Loading...
PC 1965-1966-19751975, SERIES 1965-G6 RESOLUTiON NO, ,_ I .~-;:id~'-1 ~t ~ ~~ I ; ~ _ f _ I I j `~ i ~.; 1 j ~ I y( I ( ~ ~ ~ ~_ `,~ A RESOLUTION OF TH~ CITY PLANNING COMM1SS10N OF THG ('I7'Y OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE C(TY COUNCII. OF Ty E CiTY OF ANAHEIM TfiAT PETITION FOR RFCLASSIFICATION N0,65'°6-9~t p~ pppRpVED µl}{EREAS, the City Planning Commiselon of the City of Anaheirn did recefve a verlffed Petition fo~ Reclassi(ica- tinntrom ERICH WINGER, 25f~7 West Lincoln AvenuP, Anaheim, California, Owner; QENSON RCALTY, 1~03 N. Old Tustin Avenue, 5anta Ana, California, Ag~nt of certain real property situated in the City of Anahc~im, C~unty of Orange, State of California, descr.ibed as thc~ west half of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 7, Township ~ South, Range lU West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as per map recorded in bo4k 51 page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county; EXCCPT any po.rtion thereuf included within the East ~0.00 acxes of said southwest quarter of the southwest quarter; ALSO EXCEPT that portion thereof described in the deed t~ the City of Anaheirn, recorded June 19, 1959 in:book 47G4 page 110 of Official Records I anll WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public he~ring at the City Hell in the City o( Anaheim on MarCh 14~ 1966, ut 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said iublic hearin hevin been dul ( B• C~ y given as required by lew and in accordance with the provisions of t6e Anaheim Alunicipel Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence Eor and egainst said proposed reclassification and to investigete and meke findings end recommendations in connection the:ewith; end WNEREAS, said Comm;ssion, aEter due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and repotts offered at seid heoring, does find and determine the Eollowing facts; 1. Thet the petitionet proposes a reclassification of the above described property from the R-,~, Agricultural, Zone to the C-1, General Commercial, Zone, to permit the estabiishment of a ser;~ice station. 2. That the proposed reclasslfication is in conforrnance with the General Pla~;: 3. 1'hat the proposed reclassiFication s}iall encornpass the service stati~n site only,. as requested by the petitioner. ~J.. That the propo~ed reclessification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable fur the orderly and pro- per developrr~ent oE the community. ~., That the proposed reclassification oE subjec4 property does properl}~ relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estab- lished throughout the community. 5. That the pro~osed reclassification of subject property does require ded;cation for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of traffic, which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circuiation element of the General Plan. 7. That no one appeared in opposition to subject p~titicn. w ~tx. R-A -1- ~ h NOW, 1'FIC.REFORI:, [~E IT lu.~OLV~D that i:he Anahtim City Pla~,ning Cornrnis~ion doee~ hereby rr~cumrnend Lo Lhe Ctt,y CoUncil oF the Ctty of Anahelm that sub3ect petition for ~eclassific7t.lon be app.rovc~d for thc~ sc~rvice ,tat,ion sit.e only, and, by so doing, that Tltle 1R Zoning ~F thc~ Anahelm Municipal Cod~ be amended to exclude the above d~~scribed property frorn the R-A, Agricultural, Zone, and Lo incorporale said descrjbed prnperty into Lhc~ Cwl, General Commercial, Zone, upan the followin9 conditior~s wh~ch ai•e her.eby found to be a ncrc~~„ary prerequisiLe to thc proF~osed use of' sub~er.t properi.y in orde.r Lo pres~~rvc~~ Lh~~ saFet.y and gencral H~olfare of l,hc~ citixens of f:he C~t;y of Anahei.~nt 1. That the owne.r ~f sub~Ject property shill deed to t.he Cit.y of Anahcrjrn a strip of land 53 ;eet in wldl;h, from the cente.r line of the sirael, along Magnolia Avenue, for street. widening purpoaes, including a 25-fool radius r.~rner zeLurn. 2. Tha~ slreet imprnvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering reqiairem~~nts of the C~.ly of Anaheim alony Magnolia Avenue ind Lincoln Avc~nue, aur.h a, c~irbs and guLter•s, sidewalks, ,tree~~ grading and E7aving, draina~e far,ili.ties, or other ~~ppurLenant work sha]1 be completed as rc~quired by ttie City Fngin~~E~r and in acr.ordince wiLh sl.anclard plans and °° specifications on file in the offlce of lhe CiLy ~nginea.r; and lhat a bond in an arno~ant and -(~ form sai.~,fact.ory to the City of Anaheim shall be po,t,ed with the City to guarantee lhe "= installation of said engineering requiremr.~nts. \;` 3. That the owner oF sub,ject properLy shall pay to the City of Anahei.m the swn of 22.OU I per f.ront r"oot along Magnolia Avenue and Lincoln Aven~e, for street ]ightinq purpuses. _ 4. That the owner of subject pro~~crty shall PaY to l.l~e CICy of Anal~eim the surn of 15Q~ per froni: foot, along Magnol.ia Avenue and Lincol.n Avenue, for tzee planting purposes. ~ 5. T17at trash st.orage areas shall be provided in accordance witl-~ app.roved plans on fil~ ;` _ with the office of ~he Director nf Putblic 'Norks. 6. That fire hydrants shall be installEd as I~~quired and deterr~ined to be necessary by { the Chief of the Fire Uepartrnent. ~ 7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and A, above mentioned, shall be complied wit:h witf~in a period oF 1fZ0 days From the date hereof, or such fuzth~r tirne as the City Council may grant. ~ ~;. That Condition Nos. 5 and 6, above ment9oned, shal. .;e com lied w3Lh ` ~` p prior Lo f inal ; building inspection. ~ 9. That any air conditioning facilities shall be pr~~perly shi~]ded frorn view from abuttznq streets. 10. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ~~ccordance with adopted Service Station Minimum Sfte Development Standards, pric;r to final building inspec,tion. 11. That subject property shall b~~ developed substan+:ially in accordance with plans anc~ specifications on file with the Cily of Anaheim, marked Exh;bit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and the colored rendering submitted by the ~~etitioner. ~ ~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOfV is sic~ned and a~prove by me this ^_4th day of h9arch, 1966. i ; ~ ~~ - z f. ATTEST: HAIRMAN ANAfIEIM CITY PL NING MMTSSION ~ A --~/ / C/l~I ~:2.,~ %~2~-~~/ ~ SFCRETARY ANAHEIM ~ITY PLANNING CAMMISSION STATE OF CALI FORPJI A) COUIJTY OF ORANGE ) S,. ' • C'ITY OF ANAHEIM ) i ' i I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheirr., do hereby I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a n~eeting of the City Planning ~ Comrnission of the City of Anaheim, held on March 14, 1966, at 2:00 0'clock P.M., by the ~ ~ fo:,owing vate of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIOIvERS: Allred, C~mp, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Perry, Rowland. ~ ~ + NOES COMMISSIONERS: I~one. i ABS ENT: COA~MISSIONERS: None. ~ IN 'NTI'NESS WHEREOfi, I have hereunto set: my hand Chis 24th day of March, 1966. ., ~, ~ ; ~ ~ ~~~ 2 ;/li / ` ~ ~ /"..~~,E~-% i SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION { Res. No. 1975 _2_ : - ~~ i i w i ; ~' r ~ ~ .; w"'~; <,~~' ,~r. `F.,..-: X ~; ~ ~.~1., ..i.;:. ,a~ ~ ~