PC 1965-1966-1973~M~T .
R~SOLUTION N0. 1973~ SG~RiGS 196~-GG
A R~SOLUTION OF THE C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION Ol~ TIIG C1TY OF ANAHEIM
THAT f~ETiTiON FOR CONDITIONAL US~ PE;RMIT NO!~,~,3, BF. UGN1~0
_... ,+~ ~
\ ~
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commiisi~on of the City of AnAhoim ~ld recolve n verifled Petition for Conditionnl
UsePermitfrom ARTfII:R H. SIIIPKEY, ET AL, P. 0. i3ox 7, Anaheim, California, Owncrs; JAMES H.
WALKFR, 300 ~Jorth WI lshiro~ Sutte 5, Anaheim, Cal ifo.rnia, Agent of cert:+in real propE~rty
situat~:~d in the City oF An :ieim, County of Orange, ~tai.e of Cal3fornia, described as the
North 220 f~et of the Ea~terly 3 arres of the Westerly 10 ~cr~~s o~ the ~Jorth r0 acres ~f
I.oL l0 of Anaheim ~xte~sion (measurecl from the centerline o(' Center Streel), as sho~,vn on
a map therE~of made by Wm. Hamel and f iled f'or record in Che ofC ice of thr County Recorder
of Los AngelFS County, Caltfornia
; c~nd
~' i
~
:; ~
~
• -.-~
; *
. ~ ~
1
;s,..-
:'. i
;.,
'.:. :,
WHER.EAS, the City Planning Commisaic-n did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the C.ity of Anc~heim on
Marcr~ 14, 1966 et 2:00 o'clock P,M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given es rec~uired by
low and in eccordance with the pmvieions of the A,tlaheim Municipal Code, Chaptet 18,64, to hear and consider evidence
for and agelnst sald proposed conditional use nnd to inve~stigate and make findlnqs end recommendatfons in connection
therewith; end
WNEREAS, said Commi~slon, after due lpspection, investigetion, ~nd sludy medc by itsel[ c~nd in its be}ielf,
and after due conaideretion of all ~vide~ce end reports offered at seid heering, doex find nnd determine the following fiict.s;
1, That the ptoposed use is propetly one for which a Conditionel Use Permit is euthorized by this Code, to wit;
establish a walk-up, drive-in restaurant on subjec~ property,
2. That tf;e proposed use will have a deleterious affecton tha adjoininq land uses
and t.he growth and development of ti~e area ir. which it is proposed to i~e located.
3. That the ~~.atian of the proposed drive-in would be detrimFntal to the integrity of
the are3, since l,t, rr: are no adequate means of shielding the residential uses established
in clos~_~ proximity from the iights, noises, and vdors assoclaLed with the drive-in restaurant
automobiles and patrons.
4. That the proposed use would be incompatible with tl~e already ~stablished residential
neighborhood to the south and the business ~nd professional development northerly of subject
property.
5. That drive-in restaurant~ should be located in shoppina centers where otner
commercial structures w~ll provide an adequate buffer for the liqhts, and where noises :rom
automobile traffic wou~.1 not have a deleterious affect on any adjacent residential uses.
6. That three E~ersons appeared in opposition to subject petition.
C 1-D
. ...,,~ .
-1-
~'
~ ~~- ;,
~ `, ~
i
~
j
~
~
~ ..
i
1 ,I
~
i
. ,,,
i
.'`
,
• ' ,
*
i
'~
G r
~ ~
~~~ ~;%r~'~`f
,.
C ;r;.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that thc Aneheim C:ity rianning Cammission does hcreby cleny subject
Petition tor Conditlonel Use Pcrmit on the b~sie of the eforementioned Eindings,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ia signrd And approved by me this 24th day Of h1arch~ 1966.
~ ~
'CHAIRMAN ANAFiETM1S C1TY PLA NING COh1h11SSI0N
ATTEST:
/~/l~/!-t~ ~~/ ~L~-ca~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNtA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Planrting Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby~ cerlify thr,t the for~-
going resolution wes pessed and edopted at e meeting oE the City Plan~ing Commission of :he City of pnaheim, held on
March 14, 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.~vl., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Carnp, Gaurr, lierbst, Nfungall, Perry, f3owland.
NOES: CO[dMISSIONF.RS: None.
ABSENT: COMb1ISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 24th day of March~ 1966.
~ 2~~ ~..~~:
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIbI CiTY PGANNING CU11A1ISSION
RESOLUTION NO.
C2-D
.2.
