PC 1965-1966-1922RGSOLUTION N0, 1922~ SERTES 19G5-66
A RESCLUTION OF TH~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C1TY QF ANANEIM
R~:COMMENDING TO TF1E C.ITY CQUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
1'ETITION FOR RECLASSII~ ICATION N0, -~5~~~-80 B~ APPROVEU
, •~-~~ ;.
, ;~ '
~~ ~ ;
r ~i
;\ ' ~
l
,
i ~
~
-i
i "
~
~.
~
°:,,
1
~ ~, i
WHEREIIS, the City Planning Commission of the Clty of Aneheim did recelve e verified Petltion for Reclassiflca-
tionfrom FERNE M~ KEELE, 829 South Claudtna 5tr.eet, Anaheim~ California, Owner; WAYNE GpH
10666 West;minster Avenue, Garden Grove, California A
in the C.ity of Ariaheim, County of Urance ' 9ent of certain real LE,
feet of the South 17b feet of the West~125sfeet of L.oti5~of~W~id~tcribed asrtlerNortht165ed
5ubdivision, as shown on r~ ma~ thereof recorded in book 1~;~e 9h '~'reeman, McCloughan
th~ office of the County Recorder af s~id Or,~nye Count ~ F~~ 2' f~~~OId of Surveyy in
Ya EXCEFTIN~ the North 55 feet thereof
; E~h~
W~ICREAS, the City Planning Comrr~ission did hold a public hea~~ng at the City Hell in the City uf Anaheim on
January 31, 1966, ~t 2:00 o'clock P.M. r.otice oE said public heacing having been dul
y given es requi~ed by
Inw and in accordence with the provis3oos of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,72, to hear and consider evidence
for and against said proposed reclassific3tion and to investigate end make findings ond recommendations in connection
therewith; and
.
'1.
!
.: ~~
,
1
: f -
;
1
r:.' ,~ ~
1
;
- ~
1
_.,7` '~j
~^w~"
y
;.:% :
..~e:
-~..~'
WHEREAS, said Commission, afte~ due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself and in its behalf, and
. after due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does Eind and determine the followin fa
g cts:
1~ That the petitioner pmposes a reclessification of the above described prnperty from the R-1 , One F~mi 1 y
Re~identi.:i Zone I;o the R••3y Muitipie Fdmiiy Re~idt~r,t~~jl, Zone f,o estali;ish ..~ ~„
sUbject. propeity„ plex on
7., "I'hat the pr.oposed reciassifi~~ati~n ls in conforman•e Nith the Gene:ral P,~n„
`~: 3. That the ro osed reclassification of sub'ect ro ert
per developnrent oE the community.
p P 1 P p y is necessery and/or desirable (or the orderly end pro-
a; 4. That the proposed reclassiEication of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
`. uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estab-
~'' lished throughout the community.
` 5~ That the proposed reclassification of sub'ect
` for and standard improvement of abuttin streets becauser~~erty does require dedication
and abut upon streets and highways which are said property does relate to
quantity of trafficy which wiil be ge~~erated ~arth~liy imp.roved to carry the type and
the circulation element of the Gene.ral Plan~ y Per.mitted use,., in ac;cordance with
6d That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.,
R-A .1_
C
A
r
''` ,~
''r~ i ~
i
i
_ i
i
~
` i
i
I
~i
~
:.I
y I
1
i
i
i
1
j
~
; I
1
'~~
:,';: ,
..,,.'.~
•i
~
~
I
:,
~
' ~i
'.' '~ \
~.: ~
. . .. j
:~
4:. ..~
r
~
~fi••`{
~I~;;t
.i:~.-
* ~,
~• ~'
I
~
i
N~W, TFIEREFORE, BE I1 ,tESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commlasion does hereby racommend
to the City Councll of the City of Anehelm thet aubJect Petitlon for Recloeelficatlon be approved and, by eo doing,
that Tltle 18-7oning of the Anehelm Municlppl Code be amended to exclude the ebuve deacribed propecty from the
R-1, One-1~amily Residential, Zone, and to incorporate said described
Pxoperty into the
R~-3, Multlple-Family Residenti~~l, Zone, upon the foll~wing cond9.tions which are hereb
found to be ~~ necessary prereq~aisite t,o Che pr.oposQd use nF s~ib oct
preserve the safet and Y
Y 9eneral welfare of t.he cit:izens of the City of~Ar~iahei.m= order to
1. 'Chat the owner of sub,jer.t p!•operty shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strlp of
land '32 feet,in wi,dthy f'rom the center line of the street, along Olive Street, for street
•,videning purposes~
2~ Tli~t the owner of sub,~ect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of
15Q pex• frant fo~t along Olive 5t.reti;, For tree p:lanting purposes,
3„ That the owne.r of suk~,ject property shall pay i;o l:he CiLy oP Anaheim the sum ot~
$?_5,.00 pec~ dwelling unlt, for new units onl
"aid amount to be paid at; the tlme the buildingUpermiteisfiS,pe~k and rec;reation purpose~,
~1.• 7'hat Lhe owner of subject proper.ty shall p~jy to the CiLy ~f Anaheim th~ sum of
$2~U0 per fr.ont foot alany 01ive Street, for street li htin
5~ That Condition Nos~ 1,, 2 and 4, above mentioncd cg Purposes~
~3 period of 1R0 days from date hereof'Y or such f~ar~ther timehas~the C;ity~Cou~ncilhmaithin
y grant.
TFIE FOREGOING RESOLUTION !s signed end approved by me thia
ATTEST:
v-r-'J •~G.:/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CIrY PLANNING COMMtSSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) S8,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM
COMMISSION
I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City P(enning Commission of the Clty of Anaheim, do heeeby certify that the fore-
going resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commiasion of the Clty of Anaheim, held on
January '1, 1966~ ~t 2;00 ~'clock P,M,, by the :ollowing vote of the members thereoE;
AYES: COMHISSIONERS: Al lred, Ca; ,p, ~auery Herbst, Mungall,, Rowland.
NOES: COMMIS3IONERS: None.
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: perry,
IN WITNE&S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thie lOth d'ay of February, 1966e
r
`~t/!'>~ J-/~ ~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 1922
R2-A ,'
. ~Z~
~T1 s w--^ ----- --
C
~e
of February, 1966.
~