PC 1965-1966-19444
RESOLUTION N0, ~9~a, SL'RTE.S ~965-~66
.
_ A RESOLUTI~N QF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C1TY OF ANAFtFIM
KECQMME,! '~;;QG TO THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF ANANEIM 'TNAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. -~5"~4"$~ BE APPROVF,Q
WHEREAS, the Clty Plenning Commlaelon of the City of Anaheim did recefve a vedfied Prtition tor Reclessifica-
tlonfrom l3ETTY M„ BRAWNER ANp JACK No BUr~GESSy c%o John Mo Vlncent, A01 West 8th Street,
Santa Ana, California, Uwners; CUGENE IiANCOCK, JR~, 9778 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, Californi.~,
~,• ' ` Agent of ceitain real
~ property situated 1.n the City of Anaheim, County of Ora,ige, State of
',,' ~ Californ~a, described as the North 178 feet ~f the West 330 feet of the•~Northwest quarter of
Section .13, Township q South, Range 10 West, ~In the Rancho San .Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as
~`.\ 1~ per map recorded in book 51 page 10 of Miscellan ~
~ recorder of said count.y; said land is shown on aemap Mil~ed .i.n bonk~811pageflShofCRecord
; of Surveys in the officu of said couni:y recorder
i
- ~
i
~
i '
~
G•
~,_
..~
~
, i
i
~
I
i
~ ; and
r`^ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisslon did hold e ~~~h~~,; hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
^. ~ ; e~~'~~ry 16, i966, et 2;00 o'clock P.M. notlce ;,i seid public hearing heving been duly given aP requtred by
~ ' lsw end in accordence with the provlsions of the Anahe:~n Municipal Code, ChApter 18.72, to hear and ~onsider evidence
'-. ~ - for and ageinst saId proposed reclassification snd to inves~+ ete and make findin and recommendations in c
~ therewith; end ~ g ~'` onnection
_; •j
WHEREAS, said Commisslon, eEter d~r inspection, investi~;ation, and study madc by Itself end In its behalf, and
after due cansideration of all evidence end reports offered et seid hearing, does find and determtne the following facts;
. 1. That the petitioner proposea a reclassiflcatlon ~f the ab~ve described property from the R-A., Agr i^u: ti:: ~ 1,
Zone to ;he 4-'~y General Commercial, Zone to es*~~;ish a;ervi;•e st?t-on ~nd ;;ommercial shops
on s~~b~ject property.,
2„ That the proposed :rec::a,sif'ica±lon i, considered in ronjune;ticn with Generhi P'i~~
Amerdment No, 72.
~
` .i
i
~
;:r,'
1~
":~:_~
*
I~
;
r
~
~^I
,~,
:;.::i:
3. That the proposed reclesslfication of subject property is necesser• =r.~!/or desireble for the orderly and pro-
per developnrent of the community.
4. That the proposed recla5sificetion of subJect property does properly rel~ite to the zones and t}~eic permitted
uaea locelly esteblished in close ~,roximity to subject property and to the zones end their permitted uses gentrelly estab-
lished throughout the commur.ity.
5~ That the proposed reclassirication of subject prope°ty do~~_, requi:re dedi.cation for and
standac•d improvement oF' ahutting streets because said property does rE;ate to and abut upon
streets ar.d highways t,~!~:~h have been designed to carry the iype and c,uantity of trafficy whir,h
tivili be generated by the permitted usesy in a:oi•dance wic.r, the circ.,la±ion e;ement of the
General Plan.,
6~ That one letter was receivedy and one person appea~ed in oppos:tion9 and one person
appeared in favor of subject petition~
R-A
-1-
~
~
NOW, TF(ER~rOt2~, BE IT irESOLVED that the Anehnim C;ity Pl~nning ~:ommis~lon does hereby roao~nmr.nd
~~~ tl~e Clty Council of tho Clty of Anehelm that subJect l~etitlon tor Reclaaeiflcation be approved end, by so doinR,
rti~~~t Title 18•'Lon~ng of the Anohefm Munlcipel Code be amended to excluda the above descrlbod property from the
