PC 1965-1966-2085RESOI.U1`ION N0,
~Uf~S, Series 196ti-GG
A RESOLUTION OF' TyE CITY pLANNIN(y ('~pApyISSIQN OP' THE CITY OF ANAHEIN
TH~T pE'I'(TION F'OR VARWiC~ N0. 1803 g~ DENiED
. .~ :eki- .
' ' ;;
:~~ i
~ ,
j ~~r
~
i ,
`
~.
WH~REAS, th~ Clty Plartning Commlr~lon ot the CAty ot Ana!-~im ~ld receive o veritlod Petltloe (or V~dene~ trom
~~NQOLN PLAZA DEV~LOPMENT OOM~PANY, 61~ South Flower Street, I.ps An~e]es, C~liforn~a, OWnerS,
F, certain rea 1 proparty situated in ~ the City of F.: ,aheim, County of Orange, St~te of
California, as descr. ibed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though
set fo.rth in .f ull.
; flfld
WHEREAS, the Clty Plenning Commiselon did hold e public h~edng at the City Hpll in the City o! Ancheim on
June 20, 1966, ~t 2:00 o'clock P.M., notlce ot eald public heating heving been duly glven ea requlrcd by
lew end in ocoorde-~ce valth the provlslone o! the Meheim Municipel Code. Chnpter 18.68, to hear end coneidor evldenc~ for
and egainst seid proposed variance end to lnveaUgete nnd make findingA end recommendatlons in oonnectlon thesewlth;
ond
WHEREAS, said Commiasion, atter due lnspection, investigetion, end study mede by itself end In Ita behelf,
and aEter due conald~ation of ell evidence end ceports otEered ~;~ said hearing. dnes find end determine the Eollovrieg
fects:
1. Thet the petitioner cequests a vedence from the Anehelm Municlpel Code: to permit signina of a shopp:: -,n
center. =
SL'CIIOy 1R.b?_.09U(B-1) - which ]irr'ts the r.umber of free standing signs or,
any parce: ( 1 sig; : permitted - 2 signs propo;ed).
SEG?lON 1~.62.U90(B-1~ - which limits the rnir~imum distance between free-
standing signs to 300 feet; 115 feet proposed.
,I '
~
i i
~
i
~~ i `
i
;` I
`
,; .
,
. ,
*
<;
~ .,~r
~~, i~
~
:r
-
~.,;,.!
~::~:
:.,.
~:;;f
. ,.;
~ECTION 1R~62.O~U(B-5) - which requires that free-standinq si~ns be lor,ated
no closer ~o the -:orth property line ttian a d~stance
equal to a0% of t~_e width of a parcel (120 feet r~quired);
t perR~it one free-standing sign 37 feet from the north
property line.
2. I'hat there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstance~ or co~ditions applicab;e
to the property involved or to t}~e intended use of the property that do not apply ge~erally
t~~ ~he preperty or class oF use in the same vicinit y and zone.
3. 1'hat the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
a substantia.l property right possessFd by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
and denied to the property in question.
~. That subject prooerty is a portion of a large commercial parcel being developed in
phases, and if each developed portion requests waiv ers from the Sign Ordinance, the area
would be developed i.nto a",jungle" of signs which would be rnaterially detrimental to the
public welfare and injurious to other property in t:~e vicinity of subject property.
5. That the Sign Ordinance permits adequate sign ino of subject property wittiin an
integrated sigr..
6. That no one appeared in opposition to si~bject petition.
V 1-D
. ~.,~-
-1-
~
VCS1Q0;
~
'~
y
.~iLTLDA H~MM~RL~N~~ a marr~.ed woman, who aaquired t~.~le as HULDA NIE~ER,
an L:ndivided 1./2 inberesb; ARTHUR E. 1-I~MM~KLING and HULDA M. HEN~:RLING,
3~+•5~~ of 509~, and in EMMA MEGER as to the r~mainder.
The land re(erred to in thta report is 1n the siate ot Calilornla, county oI Orange ~ ..
~ ~ r/ Nove r Q .
, °s~J 3 ~ x965 .
