Loading...
PC 1965-1966-1961RESOLUTxON N0. 1961, SERIES 1965-66 A RESOLUTION OF TN~ CITY ALANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF ANAHGIM RECOMMENDING Tp TNE CITY COl')NCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEiM TNAT PETITION FOR RECL,ASSIF'ICATION N0. 65-66_-89 y~ ppp~OVF;D ._ a i \ 1 ~' i I I. ~ I ~I ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ,I ~ ~ _; ~_:; - ~ ; , ; * ~ ~~ , ~ ~ 1 -~n-•r .1; . ~ »; WHERGAS, the City Planning Corn~riselon of the Clty of Anahclm dld recclve e verifled Petition tor Recl~+saiflce- tlo~froa il+VERNA CIl' ;K, 891 S~uCh Walnut, Apartment 315, Anaheim, California, ~)wner; A. J. SCHUTTE, 4G9•A West Valencla Drive, Fullerton, Califarnia, Agent of certain re~~l property ~'FUated in the City of Ar~aheim, County af O.r.ange, State of Callfornia, describE~d as the we:. 115.G~ reet of that portion of lot 16 in the P, Ao Stanton ~~ract, a;; per map recorded In b:ok 5 pages 23 and 24 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the count.y recorder of s~id county, lyiny southerly of the sou±h line of the north 1.00 ar,le af ~,.id lot; EXCFPT the north 3.00 feet thereof ; end WfIEREAS, the C+ty Plenning Comrr~ission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the Clty of AnahPim on February 28~ 1966, at 2;00 o'clock P.hl, notice of seid public hearing hevi.ng been duly given as required by lew and in eccordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chaptee 18.72, to hear and consider evidence for end agoinst s~id proposed ceclassificetion end to investigate and make findings end recommendations in connection therewltn; and WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself end in its behalE, end efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered e4 said hearing, does find and determine the Following lects: 1. Thet the petittoner propases e raclessification of the above described property from the R-A~ Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Mul~tiple Family Resideni.ial, Zone tp est~.blish a two st~~y ]2 unit apart;ment development. 2. That tha pruposed reclassification is in canformance ~vith the General Plan. 3. That the proposed reclassiEication of aubject property is necessery a7d/or desireble for the orderly end pro- per developurent oE the community. 4. That the proposed ceclessificetiun oE subject property does prope;ly relate to the zunes end their permitted uQes locally established in clos~ proximity to subject property and to tlie zones and their permitted uses generally esteb- lished throughout the community. 5. That no one appear.ed in opposition to subject petition. R-A -1- ~ ~. ~.. -- - .`J''.J~, ~-` +1 ~^~....~.- ~.- +. -..~•_~er,~;::~.e~ '" . . ~~..... . ~ . . . ~~'~AI~ - . -`•~'..' , Xle;~, c ?.pM1e ~ ._..:,~'.,~ i~ \ ; i : ~ p ~ ~ i. ~ V I ~ I I i I ~ ~ ~. i ,. ; <' ~ ! , . NOW, THEREFOf2F:, B~ 1'I' FtESOLV~D th~t the Anaheim Clty Planning Commiaeion doex hereby rocommend io tha Clty Councll of the City of Anahoim thet eubJect Petitlon tor Recleseiticetlon be approved and, by so doing, that Tltle 18-Z~ning of the Aneheim Municlpal Code be amended ta exclude the alx>ve deacrlbed ptoperty ftom lhe ~-A, Ayricultural, Z~ne, and to lncorporat.e sald descrtk~ecl K~ro~erty Lito the ft-3, Mi~lt iE~l e~- Family R~sidential, 'Lone, upon the tollowiny condition, which are hareby found t,o hc <~ necessar•y prerequislte to thQ proposed use af ;;uhject propPrty in orde.r Lo pteserve ll~e safely and genez~al welfaro of the citJ.zens uf the CiCy ot Ar-iaheims 1. That the owner. of sut~jeci; propea~ty sh~711 cieed to the Cit:y of Ana;i~im ~~ st.ri.~~ a1~ lrjri~ 40 fe~t in width, from the cc~ntc~r line of tho ~t:r~et,, alon~ Winston Ro~ad, f'or sCreei. wi~ieniriq purposec. 2. Thai street i.mprovem~~nt plans ~ha].1 be urepared and ali enylnc~~riny ;i~quircinenl:' of' the City of Anaheim along Winnton Road, such a, curb~ and gutters, sld~w~~lks, s,l.rcet gr~~dinq and paving, di~ainage far,llit:ips, oi~ nther appurtenant work rhall he comE;l~~trd ,;~; required Uy tl~c~ City Engineer and in acc~rdance with si:Qnda.rd plans and ,p~cif icatione on f ile Iii tl~c~ off ice of i;he Cil;y Fngineer; and lhai; ~y bond in ,~n ~~mounf: and form sati ,factory to 1;he City c;f Anaheirn sha11 be pos~ed with ~hc City tu guarantee the ~tnst,allation of sald engineering rt~q~.iirement~,. 