`'. A~ Aqricultur~.al, Zone, and to incorpoz~~te Said ciescribc~d property lnto the C~l, Grner:,
C'a;r~,mezcial, ~:one, upon Lhe iollowing canditions whlch are har~by fourld to be a neces~~•~ry
~-r~ret~uisitn to the proposed use of subjec:t property ln order to pre9erve the safE~ty and
~ yen«~rril welfare of the cit.izens of the City ot Anaheims
., Th.3; t,h~ c~~~ner~ af :unject, p~~operty sh,31_ ,lc~~~cf ta '~nt: Clt:y o~ An~iheim r~ :T:ri~ r,~' .:~rnJ
.~.~ ;~'~~~ in ,n»tr~, t'rom the centet :ine c~!' the st~.~.~,,,, a'.nn~~ So,,±h 5tcee,, for s!rec>t ~~r1:E~ninJ
1)L[~;0!:~@:i,~
~~~ ~~l~ii: LI1B Ui~RI~I'S of :.,ubject ~~SU~Bft,y ;h~L.i df.~E'~.~j ;0 tflC i
~ ty of An~~heim ;~ sc.rip ,.~f ;:~n~i
`~.s iec;t tn ~ci:1~h, f:u~n t.he ~enter 1'anF~ cf the ,tree~., alon~; :~t ~ie Cu.,ege Bo~.~levar~i, in~ ;u:iing
~; `<'~ loo~ r~idiu~: ~:OT'Il@f I'CCUT•n., fo.r ytrer,t ~~iar~n:n~~ c;, ~pc:;e.~,
.1 , ~~h f! :; ~TBNt 1f11~fUVC'filCflt p.ilfl5 S~'liil.. h@ pre~ ~i: P.f~ 9(1C~ ,1 , : (?fl IfIC'~': Lfl~ > > + ~
rha Ci~y o~ An;~heim along So.i~h S*xe~t ;~nd S+_ate Co...e• :: IIoui~~~~~3rd,9~,u~:h :~, ~^~q,~,l:~mf.n.., of
....;'+~ - ~ a ~r1.,s ,:~nd a~,cters,
~;.ic.eh~~,:~ks,, :,~:ec~~ g.~~3ding and p~~ving, dr;3inage faci~l~.~es, c, ott~er ;i~;p,~:'.~: ~~~^ wo;k sh~i'1
_:~ .~e om~;;ec,.d a, :oaui: ed by the Ci*_y Engirieer., anrl 'in ~c.c,o~~c1;.~ricG ti~t~!-, ~:•indir~9 +
_ ~pe i'~ic at .~3ns on :.._~~ in the u( f i~e of the Cli:y ~nr in~~e~r ; and ±r~at ~~ bond in ar~i lamount~;~nd
~,i :o~m 5~.~tl:;t~~~Cnry cp ~he C'ity of Ananeim Slldl:: be posted with he Ctt ta ~
` y guarantce th~,
;.nstri, ;,,;;i„n ol sa:d enginc~erin9 r~~qU;rements~
~ a. Trat tne oti~ners of ~ubjec,t p;operty st~~i; psy to the City nf Anaheim the sum o!' $2~00
;%et' r:ron~. t'oo,. aiony Sr,~~th St:eet ~and State Coiiege Hou:ev,ird,, for stceet lightinq purpose;~
; 5~ Tha*_ the ~wners OI~ SU~JPCt prnperty sha~ , pay to the Clr.y cf Anaheirn the sum of 15Q
; - prr fron*. rc,~t atona South Str~et and State College Boulevard, tor tr•ee p1~~ntiny p~~rposes..
~, b~ Tn;3~ CondiCion Nos„ ;., 2,, 3,, 4 and 5y ~bove mentiored., sha'li be compiied with w,~..in
. i ~3 period o~ ';HO d,~y; fr~m the date hereof., o: such furthe: ;ime ~as the City Cr~~_inc,~1 may c~ran!..
`1
.;
,~
.;
~
i
~
~
~
,~
~";'"""~ TH.~ FQREGOING RESOLUTION is ~igned and approved by me this 24th day of February, i9G6,
i, ~
I
~I . /~ ,
.,
l~
i CHAIRMAN ANANETM CITY PC,AN ING COMMISSION
PRO TEM
' ATTEST:
i '
I
` i ~
j _11' ~:•'6 ; ~.-'~.~ %~Z~r ~J
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1'CY PLANNYNG COMMISSION
~
i STATE OF CALIFORNJA )
~ ' COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ~S,
~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~: ~
~; I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anohelm, do hereby certify thet the Eore-
~ goin~ resolution was pa~scd and edopted at e meeting of the City P!anning Commiasion of the City of Anaheim, held on
,•~ j; February 16, 1966, et 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
- i.. ~
~~ AY~S: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, HerbstY Mungal ~Y Pe; r y., Rvw;and~
~ ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~~uer~
~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allrede
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto set my hand this 24th day of February, 1966n
.~ i
_ ~
~ ~
..~ ~~ ~ , /'
1 . , C./G/s'~/~'? f C/. /-~~
;
.~ R~, SECRE'I'ARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
;; '~ „~ ~ RESOLUTION N0. 1944
~ R2-A ~
, -2-
1
;4~.r-^ ~
_.:~
~
~
~
4
RESOLUTION N0, ~9~a, SL'RTE.S ~965-~66
.