Shopping Ceril:er Site . ~
Deecription ~l ~
r ~
~ ii~t portion of the East Half of the Northeast •
_.. ; , ~u~.rte~ of th~ NorCYlec~; t f~G~.rter o:C Seotion 17, ~ '
.~ownehip 4 Souxh, Rr~n~;e 10 I~leet, partly in ~he ~ '~~ '
~~ Rancho 9an Juc 9e 9anta Ana and pArtly in the ~~ •'
, Rancho Loo Coyotee, ss ehown on a mAp thereof . ~~ ~
. recorded in Book 51, Page 10~ Miecellaneoue Mape, •
records of Orunge County, C~liforr~la and dee- '~
~ acibed ae follows: ' ' .
~ Be6lnning at A paint in a line parallel with ~~ •' ~
'~ .~ And dietbnt Westerly 5j.00 feet meaeured at ~~
~ i ri~;h~ anglee from the Ec~sterly line of said •~ ~
~~
; ; ,
StcGion 17, eaid point bein~r the Northerly •
~
I terminus of a curve concavc Nortti~resterly
; i • hAVing a radius or 15.00 feet, the Southerly
4; terminus also being tan~ent to a line parallel ~.
- with and dietxnt Northerly 45.00 feet, measurod
~;_ . at right anglee from the Southerly line of eaid ~ '
' Northeast quarter of the NortheASt quqrter; •
E. I : thence Southerly a1Qng said t~ngent curve through .
'~ ~
' ~ a central angle oi' 90° 24~ 54~~ an arc distance ~
~ of 23.67 feet ta eaid Southerly terminue; thenae ~ ~
'" ~ i alon~Z eai2
last mentioned pArallel line North ~
~
~ ~ . ~~
.
~ g9 33 3 West 593 95 feet to the Weet line ;
+ • of eaid Ea~t half; thence along eaid Weet line,
North 460.00 Peet; thence 8outh ~9• 33' 32'~ ~
'
' East 609.27 feet to said parallel line whiah ~ !'
paseee through the point oP .beginning; thenoe
~' j,
` i ~
.~~~ ~
alon eaid~._ara].le .,.. .,.... . . _„ . . ,~ ,.. .~,. . ,....,.....t~:-. --~II
~
~ p 1 lina, sou~h t,~ t~l 34 Weeti .'
'
a
,
~ .
. 4~.
• I
9 t
eet ~o the. point ot begiraning. ' s
. .
1, ~ .
j •
,
~
~.. ~~
~., _ ~
~ •
• .
' ~ , '
' "~
~
''i { R
i'1!k
i ~~ s
(
i
~
' '"~
~
,
~ ' `~ J
;:A,
` _~,.,..
~ , i
~
''
r ~
- ~ .
~
E
~
~..y~ _~_1y~ :.
. aui,au~r~~rwa~.:cux~.~.w~«v~ .....t;vc...i ..,._:,~..-~~_~ a~.i.~.. .. ,.. ~ :.,....r ,.,~.~.~.r.. .,.,.u . v..~,._ ::.. .,.<.w«xr .. n,.,,
~~~~~""'~+~~.y.jl~,~'vLiYi V'
_.. - . ,...._.....,.,.
~. . :. ~ ~ .
~ ~t^-Y~
~~~~
~ ~ . J~ f • d~i,:Tt~
,
~
~
~
l
i ~ .... '
n
i ~ a 1
~ ! ~ 4 uuivu ,.y ... . ~ .... ....... ...
I~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Flenning Commisston doea hereby deny subject
Petitlon tor Varionce on the besis oE the elorementioned Eindings.
THE FORF:GOING RESOLUTION is siqned and npproved by me this ~~th day of Jtine, 1966.
/
: '
, ~~ ~~~~-
, c.., t . ,. ' ,,
CHA RMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLA.NNIN COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~
~ ~..~ . - ~~J' ~
SECREI'ARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
7+ .~r, ~; Secretary of thr City Plenning Commi~~ion of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was pessed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
June 20~ 1966 at 2;00 o'clock p,-K,~ by the following vote of the members th~ereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Mungail, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONGRS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WFiEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand thig 3Gth day of June~ 1966.
RESOLUTION Nd. 2~85
V 2-D
_ ~' /> ~> ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY FLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
~; . ,~
i
_ ~
. ~,*t-- . T -- - .~-...,...,,.~.,,,..~a
~~~
. . ~-..i:: ° apn.~~ ~p.;.
F~