Loading...
PC 1965-1966-1959RESOLUTION N0. 1959, SERI['S 1965-~~6 A RESOLUTION OF 'fHE CITY PLANNING CbMMISSION OF THE CTTY OF ANAHEI41 RECOidMENDING TO 1'N~ CITY COUNCIL OF TNE CITY OF ANAIiEIM THAT PETITIQN ~'OR RECLASSIFICATION N0~ _... r~s?=$~.~2:.4Q EiE APPROVEA . ~I ~ z \ 1~ ~ ; i , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ,,-_'4~ _ I ~ `~ ..P.-~ <~ ~ ~.a I , I - i ~ .; ~ WHLREAS, the Clty Plenning Commiselon of the Clty of Anaheim did recalve a vn•ified Petltian for Reclansftice- tion from THE PACIFIC TEI.EPFDNE AND Tk:LEGRA}~H COMPANY, 1475 Sixth Avenue, Rc~om 401~ ;an Diego, California, Uwner of certain real property situa:ed in the City of An~heim, County of Orange, State of Califoz•nia, describe~ as [.ot Nos. A, 5, G, 7 and 8 of Vlneyard f..ot p-5 ; end ' WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiesion did hold a public hearing et the City Nell in the City of Aneheim on Februdry 28~ 1966~ at 2;p0 o'clock P.M, notice oE seid public hearing having been duly glven as req~ired by law end in accordence with the provistons of the Anahelm M11unicipel Code, Chapter 18,72, to heac and consider evidence for and egalnst said ptopoaed reclessificet~on and to investigatE and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; end WHEREAS, said Commiasion, after due inspection, investigatlon, end study mede by itself end in its behalf, and after due consideration oE all evtdence end reports ofEered et seid heering, does Eind and determine the Eollowing facts: 1. Thet the petitloner proposes a reclessificetion of the above described property ftom the R-3, A4ultiple Family Residential, Zorie to the C-2, General Commercial, Zone to establish subj~ct p.roperty in a more appropriate zone t~ permit necessary expansiun of the Pacific I'elephone Company facilities~ 2. That ;he proposed reclassafication is in conformance with th~ General Aland 3. Thet the propoaed reclesslfication of subject property is necesaery and/or desirable for the orderly end pro- per developnrent of the community. 4. Thet the propoaed reclessificetion of sub)ect property does properly relate to the zAnes and their permitted uaes locelly eateblished in close proximity to subjec2 property and to tt,e zones and their permitted usea generally estab- ;ished throughout the comi:,unity. 5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject pet.tion. __~~ 1 ~ ~- _ i - , a ', I - I ~~ ~ : ; :i ~~ , ~: ' ~ ~ .yy~_Y~ .,h.. R-A •.~'"k• ~a,. -1- y ~ ~t : ~...~ ~.~ i~ , '\ k1 ! l ~ j l I ~ ~ ~ I ( I _ 4.. ~ 1 ~I I I i i i ~ i ::.:...1 't J _i i i , .~ ~ ,' .j `~; . i ,~ ;~ : ~ °~ ~ 1 -x Jmi~ . . NOW, THER~~ORE, BE 1T RESQLVEb thet the Anaheim Clty PlsnninQ Commisal~n doeA heceby recommend to the City Council of the Clty of Anehelm that aubJect Petltlon to~ Reclna~ification be epproved end, hy eo doing, that Title 18•Zoning of the Anuheim MunlclNal Code be amended to exclude the abova deacrlbed pcoperty trom the R-3, Multiple-Family Residential, 7.one, and to lncorporate said descrihed propert;y ini,u Lhe C-~, General Commercial, Zonc~, u~:on the fol lowing condltic ~s whlch are hE~reby found to t ~;, necessary prerequisite to i:he propasod use o! sub,Ject; properl:y in order to prc:servn 1.he safety and gener.al welfare of ~he cii;izens of the C9ty of Anaheims 1. That subject prc>perty shall be deve.l~ped s~ib,tanl ially in accord~nce with i~Jc~ns ;anc~ speclfications on File with the City ~F Anaheim, marlced Exhi.bit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. THE FOREGOING I2ESOLUTIQN is signed end approved by me thia i0th day of March, 196~. ~ ~ ~. ~ G'~~~- ~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Pro Tem ATTEST: ~ /,- J {~/ ~~/ J / ~f/~'f?J ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITX PLANNING COMM~ ~ION ~ ~ ~ .. ~ I~ , - ,~ - ~ ` ': ~ ~. ~ , ~ ' ,. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY CF' ORA1+iGE ) cs~ CITY OF ANAHEIM j I, Ann Krebs, $ecretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anehc3m, do her~by certify that the fo~~_ going resolution was passed and adopted at e meeting of the City Plann:ng Commiasion oE the City of Anaheim, helc~ o~ February 28, 19F6, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membere thereof; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ~~P• Gauer, Herbst, Rowland. NUES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Mungall, Perry. IN WITNESS WHEREOr, I hwvc hereunto set my hand this 101:h day o: March, 1966. ~.!~ .-~ . , ~a:., ," , <. : SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOPI RESOLUTION NO. 1959 ~ R2-A .2. ~ ,~ ~, M,.~,. ---.,~;-, ~,~ ~ ._.._ __._,._.T_..--r-~a..:..,.,..- . _ . _ . ~~ . . I . , `!w~rx^ow. ,+~~mr,n.~sy ' ' r . ~ ~~f.Y ~. ~ ::~ :~~~• .. _ _ x. RESOLUTION N0. 