PC 1965-1966-1838}tCSOLU'1'TON N0~ .~lFi3_ H, 5~:ries 196~G
A RCS~LUTION UF T~-iE Ci~'Y PLANNING (Xl-~1MISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAFIEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CI1'Y OOUNCII. OF TfIE CiTY OF ANAHEIM 'I'HAT
GENFRAL PLAN AMENDMF.NT NO„ G5 BG DISAPPROVED
. ~ ~i.l
;'
~~~ ~
\ '~
~
~
_ •~ ;
I
i
i
WWERGASy the City CUUncil of the Ctty of' An~-~heim did adopt a Gc~neral Plan
by Resolution No. 63R-R69, showinc~ thn general description ~nd exten~ of l~~nd
uses within the City ~nd indicating Lhe present belief of the Council as to
pos,ible f'uture devrlopment and redeveloF~ment of land wit.hin the Ci1:yj and
WHERF.AS, Lh~ City Plann;ng Commission o! t.he City of Anaheim dld rereive
a verified Petition for Recl~3ssii'ication No„ G5w66-~4~1y whic:h petition has
irnplications on pollci.es as expressed on saici Gencr~~l Plan~ and
WNEREASy in con,junctlon with the notice of the hearing on said reclassi-
Cicatlony notice was also given regarding the r,onsideration of an amendment
to the Gent~ral Plan in the gene.ral lor..atian and vicini~y of sub,ject prope:rty
of said reclasc;iFlcation= ,~nd
WF{EREASy the City Planninq Commission did hold pufilic: hearingr~ at the
Cit;y Hall in the Cit.y of An~3heim on Octobet• 1~ and November R., ~9G5, at 2:00
o'clor,k P~M~, notice of said publir, hearings having bec~n duly given as required
by law and in accordance wlth the prouisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to
hear and ~onsider evidencF for and agalnst said amendment to the General Plan
and said pxoposed Petition i'or Reclassif' icatlon to investigate and make f indings
and recommendat ions in connect ion therch i t.h; and
WF{EREASy s~id Ccmmi,sion ~E ter cille i.nspsction~ investi~ation, and study
made by it~elf and in its behalf and a}'ter due consideration of a11 evidence
and rt~ports offered at ~,aid hearinq., WES HEREBY FIND
1. That the present general description and extent of :and uses
in the aforementi~ned r~re~ adequately represents past and
c:urrent Clty Policies regarding possible future development
of' said genera i area, baunded by Brookhurst Street n the
west; a lina aE~proximately 40(1 feet south of Ball Ro-~d on
the north; a I ine a~prcximately 2~U feet east of Brookt~urst
StreeC on the F~ast; ~:n~i a line approximately Q00 fPet nor''
of Cerr:tos Avcnue c~n the so~~h.
2. That no eviden_~e wa< ~reser.,~:; at said hearinc ~vhi~.:h woulc.
justify the City P:.;nnirig Comr,~~ssi..,~ recommen~ a:~han~e
in the above-mentioned Folicies Lo t.l~e (''.ty C~; ~-,r1„
3.. Tnat Exhibit "A" of Genera; Pi-~~~ Amendment No 65 does not
constitute an acceptable al>,ernative to c:urrent policies
a~ illus+:rateri on the Gene.~ral PI an~
'._ '
~~ ~
j~
i
`,_..;
*
~ ~
?- j
,
`
~.f
,•`,
~
~•„~ J
NOWr TfIER~:FORE, E3E I'I RESOLVED that the Clty Planning Comrnis~ion of~ ~he
City of Anaheim daos hereby recommerid to thQ C1ty Council of the City of Anal~~eim
that sub,jer,i; Gc~neral Plan Amendment be disapproved on the basls oP ~:he aforementionecl
f~indings.
TH~ FOREGOiNG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me t:his 18th day of' November,
1965„ ~
, •~- :~ ,-.
I yr~
f ~ i`
~ ;1~
E ~
,;:`_ ? ';
i
: `;;
~ f:i
_ 1 IY.
\ 1 ^ !,.4~
~'
~ ~ ri
,i
I
I
~
i
~
I
1
~. ~
:~~
~,~ i _ ~I
I
i
i
ANAHEIM CITY -r1/ANNING C70MMISSION
AT'T E5 T:
.I:C ~ ~.~_~ ~ i"~ '~~~"/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CI'TY P1.ANNING ~MMISSION
ST'ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
OOUNTY OF ORANGE ) ;;,~
r,ITY OF ANAHEIM )
Iy Ann KrebsY Seci•etary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheirn
do hereby ;.ertify that the foregoing reso.lution 4vas passed and adopted at a meeti.~y
of the City P'1ann.ing Commissian of che City of Anaheim held on Novembei• 8, 1965
at 2t00 0'clock P,.~d„y by the following vote of the members thereofs
AYES~ COMMISSIONERSz Allred, Campy Gauer, Herbst., Mur~gall., Perry, Rowland~
NOES OOMMISSIONE~S: None~
ABSENT~ C~OMMISSIONFRSa None.,
IN WITNESS WHEREQFy I hdve hereunto set my hand this 18th day of November, 19650
~~ i . ~~
l/C/~~'! %~ !/ ;~~.iV--.~:.
SECRETARY ANAI~EIM CITY PLANNING ~MMISSION
Res~ No. 1$38
, . . ,~ ~:
~