3. That the owner oi' sub,ject: prop~rty sha11 pay t.o ~Lhe City nf Anaheim the sur~ o!' $2.00 per front foot a].ong Wirst~n R~ad, for ,treet, li.ght:inc~ purE~oses. ~l. That the owner ot' sub,ject. prc~perty shall pay to the City of Anaheim ti~e sum of 15a per Pront foot alang Wlnston Roady for. tree p.lanting ~ur~oses. 5. That one driveway 21 feet ln wicith with a 27 Foot, radius turn-arounrl t,e providc~~~ 6. That Conc~ition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and ~-1, above m~~ntioneci, shall be cornplied witF: ~•;i:htn a period of' 180 days Prom dal,e hezeo(', ~i such further time as the City Counr.il !nay grart. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed ond epproved by me this lOth day of March, 19660 .~ ~~: CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNMG C MISSION ATTE~T: pro Tt•m ~ 1 ~~ ~ / I .~/1 ~/l 1-/ i' X7 i,/i~ .~/ ~ ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ ~ STATE OF CALIFORN:.A ) COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss, CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ; I, Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the, Ci!y Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do heceby certify thst the fore- going resolution wea passed and adopted rt a meeting of the City Plenning Commieaion of the City of Anaheim, held on February 28, 1966, et 2:00 o'clack P.M„ by the following vote of thr members ther~of; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Perry, Rowland. ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Mungall. ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto aet my hend thia lOth day of March, 1`~66. . /.G-•.;, r , /. ~ ~ . 'v. * SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ RESOLUTION N0. 19~i1 R2-A .Z. ~ ~ ~~y~,~ ~ ~~, ,>. ~ ~ ~ RESOLUTxON N0. 1961, SERIES 1965-66 A RESOLUTION OF TN~ CITY ALANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF ANAHGIM RECOMMENDING Tp TNE CITY COl')NCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEiM TNAT PETITION FOR RECL,ASSIF'ICATION N0. 65-66_-89 y~ ppp~OVF;D ._ a i \ 1 ~' i I I. ~ I ~I ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ,I ~ ~ _; ~_:; - ~ ; , ; * ~ ~~ , ~ ~ 1 -~n-•r .1; . ~ »; WHERGAS, the City Planning Corn~riselon of the Clty of Anahclm dld recclve e verifled Petition tor Recl~+saiflce- tlo~froa il+VERNA CIl' ;K, 891 S~uCh Walnut, Apartment 315, Anaheim, California, ~)wner; A. J. SCHUTTE, 4G9•A West Valencla Drive, Fullerton, Califarnia, Agent of certain re~~l property ~'FUated in the City of Ar~aheim, County af O.r.ange, State of Callfornia, describE~d as the we:. 115.G~ reet of that portion of lot 16 in the P, Ao Stanton ~~ract, a;; per map recorded In b:ok 5 pages 23 and 24 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the count.y recorder of s~id county, lyiny southerly of the sou±h line of the north 1.00 ar,le af ~,.id lot; EXCFPT the north 3.00 feet thereof ; end WfIEREAS, the C+ty Plenning Comrr~ission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the Clty of AnahPim on February 28~ 1966, at 2;00 o'clock P.hl, notice of seid public hearing hevi.ng been duly given as required by lew and in eccordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chaptee 18.72, to hear and consider evidence for end agoinst s~id proposed ceclassificetion end to investigate and make findings end recommendations in connection therewltn; and WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself end in its behalE, end efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered e4 said hearing, does find and determine the Following lects: 1. Thet the petittoner propases e raclessification of the above described property from the R-A~ Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Mul~tiple Family Resideni.ial, Zone tp est~.blish a two st~~y ]2 unit apart;ment development. 