PC 1965-1966-1865>, t
RCSOL,UTION N~. 1865, SERIE5 .1965~66
A RESOI,UTION OF THF. CITY AGANNING COMMISSiON OF THf: C1TY OF ANAHFIM
RECOAIMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF '1'NE CITY OF ANAi1tIM TIiAT
PE7'lr'~N FOE2 RCCLASSIFICATION N~. 65-66-57 E3E DENIED
... ,~
; '
~~
~ b
,
~~ ~
.~
l
~.
.l
-''
~
,
, ~.
WHEREAS, the City Plonning Commiysion of tlie City of rlneheim dld reaeive n verified Petitton for Reclasaiflce-
tton from JACK C~ DUTTCN, 921 Pioneer Drive, Anat~eim, California, Owneri wILC,Y'S MOTOf2 SAf.ES
OF SANTA ANA, INCORPORAI'~U, hlo F. Foust, PL•esident, 1110 East Oran,yethor~e, Anaheim,California,
Agent of' cei•tain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of'
California, as described .in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred tc, herein as though set
forth in !'ull
; nnd
WfiEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold p public heAring nt the City Hall in the City oE pnaheim on
November 22~ 1965, at 2:00 o'clock P,M., notice of ~aid public hearing heving been ~uly given os required
by IAw end !n accordance with the provisians of the Anoheim hlunicipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evi-
dence for and ngainst seid proposed recl~ssificc~tion end to investig~te and mnl<e tindings nnd recommendations in
connection therewith: and
WHEREAS, sHid Commission, aEter due inspection, investigetion, wnd study made by itself c~nd in its hehalf,
and aEter due consideration of ~+ll evidence and reports offered at soid hearing, does find nnd determine the following
Eects:
1, Thet the petitioner proposes e reclassiEication of the above describe~ properry from the M-~1, Liy;it I:~dustri.al,
Zone to the C~ly General Commer::ia.i, Zone to establish an E~xisting on~~~a1e liqu~~r est:abli.shment
and related commercial uses in conj~nct:on with an existing re~,taurant as a~~onforn~iny use and
to permit the Future addition of a moLel and a iuau building and related comm~rcial shops~
2. That the proposed reclassifi~ation o(~ subject property is not necessary ar,d/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the ~ommunity.,
3. That the proposed *eciassificati.on of subjecl proper'y doe:; not proper?y :relate to
the zones and their perrnitted uses locally established in close proxi,*nit~y to subject property
and to the zones and their permitted uses qeneral'ly established th:rouc~hout the community~
4~ That the proposed reclassification wouid set ~n undesirable prec•edent which might
encourage commercial uses for the rem~ining M-1 parcels to the east ~nd west of subject property~
5. That the agent for the peti'~ioner st.ated he was not desirous c,'' iequestinq re;;lassi-~
fication oF subject propertyy but only ±--,at he be per~.,ittcd to establish an existing on~•s~1e
liquor establishmen{: ancl .related commercial uses in conjunction ~tiit.h an existing restaurant
as a conforming use, and to pQrmit ttie future addition of ~ mo;.ei and luau building and related
commercial shops;~
6. That no one appeared in opposition to subjert petition.
R 1-D .1_
~
~
~
T. ,
,
..,
:,'.
~
A
,:'~:~;r~ ~
~~ 1
`~ ~ ~ ~
I
,
; ~
~
~
~; l '
; ~
~
~.
~ ~,
~
..;
',
~
i
~
;
i
'1
' ,
~~ ~~
'-„`~1
i -
~i
_,
.~
,
~
~.
_,
,
~{,
,
.;
-.,
,.
~ *
- ~~! ..~x
~,
.E
-„.;;
~~r~:~+
,'t .
,~;_
,,~
.~-
~
~
+c~.
~:~.
\ ~~ ~
I
' ~ ~, i
~
~
~;
i
,.I
I
i
i
i
j
i
~
~
~
~
..;
;•;
I
.;
~i
1
l
_ ~~
i ~
..._a
~
,i ~
~
'~ ;
- ~ I
,;; `~ i
4
: ~` ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thnt the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anahelm that subject Petition for Reclassification be denied on the bASis of the
eforementioned findings.
THE FORF.GOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 2nd day of Uecernber, 1965~
~~ ~~ v~ r vc~tititi(,,~- ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM1I CITY PLANNI]G COMMISSION
ATTEST:
f ' -~'~7~.~'-'/_L~l~[.~~°"'--~i
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY nF ANAHEIM )
I, AnR .Krebs~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission oE the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the Eore-
going resolution was passed and ndopted at a meeting o~ the City Planning Commission oE the City of Anaheim, held on
November 22~ 1965~ at 2;00 o'clock P.At., by the following votP of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allredy Camp, Herbst, Mungall, Perry, Rowland~
NO~S: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Gauer.
IN WITNESS „HEREOF, I hc.ve hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of December, 1965a
~!1 ~l , .. . ~ ~/..~.i`.~.~..-
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1865
R2-D
-2-
4