PC 1965-1966-2010I
_ ,
j
RESOLUTION N0, `~1i~ ~ ~F RI cS 1965-6~
___
A RESOLUTIbN UF THE CITY PLANNING COIWMISSION QF THE: C1TY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENbING TO THC CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~~:_ BE APPHOVLU
WHEREA5, the Clty Planning Commiseion of the City of Anal~eim did recelve a verlEled Petltlon Eor ReclasaiEice-
tion from MANUEL DE ALMEIDA
5385 L~t
h
,
s
op Street, Cypress, California, Owner; JAMES IC. SCHUt.E:R,
91A E~~~t N.atella Avenue, Anaheim9 Califor
nia
A
ent of
C
i
,,~:~~+!'s .
,
g
car
a
n real property situ~ted in the
City of Anaheim, County af Oranye, State of California
describ
d
'~
~ y ,
e
as the East d95~00 feet, of
the northe~~st quar.ter cr the southeast quarter of Lhe northeast quarter of Section 15, Township
4 Sout.h. Ranye 11 Wes
th
~
~~ ~n
e Ranr,ho Los Covotes , as
of
M! scellaneous Maps, in the of f ice of the co~,nt
y recorde
r
fas
G
u
n
S
a
~
, .
r
o
ald
CO
nty;
~XCEPT
tho
North
25~~00 fAQt thereof R AL;U EXCFf~T the South ~ 76.~OG feet thereof
I
i
_
l, ~
1
I. ,
\
i
4 ~
r '~
i
!
i
i
, I
end
~
~ WHEREl:S, the Clty Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim en
Ar. r i 1 25
1966
2
1
'
;'` I ,
, f~t
:1
0 o
clock P.M. notice of said
ear~ne having been duly given es required by
lew and in accordence with th
e
b
'~`~" i
. _ e provisions o( the Anaheim Munici
1
Code
P , C pter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for and against said proposed reclassifi
ti
''~ ~
;
i ce
on And to im~estigate and make findings end recommendations in connection
therewith; and
~
~ WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itself end in its behalf
and
i
, ,
after due consideration oE all evidenr,e and reports offered et seid hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
•`~ 1. That the petitioner proposes a reclessification of the above described property from the R-•h, AGRIC.'ULTURAL
•' .~ ~
ZONE to the R-3~ MUL7IPI.E FAMILY RE;IDEKfIAL, ZONE Co establish ten four-~f,lex units on
subject property.
~'
i
1 '
i
,
: 2. That the proposed u:.e i,inconformance wit:-z the General Plan~
i
~ ~
.f
~
'
i
. That the proposed rectessification of subject property is necessary end/or desirdble for the ordedy end pro-
per developnrent of the community.
4. Thet the proposed reclassificetion of subject property does properly relate to the zones end thpir permitted
uses locally esteblfshed in close proximity to sabject property aad to the zones and their permitted uses generell
esteb-
. y
lished throughout the community.
~ 5. That the proposed rec.lassification of subject property requires the dedication and
.,~
';` improvement of abutting streets in accordance witl-~ the Circulation Element of the General
Plan
d
t
th
,
ue
o
e anticipated increase in traffic which tvi11 be generated by the intensi-
f
~ ~ ::ation of land use~
~;
~~
~
~ 6~ Tt~at no one ~~peared in opposition tn su~je,.'~ petition.
~ `. ~ ~
~
i~
1
- R-A -l-
' ,;
r
4
•~:~__- --~;-~-r, ----------- - -
. ~~•. •~a~+W':, ~.e .,,~'I.i; ~.
. . _ . _v~
`~-' ~ ~
~
NnR', THIsRCFORE, B~ ; RESOLV~D thet the Anaheim City P1, ~,ng Commiseion doea hereby rocommend
to the Clty Council of the Clt~ of Anahelm thot eubject Pedtion for Reclassiticetlo ~ be apptoved and, by s~ doing,
thut Tltle 18-'Loning of the Anuhelm Municipsl Code be amended to exrlude the obo re deacrfbed property from tha
R-A, Agrlcul tural, GonN, ,,nd to incorporat~ sai.d described ~~z~~perLy into the H~3, Mul tiwlc~-
Family RQSideni:ial, Lone, upon ~he folluwfng conditio~~s wl,i.ch are herQby fuund to be ~7
nece~sar.y prcrequisfte to the proposed use of ~ubject proK~e.rty In order i;o preserve t:he
safety and genei•al welfare of the ci.t.ixens of tho City of' An~~heimt
l~ 'lhat a rinal Trar,~ Map of sub,~ocL propr~rty l~e appr~veci by i he C;i.ty Couneil ~~r~d
r~~cordr_d in t tie off icc a}' t.he Orange County Recurcler~
2., That. lrash ~,i,oraye a.reas sh~~ll be prov~.ded ln acrordance ~v1 LIl .'lF)~~T'(7VF.'d plans
~~n f Ile wil,f~ l:he ~t't'1c;e oC t.he Dircctoi• oF Publ ic Work ,..
3~ 'f'ha* the owner(~) oti ,uk~}ec;C ~~roperty shall pay t;o t.he City of An~~hei~n the sum
of' $l5„Oll p~z- ~lwellinq tmil to be usrd f~r park and .recrer~ti.on pur~oses, saici ~~,~noiant to
be p.~id ~+t t.hE time I.he b~.iildin~~ E~ermiC is issued~
„, :~h~-.
~- .
s~
..~, ,
l
~
~
i
~
~~
`~~
~
i
~
TH~ HC -EGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this th day oE May, 1966~
~ ~~, ~~
HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
,~~~„~ 1~~
,
SECRE'fARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMhIISSION
STATE OF CALIP'ORNIA )
COUNTY CF ~RANGE ) sg,
CITY OF ANAH£IM )
I, Ann Kre:~;, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneh~im, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution wes pessed and edopted et a m~eting of the Ctty Plenaing Commission of the City oE Anaheim, held on
April 25~ 1966, et 2:00 o'clock P.M.; by the following vote of the membera theteof;
' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLR;~D, GAUER, HERRST, MUNGALL9 PFARY, ROWLAND, CAh;P~
NbES: COMMISSIONEfiS: NONE,
ABSENT: COMMIS3IONERS: NONEo
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend thla 5th day of M3y, 1966.
;
A ~ ';
I'
~
--L•iG~~~?/Yt.~ ~~~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOI.,~7TION NO. 2010
R2-A
'e' "e'-
..7.
~
~