_ A RESOLUTI~N QF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C1TY OF ANAFtFIM
KECQMME,! '~;;QG TO THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF ANANEIM 'TNAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. -~5"~4"$~ BE APPROVF,Q
WHEREAS, the Clty Plenning Commlaelon of the City of Anaheim did recefve a vedfied Prtition tor Reclessifica-
tlonfrom l3ETTY M„ BRAWNER ANp JACK No BUr~GESSy c%o John Mo Vlncent, A01 West 8th Street,
Santa Ana, California, Uwners; CUGENE IiANCOCK, JR~, 9778 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, Californi.~,
~,• ' ` Agent of ceitain real
~ property situated 1.n the City of Anaheim, County of Ora,ige, State of
',,' ~ Californ~a, described as the North 178 feet ~f the West 330 feet of the•~Northwest quarter of
Section .13, Township q South, Range 10 West, ~In the Rancho San .Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as
~`.\ 1~ per map recorded in book 51 page 10 of Miscellan ~
~ recorder of said count.y; said land is shown on aemap Mil~ed .i.n bonk~811pageflShofCRecord
; of Surveys in the officu of said couni:y recorder
i
- ~
i
~
i '
~
G•
~,_
..~
~
, i
i
~
I
i
~ ; and
r`^ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisslon did hold e ~~~h~~,; hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
^. ~ ; e~~'~~ry 16, i966, et 2;00 o'clock P.M. notlce ;,i seid public hearing heving been duly given aP requtred by
~ ' lsw end in accordence with the provlsions of the Anahe:~n Municipal Code, ChApter 18.72, to hear and ~onsider evidence
'-. ~ - for and ageinst saId proposed reclassification snd to inves~+ ete and make findin and recommendations in c
~ therewith; end ~ g ~'` onnection
_; •j
WHEREAS, said Commisslon, eEter d~r inspection, investi~;ation, and study madc by Itself end In its behalf, and
after due cansideration of all evidence end reports offered et seid hearing, does find and determtne the following facts;
. 1. That the petitioner proposea a reclassiflcatlon ~f the ab~ve described property from the R-A., Agr i^u: ti:: ~ 1,
Zone to ;he 4-'~y General Commercial, Zone to es*~~;ish a;ervi;•e st?t-on ~nd ;;ommercial shops
on s~~b~ject property.,
2„ That the proposed :rec::a,sif'ica±lon i, considered in ronjune;ticn with Generhi P'i~~
Amerdment No, 72.
~
` .i
i
~
;:r,'
1~
":~:_~
*
I~
;
r
~
~^I
,~,
:;.::i:
3. That the proposed reclesslfication of subject property is necesser• =r.~!/or desireble for the orderly and pro-
per developnrent of the community.
4. That the proposed recla5sificetion of subJect property does properly rel~ite to the zones and t}~eic permitted
uaea locelly esteblished in close ~,roximity to subject property and to the zones end their permitted uses gentrelly estab-
lished throughout the commur.ity.
5~ That the proposed reclassirication of subject prope°ty do~~_, requi:re dedi.cation for and
standac•d improvement oF' ahutting streets because said property does rE;ate to and abut upon
streets ar.d highways t,~!~:~h have been designed to carry the iype and c,uantity of trafficy whir,h
tivili be generated by the permitted usesy in a:oi•dance wic.r, the circ.,la±ion e;ement of the
General Plan.,
6~ That one letter was receivedy and one person appea~ed in oppos:tion9 and one person
appeared in favor of subject petition~
R-A
-1-
~
~
NOW, TF(ER~rOt2~, BE IT irESOLVED that the Anehnim C;ity Pl~nning ~:ommis~lon does hereby roao~nmr.nd
~~~ tl~e Clty Council of tho Clty of Anehelm that subJect l~etitlon tor Reclaaeiflcation be approved end, by so doinR,
rti~~~t Title 18•'Lon~ng of the Anohefm Munlcipel Code be amended to excluda the above descrlbod property from the
