PC 1965-1966-1844RESOLUTION N0,_... 184`~+ SERIES 1.965•-•66
A RESOLUTION ~~ THE CITY T~I.ANNiNG COMMISSION OF THE CI'1'Y OF ANAHGIM
Tf1AT PE1'TT(ON rOR CONpiTIONAL USE PFRMIT N0, ~.~, BE DENIf;b
i _. ~_ .~
.\ ~
~
~. ~
~
I
~
~i
~
, ~
; alx~
._.: i
~
1
.:-f?~~i
WFfERCAS, the City Planning Commiselon of the City of Anaheim did rr~ceive c~ verifled Petition for Conclitionol
Use Permlt from JU1.E5 I. 51GMAN, 226 5outh BPVerly Drive, aeverly F~1115, Californiay Owner;
UQNALI) E, PAREN'I'EAU, 11902 East 20Gth 5treet, L~~kewood~ C~~lifornia, Agent of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Ur~nge, State of C~lifornia, described
as the south 100,00 fc~et of the north ;~00.,00 feF~t of the east 225,.00 feet of the northwest
quartE+r of 5ection 23, 'Cownship 4 South, Ranye 11 West, in t.he R~ncho L.os (;oyotes as said
sec~ion is shown on a map recorded in baok 51 page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office
of the county recoz~dQr of s~~id county
; end
WF{EREAS, the City Planning Commission clid hold a public he~aring Eit tho City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
November 8, 1965~ ot 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing havin~ been duly give;n as required by
lew and in accordance wlth the provisions of the An:~heim (1lunicipal Code, Chepter 18,64, to hear and ;;anslder evidence
for end egeinst caicl proposed conditional use and to investlgate And make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; end
WNEREAS, seid Commission, eftec due inspection, investigation, end study made by Itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports oEfered et seid hearing, doea Eind and decermine the following facts:
1, That the proposed use is properly one fo~ which r+ Conditionel Use Permit is nuthorized by thi~ Code, to wit:
establ3sh a hofhr~;, with on~~aale beer in an a~:;sting G.1,, Gene.rai Commer~_iaiy Zone development
with waiver of' Sec.ticn 18.,4U~070(4•a) whi~~h i•eq,,ires i~ pazking spa~.,es and for wh~I;;h 6 pa~king
space, a.re proposed on subje~_~t p,:ope; ty„
2~ xhat the lo:;ation ~f the proposed ~,e in +he cen±e- of a ve~^y sma~_T neighborhood
shopping centei would be incompat.~bie due to its ob,~e::±ionabie inri~ence to sma11 children
Frequenting the arHa~
3~ That the petitianer was,, in iactti. proposing a bee: bar :~nd propcsed a food preparatlon
area of only 10•~15~ oE the t':oor spac:eti !hereby proposing a use whi~h woLici be detrimental to
the peace, health, and general weif~aze o: the neighbors patronizing the smali shopping center~
1„ That the ~se w~uld ba incompatibie tc the establi.shed res~den±iai neiyhborhood, wh3ch
includes a church in c;?ose proximity to sub,ject property~
5~ 'That the petitione= was xequesting a waive~r~ Prom th~ minlmum number of pHrking sp,~ce~
For the proposed use in a neinhborhood shopping ;;ent:er ivhich had been developPd wi±~h 40
parking spar.es9 42 spaces wc~;d be the minlr~um requirement for i•etail service buc;inessy only
the proposed u~e wouid increase the required number i,o a total of 47 parxing spar,es„
6~ That five persons appeared z•epresenting i5 person~ present in the Cauncil Chambe;,
and six letters were received in opposltion ±o sub,jer,~ petiCion~
C1-D
-1-
~
r,
~
,~
. ~.~a.
;; '
~~
~~ ~
~
i
I
`; :\. 1
~ ~
y ~.
~I
i
~
i
~I
i
i
~
;M:.-:
;~ ; .
~ -
~i
~~ a
~
;t
~r ,i
r:~
%~'
~~;:
i:`
,~~f
~:.,
r
•S~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anehelm City P1NnninR Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition foc Conditianel Use Permit on the besis of the aforementioned Eind3ngs.
rHE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sip,~ed and approved by me this ~8th daY of ^lovember~ i965,
~ ~
C}iAIRMAN ANAHEI111 CITX ANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~~~/
,# SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSIOt4
~~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ~
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann, Kr2be~, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do horeby certify thet the fore-
going reaolution wes passed ai~d edopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of thc~ City ot pnahelm, held on
November 8, 1955, et 2:00 o'clock F.M., by the fvllowing vote of the members thereof;
: AYES: COMb1ISSI0NERS: Ai;red9 Campy Gaue: y He:b.;ty Mungal::y Perry„ Ro~,'land~
~
• NOES: COMMISSTONERS: Nhne•,
ABSENT: COhihtISSIONERS: Nonea
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this 18th day of November, 190~~
i ~
i
I
:~
~~
,
'j ,
_~
,
i ~~
j
_.. ~ "!~ I
,~
E
~~: ;
,
z:~
.:~:.
RESOLUTION NO. 1844
C2-D
~,~~~'7,~~.~.~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMh~ISSION
-2-
~
r
~