~
~M~T .
R~SOLUTION N0. 1973~ SG~RiGS 196~-GG
A R~SOLUTION OF THE C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION Ol~ TIIG C1TY OF ANAHEIM
THAT f~ETiTiON FOR CONDITIONAL US~ PE;RMIT NO!~,~,3, BF. UGN1~0
_... ,+~ ~
\ ~
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commiisi~on of the City of AnAhoim ~ld recolve n verifled Petition for Conditionnl
UsePermitfrom ARTfII:R H. SIIIPKEY, ET AL, P. 0. i3ox 7, Anaheim, California, Owncrs; JAMES H.
WALKFR, 300 ~Jorth WI lshiro~ Sutte 5, Anaheim, Cal ifo.rnia, Agent of cert:+in real propE~rty
situat~:~d in the City oF An :ieim, County of Orange, ~tai.e of Cal3fornia, described as the
North 220 f~et of the Ea~terly 3 arres of the Westerly 10 ~cr~~s o~ the ~Jorth r0 acres ~f
I.oL l0 of Anaheim ~xte~sion (measurecl from the centerline o(' Center Streel), as sho~,vn on
a map therE~of made by Wm. Hamel and f iled f'or record in Che ofC ice of thr County Recorder
of Los AngelFS County, Caltfornia
; c~nd
~' i
~
:; ~
~
• -.-~
; *
. ~ ~
1
;s,..-
:'. i
;.,
'.:. :,
WHER.EAS, the City Planning Commisaic-n did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the C.ity of Anc~heim on
Marcr~ 14, 1966 et 2:00 o'clock P,M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given es rec~uired by
low and in eccordance with the pmvieions of the A,tlaheim Municipal Code, Chaptet 18,64, to hear and consider evidence
for and agelnst sald proposed conditional use nnd to inve~stigate and make findlnqs end recommendatfons in connection
therewith; end
WNEREAS, said Commi~slon, after due lpspection, investigetion, ~nd sludy medc by itsel[ c~nd in its be}ielf,
and after due conaideretion of all ~vide~ce end reports offered at seid heering, doex find nnd determine the following fiict.s;
1, That the ptoposed use is propetly one for which a Conditionel Use Permit is euthorized by this Code, to wit;
establish a walk-up, drive-in restaurant on subjec~ property,
2. That tf;e proposed use will have a deleterious affecton tha adjoininq land uses
and t.he growth and development of ti~e area ir. which it is proposed to i~e located.
3. That the ~~.atian of the proposed drive-in would be detrimFntal to the integrity of
the are3, since l,t, rr: are no adequate means of shielding the residential uses established
in clos~_~ proximity from the iights, noises, and vdors assoclaLed with the drive-in restaurant
automobiles and patrons.
4. That the proposed use would be incompatible with tl~e already ~stablished residential
neighborhood to the south and the business ~nd professional development northerly of subject
property.
5. That drive-in restaurant~ should be located in shoppina centers where otner
commercial structures w~ll provide an adequate buffer for the liqhts, and where noises :rom
automobile traffic wou~.1 not have a deleterious affect on any adjacent residential uses.
6. That three E~ersons appeared in opposition to subject petition.
C 1-D
. ...,,~ .
-1-
~'
~ ~~- ;,
~ `, ~
i
~
j
~
~
~ ..
i
1 ,I
~
i
. ,,,
i
.'`
,
• ' ,
*
i
'~
G r
~ ~
~~~ ~;%r~'~`f
,.
C ;r;.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that thc Aneheim C:ity rianning Cammission does hcreby cleny subject
Petition tor Conditlonel Use Pcrmit on the b~sie of the eforementioned Eindings,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ia signrd And approved by me this 24th day Of h1arch~ 1966.
~ ~
'CHAIRMAN ANAFiETM1S C1TY PLA NING COh1h11SSI0N
ATTEST:
/~/l~/!-t~ ~~/ ~L~-ca~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNtA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Planrting Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby~ cerlify thr,t the for~-
going resolution wes pessed and edopted at e meeting oE the City Plan~ing Commission of :he City of pnaheim, held on
March 14, 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.~vl., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Carnp, Gaurr, lierbst, Nfungall, Perry, f3owland.
NOES: CO[dMISSIONF.RS: None.
ABSENT: COMb1ISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 24th day of March~ 1966.
~ 2~~ ~..~~:
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIbI CiTY PGANNING CU11A1ISSION
RESOLUTION NO.
C2-D
.2.
~