PC 66-154RESOLUTION NO.
PCb6-l~a
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING CO:,,;,115SION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO.~"%-07-39 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Reclassificn-
tionfrom JOHN A, tiND BESSIE L. EAKIRy 2100 South Eucii~9 Anaheim, Californiay Otiti•ners; HARRY
KNISELY, 1523 West Katella Avenuey Anaheim, California, Agent of certair, rea: property situatei
:~~ in the City of Anaheim, County of OrangeY State of Califorr.iay described as tiie Nor•tt:z^:y 1_95,00
j feet o: the West 203.00 feet of the Southwest quarter of Section 289 ToNnenip 4, Soutt~, Range
~ ~ 10 West in the Rancho Las Bolsas as snowr. on a map re~.orded in Uook `~i~ page :C~ of Miscallaneous
Maps, re::ords of' Oranye Cotinty
i
1
~
i -
I
' ! ; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of pneheim on
Novernber 21~ i9b6y at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given as required
'I by law end in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider evi-
'.I dence (or end against seid proposed reclassificatian end to investigete and make findings and recommendetions in
; connection therewith: and
WHEREAS, said Commissian, etter due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself and in its behelf,
and after due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does (ind and determine the following
facts:
:}~
~
~ ,
i *
~i .~x
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclessificetion of the above described property from the R-Aa A9= i cul tural,
Zone ±,o ti~e C-19 General Con~r~zrc.alY Zone to establisi: a sezvi~ e st at.ion..
2~ Tt:at ti~e sccpe of t.i~e proposed ~e!-iassific:a! ion, ir approv~d9 ~io?s r.ot ~n~a:rant
an amer,dma•' to theGeneral Pian at !ha F.resent time, i:o:•;eve:y its re:at:or,sl:io to t;.e
General Plan symbol will be :ons:dered dt tne r,ext ar,rn~a: re•.iev:~
3o That the p.oposed iac:assif'ir_at_ion oi siibject propeity is not cecessary an; o~
desirable for the orierly ar,d arJppr ;ieve:Opme;~t. Of t.he cou.n;unity..
4. Th.~t t}.e propose~y reclass:fic~tion •r.~oui:i set an ur.desirai~le E,Tcce,tznr ior ,o~:~::,err:al
uses !'or t;;e balar,ce oi t.he undeveloped property s~irro~.~na:ny property ±o ;t,e -o~.:;h, ea=;,
and w_~i of ~ui~ject propt: t,y.
5. Tt~:at studies made in !::a es1.,-,~listur,ent of thaGe:!ecal Plar, ir.n:;ateci t;.,a, +!~e a:-ea
in Nhi~i~ subject property is lor.ated 'nas ;nore tnari adeq~.~ate con~n;erci~al taril;ties to i~=r.:1~
the existiny and potentiai resider!tia: de~:~elopmer.t of the a: e~~
6. That. service stat.ior~s a:a cor,sidered one o~ the heaviest con:n,ercidi ~.ises, an.i !o
approve t.hai. type o!' con:mercial ~ise :vo~,~!d ercourage r~quests !'or ot:~er cou~n:erc;ai use;;n
t.'.e ar~a.
7. Tnai ona pe:son ao~eare;i i;; opposition to sui~jer,t. pet:tior.~
R1-D .1_
!
. _.. ,.. ....., . .
. , . .. }~ ~.~~
5
.~%~-~
;;
~~ , :~
~ ~
~ ' ~.~
i :;
~
l _ ;~'
~
'a
;s
NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
•~ ^ to the City Council af the City of Anaheim thet subject Petition for Reclassification be denied on the basis of the
~ t aforementioned findings.
I
~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this st da}' o.° Deceir:ber~ 1966.
~
I
i )
~ .t~ - ~-->,c~ ~
I AIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY P ANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
.
~
t
.ax
ia
/~ J /
-r - ( ' J /.~'[_ /1%~L~ Gti"','
SfCRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C'~': `SSION
STATE UF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANA~iEIM ;
I~ Ann Ki ~b,, Secretary of the City Plennire Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was pussed and ndopted et a meet4ng uf the City Plenning Commission ot the City of Anaheim, held on
1~ovEml~:r 21~ '.9~6~ at 2:00 o'elock P.hi., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: All:ed, Gauer, Herbsty Mungall, Ro•,vlar.d, Ca,n.E,.
NOES: COMMISSIONGRS: P;on e.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Farano.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto ~et my hnnd this ist d~y pp Decemi;tr. l~~co~
RESOLUTION NO. 1 ~4
R2-D
~~` 1 t..-l ~' /2 c <<.
~i L
SECRETARl' A.NAHEIM CITY PLANN[NG COMMISSfON
-2-
,..._..,. ,,..,:.,~ ..
_ ,
. , ..
' 'i
-- - , . -~ ars:..
~