PC 66-19RESOLUTION NO
PeC. 60-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANki-TEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANC~ NO. 1R13 BE GRANTED
VIHEREAS, the City Pler.ning Cemmission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance
from ~i'NRLE-S tiir LUEd P.niD THO1viA5 WEEUA, 1664 West Broadv;ay, Anaheim, California, Owners; WILLIAM
','i0i.~4CRPi~ i 3? Suut.l: _uclid, Suite H, Anaheim, Californi~, Ar~ert of certain re:sl property situated
~. i.te Ci~•y o; Anal,ei,~, CoLir:~y of O:ange, State ci California, r.es~ribed as ±'~e West R0.00 feet
:!:.`-- ~'ol ~;•`~ :=5'~-G~"! `eei, of Lot li ot He.ien and Lynch's Subdi~~~ision of t;he West haJ.f oF Section
:i~, in To~,vnshi;; ~'- scui:.h, Rar.~_~e 10 West., San Bernardinu Base U~ci Aleridian, as shcwi; on a map
i.i:e.; e.;; re:-~~,S~d i,~ book 442, page 15R, Deeds~ records or" Lcs P.nr,,eles County3 Calif'ornia
; and
WHEi2~:AS, ihe City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on Ji~i':' :"~, ]`?Gi~ at 2;00 o'clock P,M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as n:quired
by law and in accorc~ance with the provisions ot the Anaheim Municioal Code, Chapter 18.68, to heer and consider
evidence for and ~gainst said proposed variance and to investigete and make findings and recommendations ;n connec-
tion therewith; and
WIiEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its bebalf,
and after due consideration of ell evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and detennine the foliowing
Eacts:
1. Thxt the petitioner requests a veriance from the Anahesm Municipel Code *o permi t the expansion of
a:: exis'tiny cFFi:;e buil9ing on subject property:
SECTIO?J_18.40.0?0~2-a-5) - 10-;oot minin~~~:m side yard seti:ack required -
S-foot setk;ack proposed.
i : 2. Thar there are exceptiona( or extraordinary circumstances or cenditions applicable to the property involved
~~ or to the intended use of the pronerry that do not epply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity
i and zone.
• j 3. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity end zone, and denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance wil! not be meterially detrimentnl to the public welfare or ir.jurious to the prop-
' erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
I
' .:':;at ;h~. wa''.;cr will merely perm?t the con~in~~at.ior. oi tne existinn k~.~ilciino
~ ~ __~_.
~ '~~I~i~.h ~~as '~cen develop2d v~ith a 5-,`oot setback.
~ .:f~=t iio ~n.. appeared i.n opposition to sub;ect petitiun.
i~
~
I
~
~x
V~-G
-1-
~
5
e
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RE50LVED thet the Anaheim Ca~F f~lerinsMg c:omm~aad~;t •'nr: h•uc::E,y ~;:ant subject
Petition for Veriance, upon the following cundltions whieh ~r,.. ~YpfCS•7'j four.d ta b~ d nec:esci..;y fiy«-.tr;ui .ita tr~ ; r;e pro-
posed use of the subject propedy in order to preserve the sa~sttr ausl ~ccic~,a! weltare o€;he+ t';~.,scv~a. ~sx th~ ;:tt, :,f
Anaheim.
,' lo That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheirn th~ ~urn of
15~ per front foot along Broadway, for tree planting purposes prior to ti~e time that the
Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever
occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or Cit}- Council may grant.
2o That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Workso
3o That the existing structure and the proposed addition sliall conform to the
Uniform Bui?ding Code as adopted by the City of Anaheim.
4. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from
view from abutting streetso
5e That Condition Nos. 2 and 4, above mentioned, shzll be complied with prior to
final building inspectiono
6o That su~jact property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 2 th day of July~ 1960.
~~~ ~ ' c 'i -
HA~ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann ;Kr,eb,$; •,. . Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was passed end adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
July lft~ 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, HERBST, MUNGALL, ROWLAND, CAMP.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NO~~E.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PERRY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 2Hth day of July, 1966.
• I RESOLUTION NO. 66-19
V2-G
,.'.~
., ~ ~
~, ,
--+
I -
<: ; ~
~:- ~ ~
' .;
-t
;. ~ ~
~
,~
~i.. ~
~` ..__ .:.e>. . i "----~.
~~~-~R~ ~~" -v/
SECRETAR~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
~
~