Loading...
PC 67-138RESOLUTION NO. PC67-138 A RESOLUTION nF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETTTION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. ~1BE DENIED WHEREAS, th= t:ity Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit from KF.NiJETH W. AND HELEN L. HOLT, 1557 West Mable Street, An~ :eim, California 92802 Owners of certaan real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full ~ ..a~"s,~ ,; f : ',. I ' i ; and '~ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing ai the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on June 19, 196 i, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid publ~c he•ring heving been duly given as required by I law end in eccotdence with the pravisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear end consider evidence for and against said praposed conditiaaal use and to investigate and meke findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and ` i WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigstion, end study mede by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered et said hearing, does find end determine the following feds: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for which e Conditional Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to wit: 5ection 18.54.020(1-`), to oermit the expansion of a private educational facility ~vith waiver of: SECTION 18.52.Oo0(2-f) - Yards and setbacks. (No fences permitted in the required setback area; a 6-foot fence in the front setback oroeo=_ed) 2. That the size of the site proposed for the use is inadequate to allow ,`or proper ' develooment of the propo=_ed expansion, since only approximately 200 square feet per child ,~ ~.vo~ld be provided for both play and school area based on an enrollment of 100 students. j - 3. That the prooosed expansion will create traf`ic congestion in the area, since no - droooff area is provided on the site. , 4. That the proposed redwood fence to separate the olav area :rom the streat will , create "blind spots" for vehicular and peoestrian troffic, as well as create a hazard for automobiles backing out of the residences to the south. 5. That three oerson= appearEd, one of whom oresented a petition sioned by 15 persons ~'' and two letters were received in opposition to subject petition. ~' ~i f~ ; i ~ ~ I ~ ~ I. t 1 - i i I ~ Cl-D -1- :' ~ - I '~ i r r ~ ` ' ~ r F •--~'~ ~ ',' # ':~i ;,r ,~~ ~ ~~ _! :, -=° a _ , ~. . , By..~..: ~ ~~ ~ ~ ;r ~ .. ~ - ~.~' ~ . ^ ~ ` . ........:.L::........~...'........... `:~...` ~~~' Dated cs oi 7:30 A.N., on ~~iay Lk ~ 1907 • t~n H. Kothe Ves;ee: i icr,Ni~'31n t:. 'r'OiT and 'H~LEN L. HOLT, nusband and wiie 1 as I , joint tenants. - ~YY , ;~.; i ~u? . - ~,:. T. . ..:"C.1,_~ -'•I •.•e ic^d reie ~ed to in ,'r.is repor. t is ia tne s;a;e of r •^•' •~~ ! Ccl::ornic, coun;y o, Orar.ge , ,;.~ .; ;~ ~=112i. ~O~ L? Ori O: LOt V 4 ~_._~ ~ ~_.--- -__._.__..._ _ ', 7~ 171 ~1'~E.' C.`~V Oi P.n2he~m, aS SnOI:'Tl 0:1 2^1c1~.%Oi,J ~~v 51.:~ VEy ~ai:C: D;J t~f].1112T: i3~~~:21 ?.iQ fllG'C 1:1 i.:1@ Oii1CE OI' t '03.~., recordeci o~ ~os Anoeles Cow~t~ C~1 he county ~' ;~ da~K J, liO:l:ig~ a copy oi :•rnicn is sho~•rn 3, ~a~es io3 zr:c ~ollo~•rino, en;,i;,lec "Los ;n,meles County i~iaps" ~~ *ollorrs-c~ ~I yr~ ~~~'"y ~'~corder oi said Oranne County, descrited %Ej-!'?=a'i2':~ c1L t.:e Sou~heaste^_y CO:Z7C'T' Oi SalCl i~U~ ~'j~ S.a.1Q UO~rii, Of , b2r~'lririlri~; IJZ:iri~; OI^i i,:;2 CC :`vG~ 1~17~ 02' „y1riUt Street; tnence :iortherly _ ~ 1~'L' ~'+ 'e@~ u~ :"; S21Q Cc:1L2T' Zl:le Oi '.~21riUt Stree~. bein ::8':;;2rly line 02 Sc1C1 LOi, ={'j~ i..^.cI1C@ „°S~ t,~ % a1.50 i.t7@ ~``~•`+'* -~t~~ i:OT'@ OZ' ~ 1G0,00 ~eet; thence SOU~17 lass, to t'.e Sou~herl,y line of ~'r.:e land described i:1 tne deed _^or.: r. C Krause a7d :•rii a, -; r C12.i.~C1 Decer;ber IU 1 1 ~~ =' a. Lin ~cSIRUSS@71 gri(~ 411i G~ , 9 9 and recorded ir. booic ;50, page 150, Deeds; tnence ~asterly 1~0.00 feet alon~ tne aoutherly line o~ said Rasmussen , 12nc to t~e point oZ beginnino. ; . (c.ontinued) ~ ~ Pd16-:.•fi (Hcv. &63) - ~ ' . - i ~,.....~,. . ,_ . .. - . ~ , . t . . . f 1 ~~\ ~~: _ r~ 323~30-:.;:. ; p~~e ~ ` ~ ~G I :~~C~~1 i..^.@ :~;.G'r'! j' 3U.Gu :CCL i.t1L.:'c..: ~ bE1:1~ 311 ~L72~ DOPt1017 lying :'ii~f11'.1 i.;i~ 11i?2S Of j•;21:1i,;i. :~i,T'cLi:. S.31G ZGi1C1 i~ i:1ClUG~eCl ',d1i.Riri ~P? 22'::c`: S:IOI?ri Ori 8;!18D I'11ed in b00;{ ~1~ .-.~.~.., ~ln ~•~~~...~1 ~~~ n • _t~~~_~~ _~~ ~_• ~ n~_"~L •• a~~~~rder .-s.>,.._~,,~:_,.~~.,,,<..>.. _:s.~,...z _ _.,~..~-.~,.._._. ,.~ ...~-~ - _ , _ . -.,~:. _.., ,.. ,.:..-. ._ .,., .: ....___ ...-..,_...,..... ---- ._. ' ` ' . . -~ ~+~: --2y e~ J ~ ,i ~~~ 1~ ~ ' ~ ~;' . NOW, THEREFORE, PE IT RESOL,VED thet the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use i~ermit on the besis of the aforementioned findings. TFiE FOREGO:NG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me.this 29th day o` June~ 196~. / v ~~i G~HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN ING COM SSION ATTEST: ,/, ~:f "1..; ~jl, /: SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore- going resolution wes passed and adopted at a meeting o[ the City Planning Commission ofthe City of pneheim, held on Jun e 19 ~ 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, Munqall, Rowland, Camp. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Nor.e. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 29th day of June, 1967. C~ ~~~ c. %7~ c ~~-< SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Nn. 13$ C2-D _2_ ~:? ~ ~ `A i ,~tY ~ O