2. That tha pruposed reclassification is in canformance ~vith the General Plan. 3. That the proposed reclassiEication of aubject property is necessery a7d/or desireble for the orderly end pro- per developurent oE the community. 4. That the proposed ceclessificetiun oE subject property does prope;ly relate to the zunes end their permitted uQes locally established in clos~ proximity to subject property and to tlie zones and their permitted uses generally esteb- lished throughout the community. 5. That no one appear.ed in opposition to subject petition. R-A -1- ~ ~. ~.. -- - .`J''.J~, ~-` +1 ~^~....~.- ~.- +. -..~•_~er,~;::~.e~ '" . . ~~..... . ~ . . . ~~'~AI~ - . -`•~'..' , Xle;~, c ?.pM1e ~ ._..:,~'.,~ i~ \ ; i : ~ p ~ ~ i. ~ V I ~ I I i I ~ ~ ~. i ,. ; <' ~ ! , . NOW, THEREFOf2F:, B~ 1'I' FtESOLV~D th~t the Anaheim Clty Planning Commiaeion doex hereby rocommend io tha Clty Councll of the City of Anahoim thet eubJect Petitlon tor Recleseiticetlon be approved and, by so doing, that Tltle 18-Z~ning of the Aneheim Municlpal Code be amended ta exclude the alx>ve deacrlbed ptoperty ftom lhe ~-A, Ayricultural, Z~ne, and to lncorporat.e sald descrtk~ecl K~ro~erty Lito the ft-3, Mi~lt iE~l e~- Family R~sidential, 'Lone, upon the tollowiny condition, which are hareby found t,o hc <~ necessar•y prerequislte to thQ proposed use af ;;uhject propPrty in orde.r Lo pteserve ll~e safely and genez~al welfaro of the citJ.zens uf the CiCy ot Ar-iaheims 1. That the owner. of sut~jeci; propea~ty sh~711 cieed to the Cit:y of Ana;i~im ~~ st.ri.~~ a1~ lrjri~ 40 fe~t in width, from the cc~ntc~r line of tho ~t:r~et,, alon~ Winston Ro~ad, f'or sCreei. wi~ieniriq purposec. 2. Thai street i.mprovem~~nt plans ~ha].1 be urepared and ali enylnc~~riny ;i~quircinenl:' of' the City of Anaheim along Winnton Road, such a, curb~ and gutters, sld~w~~lks, s,l.rcet gr~~dinq and paving, di~ainage far,llit:ips, oi~ nther appurtenant work rhall he comE;l~~trd ,;~; required Uy tl~c~ City Engineer and in acc~rdance with si:Qnda.rd plans and ,p~cif icatione on f ile Iii tl~c~ off ice of i;he Cil;y Fngineer; and lhai; ~y bond in ,~n ~~mounf: and form sati ,factory to 1;he City c;f Anaheirn sha11 be pos~ed with ~hc City tu guarantee the ~tnst,allation of sald engineering rt~q~.iirement~,. 3. That the owner oi' sub,ject: prop~rty sha11 pay t.o ~Lhe City nf Anaheim the sur~ o!' $2.00 per front foot a].ong Wirst~n R~ad, for ,treet, li.ght:inc~ purE~oses. ~l. That the owner ot' sub,ject. prc~perty shall pay to the City of Anaheim ti~e sum of 15a per Pront foot alang Wlnston Roady for. tree p.lanting ~ur~oses. 5. That one driveway 21 feet ln wicith with a 27 Foot, radius turn-arounrl t,e providc~~~ 6. That Conc~ition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and ~-1, above m~~ntioneci, shall be cornplied witF: ~•;i:htn a period of' 180 days Prom dal,e hezeo(', ~i such further time as the City Counr.il !nay grart. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed ond epproved by me this lOth day of March, 19660 .~ ~~: CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNMG C MISSION ATTE~T: pro Tt•m ~ 1 ~~ ~ / I .~/1 ~/l 1-/ i' X7 i,/i~ .~/ ~ ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ ~ STATE OF CALIFORN:.A ) COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss, CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ; I, Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the, Ci!y Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do heceby certify thst the fore- going resolution wea passed and adopted rt a meeting of the City Plenning Commieaion of the City of Anaheim, held on February 28, 1966, et 2:00 o'clack P.M„ by the following vote of thr members ther~of; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Perry, Rowland. ' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Mungall. ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto aet my hend thia lOth day of March, 1`~66. . /.G-•.;, r , /. ~ ~ . 'v. * SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ RESOLUTION N0. 19~i1 R2-A .Z. ~ ~ ~~y~,~ ~ ~~, ,>. ~ ~ ~