`'. A~ Aqricultur~.al, Zone, and to incorpoz~~te Said ciescribc~d property lnto the C~l, Grner:,
C'a;r~,mezcial, ~:one, upon Lhe iollowing canditions whlch are har~by fourld to be a neces~~•~ry
~-r~ret~uisitn to the proposed use of subjec:t property ln order to pre9erve the safE~ty and
~ yen«~rril welfare of the cit.izens of the City ot Anaheims
., Th.3; t,h~ c~~~ner~ af :unject, p~~operty sh,31_ ,lc~~~cf ta '~nt: Clt:y o~ An~iheim r~ :T:ri~ r,~' .:~rnJ
.~.~ ;~'~~~ in ,n»tr~, t'rom the centet :ine c~!' the st~.~.~,,,, a'.nn~~ So,,±h 5tcee,, for s!rec>t ~~r1:E~ninJ
1)L[~;0!:~@:i,~
~~~ ~~l~ii: LI1B Ui~RI~I'S of :.,ubject ~~SU~Bft,y ;h~L.i df.~E'~.~j ;0 tflC i
~ ty of An~~heim ;~ sc.rip ,.~f ;:~n~i
`~.s iec;t tn ~ci:1~h, f:u~n t.he ~enter 1'anF~ cf the ,tree~., alon~; :~t ~ie Cu.,ege Bo~.~levar~i, in~ ;u:iing
~; `<'~ loo~ r~idiu~: ~:OT'Il@f I'CCUT•n., fo.r ytrer,t ~~iar~n:n~~ c;, ~pc:;e.~,
.1 , ~~h f! :; ~TBNt 1f11~fUVC'filCflt p.ilfl5 S~'liil.. h@ pre~ ~i: P.f~ 9(1C~ ,1 , : (?fl IfIC'~': Lfl~ > > + ~
rha Ci~y o~ An;~heim along So.i~h S*xe~t ;~nd S+_ate Co...e• :: IIoui~~~~~3rd,9~,u~:h :~, ~^~q,~,l:~mf.n.., of
....;'+~ - ~ a ~r1.,s ,:~nd a~,cters,
~;.ic.eh~~,:~ks,, :,~:ec~~ g.~~3ding and p~~ving, dr;3inage faci~l~.~es, c, ott~er ;i~;p,~:'.~: ~~~^ wo;k sh~i'1
_:~ .~e om~;;ec,.d a, :oaui: ed by the Ci*_y Engirieer., anrl 'in ~c.c,o~~c1;.~ricG ti~t~!-, ~:•indir~9 +
_ ~pe i'~ic at .~3ns on :.._~~ in the u( f i~e of the Cli:y ~nr in~~e~r ; and ±r~at ~~ bond in ar~i lamount~;~nd
~,i :o~m 5~.~tl:;t~~~Cnry cp ~he C'ity of Ananeim Slldl:: be posted with he Ctt ta ~
` y guarantce th~,
;.nstri, ;,,;;i„n ol sa:d enginc~erin9 r~~qU;rements~
~ a. Trat tne oti~ners of ~ubjec,t p;operty st~~i; psy to the City nf Anaheim the sum o!' $2~00
;%et' r:ron~. t'oo,. aiony Sr,~~th St:eet ~and State Coiiege Hou:ev,ird,, for stceet lightinq purpose;~
; 5~ Tha*_ the ~wners OI~ SU~JPCt prnperty sha~ , pay to the Clr.y cf Anaheirn the sum of 15Q
; - prr fron*. rc,~t atona South Str~et and State College Boulevard, tor tr•ee p1~~ntiny p~~rposes..
~, b~ Tn;3~ CondiCion Nos„ ;., 2,, 3,, 4 and 5y ~bove mentiored., sha'li be compiied with w,~..in
. i ~3 period o~ ';HO d,~y; fr~m the date hereof., o: such furthe: ;ime ~as the City Cr~~_inc,~1 may c~ran!..
`1
.;
,~
.;
~
i
~
~
~
,~
~";'"""~ TH.~ FQREGOING RESOLUTION is ~igned and approved by me this 24th day of February, i9G6,
i, ~
I
~I . /~ ,
.,
l~
i CHAIRMAN ANANETM CITY PC,AN ING COMMISSION
PRO TEM
' ATTEST:
i '
I
` i ~
j _11' ~:•'6 ; ~.-'~.~ %~Z~r ~J
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1'CY PLANNYNG COMMISSION
~
i STATE OF CALIFORNJA )
~ ' COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ~S,
~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~: ~
~; I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anohelm, do hereby certify thet the Eore-
~ goin~ resolution was pa~scd and edopted at e meeting of the City P!anning Commiasion of the City of Anaheim, held on
,•~ j; February 16, 1966, et 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
- i.. ~
~~ AY~S: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, HerbstY Mungal ~Y Pe; r y., Rvw;and~
~ ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~~uer~
~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allrede
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto set my hand this 24th day of February, 1966n
.~ i
_ ~
~ ~
..~ ~~ ~ , /'
1 . , C./G/s'~/~'? f C/. /-~~
;
.~ R~, SECRE'I'ARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
;; '~ „~ ~ RESOLUTION N0. 1944
~ R2-A ~
, -2-
1
;4~.r-^ ~
_.:~
~
~
~