1959, SERI['S 1965-~~6 A RESOLUTION OF 'fHE CITY PLANNING CbMMISSION OF THE CTTY OF ANAHEI41 RECOidMENDING TO 1'N~ CITY COUNCIL OF TNE CITY OF ANAIiEIM THAT PETITIQN ~'OR RECLASSIFICATION N0~ _... r~s?=$~.~2:.4Q EiE APPROVEA . ~I ~ z \ 1~ ~ ; i , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ,,-_'4~ _ I ~ `~ ..P.-~ <~ ~ ~.a I , I - i ~ .; ~ WHLREAS, the Clty Plenning Commiselon of the Clty of Anaheim did recalve a vn•ified Petltian for Reclansftice- tion from THE PACIFIC TEI.EPFDNE AND Tk:LEGRA}~H COMPANY, 1475 Sixth Avenue, Rc~om 401~ ;an Diego, California, Uwner of certain real property situa:ed in the City of An~heim, County of Orange, State of Califoz•nia, describe~ as [.ot Nos. A, 5, G, 7 and 8 of Vlneyard f..ot p-5 ; end ' WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiesion did hold a public hearing et the City Nell in the City of Aneheim on Februdry 28~ 1966~ at 2;p0 o'clock P.M, notice oE seid public hearing having been duly glven as req~ired by law end in accordence with the provistons of the Anahelm M11unicipel Code, Chapter 18,72, to heac and consider evidence for and egalnst said ptopoaed reclessificet~on and to investigatE and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; end WHEREAS, said Commiasion, after due inspection, investigatlon, end study mede by itself end in its behalf, and after due consideration oE all evtdence end reports ofEered et seid heering, does Eind and determine the Eollowing facts: 1. Thet the petitloner proposes a reclessificetion of the above described property ftom the R-3, A4ultiple Family Residential, Zorie to the C-2, General Commercial, Zone to establish subj~ct p.roperty in a more appropriate zone t~ permit necessary expansiun of the Pacific I'elephone Company facilities~ 2. That ;he proposed reclassafication is in conformance with th~ General Aland 3. Thet the propoaed reclesslfication of subject property is necesaery and/or desirable for the orderly end pro- per developnrent of the community. 4. Thet the propoaed reclessificetion of sub)ect property does properly relate to the zAnes and their permitted uaes locelly eateblished in close proximity to subjec2 property and to tt,e zones and their permitted usea generally estab- ;ished throughout the comi:,unity. 5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject pet.tion. __~~ 1 ~ ~- _ i - , a ', I - I ~~ ~ : ; :i ~~ , ~: ' ~ ~ .yy~_Y~ .,h.. R-A •.~'"k• ~a,. -1- y ~ ~t : ~...~ ~.~ i~ , '\ k1 ! l ~ j l I ~ ~ ~ I ( I _ 4.. ~ 1 ~I I I i i i ~ i ::.:...1 't J _i i i , .~ ~ ,' .j `~; . i ,~ ;~ : ~ °~ ~ 1 -x Jmi~ . . NOW, THER~~ORE, BE 1T RESQLVEb thet the Anaheim Clty PlsnninQ Commisal~n doeA heceby recommend to the City Council of the Clty of Anehelm that aubJect Petltlon to~ Reclna~ification be epproved end, hy eo doing, that Title 18•Zoning of the Anuheim MunlclNal Code be amended to exclude the abova deacrlbed pcoperty trom the R-3, Multiple-Family Residential, 7.one, and to lncorporate said descrihed propert;y ini,u Lhe C-~, General Commercial, Zonc~, u~:on the fol lowing condltic ~s whlch are hE~reby found to t ~;, necessary prerequisite to i:he propasod use o! sub,Ject; properl:y in order to prc:servn 1.he safety and gener.al welfare of ~he cii;izens of the C9ty of Anaheims 1. That subject prc>perty shall be deve.l~ped s~ib,tanl ially in accord~nce with i~Jc~ns ;anc~ speclfications on File with the City ~F Anaheim, marlced Exhi.bit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. THE FOREGOING I2ESOLUTIQN is signed end approved by me thia i0th day of March, 196~. ~ ~ ~. ~ G'~~~- ~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Pro Tem ATTEST: ~ /,- J {~/ ~~/ J / ~f/~'f?J ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITX PLANNING COMM~ ~ION ~ ~ ~ .. ~ I~ , - ,~ - ~ ` ': ~ ~. ~ , ~ ' ,. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY CF' ORA1+iGE ) cs~ CITY OF ANAHEIM j I, Ann Krebs, $ecretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anehc3m, do her~by certify that the fo~~_ going resolution was passed and adopted at e meeting of the City Plann:ng Commiasion oE the City of Anaheim, helc~ o~ February 28, 19F6, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membere thereof; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ~~P• Gauer, Herbst, Rowland. NUES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Mungall, Perry. IN WITNESS WHEREOr, I hwvc hereunto set my hand this 101:h day o: March, 1966. ~.!~ .-~ . , ~a:., ," , <. : SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOPI RESOLUTION NO. 1959 ~ R2-A .2. ~ ,~ ~, M,.~,. ---.,~;-, ~,~ ~ ._.._ __._,._.T_..--r-~a..:..,.,..- . _ . _ . ~~ . . I . , `!w~rx^ow. ,+~~mr,n.~sy ' ' r . ~ ~~f.Y ~. ~ ::~ :~~~• .. _ _ x.