PC 1965-1966-1856RESOLUTION N0, ~~~G, SE:RIES 1965-66
A RESOLUTION OF' THE CITY PLANNING COMNISSION OF THE CITY OW' /1NAHEZAI
THAT PETJTION FOR CONDITIONAL USE P~RMIT ~785 BE CRANTED
.,. :yrr'~
~
\ ~~
~~. i
, I.
i
'I
wHERE~.s, che City pt.-
Uae Pecmit trom PAC IF IC UN i
California, Owner; DAVII)
of cErtain real property
California, as desc•,•ib~d
set forth in full
~Ing Con~mleeion oI the Clty ot An~h~ia dld recelv~ ~ v~dtisd P~tltion t~ ConditlaN
+ CCNFERENCC UF SLVENTfI DAY AI~VENTISTS, p, U, Dox 146, Glendale,
E. TERMOFlL~h, A41 E~st 4th Street, I.ong lieach, California, Agent
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, ;tat;~ of
in Exhibit "A" attac.hed heretn and referred to herein as thouyh
; ~nd
WHEREAS, the Clty Plonning Commisslon did hold a public headnQ at the City Holl in the City of An~helm on
November 22, 1965, ot 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of s~id public headng havlnt b~en dul
law end in eccord~nce ~vlth the proviaions oE the Mahelm Municipal code~ Chapter 18,N, to he~r ~n~! c,~on jde~evldeece
for and egeinat said proposed oonditfonAl use ~nd to inveetiqete and make tiadieo~~ ~nd reooarme~d~tlon~ ia conn~ctlon
therewith; and
WHEREAS, aaid Commiselon, aEter due Insper!a-.w:, iaveetis~Uon, Rnd ~tudy m~de by itselt and ln its beh~l(, u~d
aEter due consider~tion oE all evidence and reporte ~• ilered ot seld hesr~nQ, does ilnd aad detenmine the followia~ l~ct~;
1. That the propoeed uee is propCrly one (or which a Condltional ,Use per~nlt ls rnthadsed by thls Code, to
~; estab lsh an office builc;ing in the Commercial Recreation Area with waiver of Section
1~.04.030~b-1) which requir~es 433 pa;kiny spar,es for sub'ect
spaces. ~ ~roper~ty to permit 380 parking
2. That the propoeed uae pill not edversely aif~ct the ~djolnln` lnnd us~as and the ~roAth ~nd dw9lopmeat ot
the nrea in v~h{ch it ie propoeed to be locoted.
3. That the eize and shape of the aite propoaed Eoc the uae is adequate ta allow thp full de~rolope~ent ot fbe
proposed uee in a monner not detdmental to the paticular erea nor to the peace, he~lth, ^~fety, ~nd ~enenl walf~re
of the Citlzene of the City of Maheim.
4. That the Qranting of the Conditional Use Permit under the condltioas impoeed, it ony, will not be dettimeet~l
to the peace, hcalth, anfety, and generel pellare oE the Citisens oE the City of An~helm,
5o That the Commission considered the pr-~posed development. in relation to Re,olution
No~ 410y Seiies 1962-63, establishing a land use policy for the Commercial Recreaticn Area,
and construed that the proposed development was generally consist.ant with that land use policy.
The Commission further no+ec, that the proposed buildiny ~n~as to devol.e a significant amount of
floor space to r~ational trade exhibitions and would abut an arterial highway which had
ready access to the freeway, and,th~refore~could be construed to qualify as a permissible
development under said policy~, Nowever, if such construction is noL possible under said
policy9 it is .recomrner.~ied that said Cummer :al Recreation Az•ea land use policy res,~~.ution
be amended to permit the p;oposed development.,
6~ That no one appeared in opposition to subject pei;ition~
C1-G _1_
~~ ~ .~
~~
;
,~
....'~`.- . ..,~:-?'1 ~ ------•--- -,---- T---- .~. . ,.~,,,~., -- ~ . :~~~.i'.f,~- _ _ ""s"" . -d
;>
~
..~,~.~.~ ~~, :; , ~ ,,
,. , , .~., ,,..
_~..._~... . ,.
~:,.~~~..~ ~ ~~ < <~»
z
~. .
NOW, TNERE~ORE, B~ IT RESOLVED thet the Anohelm City Plenning Commiasion does heteby grant aubJect
Petitlon fot Cond~donel Uae Pe~mit, upon the following condltlona whlch are hereby found to be o neceaeary pterequialte
to tho proposed use of the ~ub)ect property in order to presetve the setety end gene~al welfare of the Cltizens of the
Cl(y af AnAheim:
1,. That the owners of sub,ject property shall pay to the City of AnaF~r,im the sum of $2.00
per fi•~nt foot alonq Flarbor I3oulevard, for street lighi:ing purposes.
2~ That the o~~ne.rs of sub,ject propei•ty sha11 pay to tl~e City oF Anaheim the sum of 15¢ p~r
front Eoot along Harhnr BoulevardY for tree planting pi~rposes~
3. That trash sto.rage areas shall be providsd in accnrdance with appraved plans on file
with i:he office of the Directo.r of Pub13c Work;;,.
4. That fire hydrants shal.l be ins~;all~d as 7~?qulr~cl and determined to be nec~ssary by
the Ch~ief of the fiir.e Aepartment~
5~ That all construction shall be in conforrnance to the Uniform Building Code as adopted
by the City of Anaheim.
6o That CondiLion hos~ 1 and 2, above menL-ioned, shall be cornplied with prior to the
time that the Building Permit, is issued or. Withir~ a peripd of 180 days from date hereof,
whichever occurs firsi;, or such furtl~er i;ime as the Commission or City Council may grant.
7o That any ~ir conditioniny facililies shall be properly shiel~ed from view from abutting
streets.
R~ That Conditior; Nos~. 3,, 4, 5, and 7, above mentioned, shall be cnmplied with pr.ior to
final building inspection,.
9~ That sub,ject pi~opez~ty shall be d~aveloped substantially in accordanc~ with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 7.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 2n
/
- ~ ~~ -
CHAIRMAN AIQAf~EIM
A.TTEST;
, /
/%iy~.-;•^./ ~ ~~'LG•-~2~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMh1ISSI0N
STA'TE OF CALIFORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEih~ )
y of D~cember., 19650
PLANNING CUAiM11IS510N
I, Ann Krebs, Sec~etary of the City Planning Commission oE the City of Anaheim, do t~ereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on November 22, 1965, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the fnllowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMiSSIONERS: A1'1red, Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Munyall<•
NOES: COMMJSSIONERS: Perryy Rowland~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITI~ESS WHEREOF, I havehereunto set my hand this 2nd day of December, 1965~
,
.~
i
~
'. 1 ~
,~
;l
:;
.,.._;
~
, _
~
,i
;: ; ~'
~ ~
;.~:-; -
..;
~ ,• ;
.._~ :
- ;.~
L/v""J-~:r., •r,...~ j~~LG~~.,..-
SECRETARY ANAfiEIM CITY PLANNING COMA1ISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 1856
-2-
.;2-G
~