Loading...
PC 66-91PCco-`f: RESOLUTION NO. _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETIT.ON FOR VARIANCE NO. 1R? 7 BE DENiED ~ .._.a4`~ . ~ _ { * t~ ' , .Ax WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Veriance from DOYLE HILL AIJD DELMAR JACKSON, 322~ South cu~iid, An~'r.eim, Cai,fornia, Owr.e=s; C. F„ MUELLER, 9?26 Kiinaerman, Soa:h E1 Monte, C,i?fo:nia, A~ent cr ce°tair. re~l property situated in tne City of Anaheim, County of Oiange9 State of Ca:ifcrnia, described in E;;hibit "A" attached `~ereto and referred to he:ein as though se~ fort!~ in :ull ; end WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public heering nt the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on ~epteTber .:b, 19o6,at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required by law and in eccordance withthe provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chaptec 18.68, to hear end consider evidence for and ageinst seid proposed varience and to investigate end make findings end recommendetions in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself end in its beha(f, and nfter due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered ~t seid hearing, does find ond detertnine the folfowing Eacts: 1. Thait the patitioner requests e variance (rom the Aneheim ~tunicipal Code: '-~ p~:;;,it ti.P N: ~r ~1or o: ~ `-ee star.d:ng sign on subject oroperty. SEC'tIO~d :F~~o?.G90(B-?i - Height o, ~ {I'PP'SLandin:~ ~:i~~n (2: ioot ..a.:irr,um !.eior.t pe:mitteo ivitilin 300 .'eet cf a st:u~ture used e;;clus:ve;~~ for :asidenti~l puz~ocees; `.6 ioot ';ig'~~ siqn propose~.) ~ECTIOId ~R 6~ 09U(B-~~ Area of freP-st~ndina siar.s (~~~0 ;qu,re : eet ~,Ar r„c~~ oermitted -•~i~ sau~;:e feet n: s:yr, ;:Po p;-cp^,pn.) ~_. That ;h;f~ p:cposed :eq;iest ~tiou:d estabiist, an ur,,ir•s:r,3u:e ure.:edent tor e•:c.es~~ive:y .a:;e sign reyuests f~or cther :omme:°cia: uses ne~r ti;e f:ee•,~7y~s, ~„ Tt;a[ the prcpose:: .:qn ~~ould i.ave ~ de:eterious ._:fe,; o;~, t!:e :esioenti~i ir.,ecrit}~ cr ti;A area to !,he zast and aost o' subjact proE;prty. =~. That the e~bct;on of the A1::;~i1 ;ir,n a~ tf,e sou;i.e,~s' rornN: vE e,,,t Stre~-~ ;r,,i R~irin~:y~ Drive ,va~ ar.~omp:mi?d by st.rcnc; protests lrom res:~ier~:s :n !.is aie~ and ., ., ~,r;,~;;;S;,F; u:im~ to tne adeption cf tne Sign O:d~nance. 5o That tne existinq Si9n Ordinance p:~ovides foi ;,dE~qun;~ sir:r.inn ci • e ~,:oposea u~:e ot ::ubjuct prcperty. ~'' 6. That tt;e: e aro ~1C pXCPDL10fle: cr e.:! raordir~ ~: y:.1: :~r~st~r:cr~s or ~ ondi ~;ons app: i-an!~ r ~~'-r? P=aperty i;~;ro:ved c: to ti~e in~ende~ use of t.t,~ ~:~r, P:• 1 F _y _.._, do ~~ot ~,~~~1~1 necNr~li~~~ tc t;~e property or ~•iass of us? in tne same vicir.ity ~r.,: ur.~=. . Tt..,!. no :,r.e ~ppeared in cpc,ositior~ t.o subjec: pet;::,,.. V 1-D -1- ~ i ~ .~::~.~, ,! ~ ~ ~ i` I .; i i ; .~ i ' :I . ;'~ fl ~ i - * ' :I ~ , ,~ ~ I;: ~ [[[i ,~ ~~ . n . '_ " -, -L `~. ... __ .... ~~ .y;, • S :~T i ~!i ~' ~~ NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RECOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Veriance on the basis of the aforementioned findings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 6th day of October~ 1906. ~ ~ ~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNfNG COMMISSION ATTEST: •C. L l! 1~/~~~~i SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OP' ANAHEIM ) I, AnA Secrete of the Cit Plennin Commission of the Cit of Anaheim, do hereb certi '~~~ ry Y g Y Y fY thet the fore- going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on SeptembeT 26~ :966, at 2:00 o'clock p,M,~ by the foilowing vote of the members thereof: AYE5: COMMISSIONERS: Aiiredi Fara~~o, Gauer, Herbst, MungaiiY Rorriand9 Comp~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6tfi day of October, 196b. ~%L-~C.~ ~~_ G. , SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91 V2-D -2- ~