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY ANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ `
~i/~"'"- ~ / ~ L.-~ ~-l/~%
SECRETARY ANAHEIiN CITY PL.^.iJNING COMMI5S10N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR.4NGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, d~ hereby certify thet the fore-
going rezolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
September 27, 1965, at 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
AYES: CU6IMISSIONERS: Aliredy Gauer, Herbst. Pe.rryy Rowlandy h1unga1l~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None>
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~amp..
IN WITNESS WFtEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this 7th day of October~ i965~
G%~ -~.,,~ / ~~z..~ :-~~
-, ; SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITl' PLANNING COMMISSIOT'
j RESOLUTION N0. 1792
~ R2-A _Z. ~
~
~