PC 67-141~
RESOLUTION NO
oce;..la~
" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT~' OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 60 -67-•73 gE DENIED
~ , -~-~jt
'{ ~
i
~~
~}~
*
~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified petition for Reclassifica-
tionfrom JOHN A~ AND BESSIE L~ EAKIN, 2100 South Euclid Street9 Anaheim, California 92802,
O~Nr.ers; l'lILLIAM KRUK'iERy 144$2 Beach Boulevard, Suite W., VJestminster, Califo^nia 92683, Agent
of c=rtain real oroperty situated in tne City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State oi California,
described as the West one•half of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 2~3,
Township 4 South, Range :0 West, in the Rancho Las Eolsas, as shown cn a Map recordeo in Book
F1y Page 10 0!~ Niscellaneous Mapss :ecords of Orange County. E4cept thA:e+rom the South .0
acres thereof_ Also excepting the Northerly 195,00 feet of the West 20~. W feet thereo?.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of pnaheim on
,Tur.F 159 19679 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim hlunicipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider evi-
dence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in
connection therewith: and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a redassification of the above described pcoperty from the R q, Aq: icui±ura:,
Zone to the R 3.; Muitiple Family Residential; Zone to _<scabii=_h o mu:tic:e ~amily __=_ider.tiai
subdivision on subject oroperty.
2~ Tnat Gen=sa~ Plan Amendmer.t I`o. 95 •~;as _onside: F: pr:or to ac~ in conjunc~ion ~Nitn
~ the p:oposed reclassification.
_ 5. Th~t no land use ~hance has t3ker olace to narran± consi~eratior. o: mu:t:niF ~amily
residential deveiopment of subj~ct oroperty and that saio 1~veioorn=nt .tiould bP ~etr:menta:
to the single i'amiiy re~i:ential intecrity o; the area ,roni~h njs oe•n PSL3L:i15IlE~
4, Tha~ th2 oroaosed rec;a=_sificatior. nou:o -=tab~isn a p:ece:.~t io. adioimr.q vacar?
i R•P. parcels, thereby e.iminatiny any po==_ible sin~•,= f am?:y suodivis.on o: inese par~~eis,
a=_ nas been estab:ished i;o the nortn, south, e~=t, and :~es~, acd as ~e~::ted on the General
Plan.,
5. That =_ubject oroperty ;s oevelooaoie ior s~nyl? =ami:y s~~~~~.~•:sior. dAvelo~m=r.t.
6. ?'nat ro~.r cersons appea-ed reoresenting a n~mber o: ce=sons present ir. th~ Councii
Chamber ir. oooosition; that a lette: 'rom the Clty o~ Ga:den Grove was re=eived ir. onpo=.ition,
and that a petition siar?d by 20 per=_ons was :ece:ve~ 'in ~a~~o: o' sub;ect eetition
R 1-D -1-
_ ._ _
.. . ~ -
-• ~
5
r.
ii
~ ~
~~ i
~I
i
f.i
~
~~I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
~, ~ to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassification be denied on the basis of the
' `I aforementioned findings.
k~
i'
k,~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this ~°tn ~ay o.` .iune, 196'.
.
~. j' ~
,.I c
; I CHAIRMAN ANAHEIrt CITY PLAN ING COMM SION
~ ATTEST:
~ f - ,~, ~_ ,
i C.- ~ 1-/ : C- ' ~~u_ ~c~ .
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
FI
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
, ; COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
i ~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
:; I 9 Ann Kr ebs y Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
_'r going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
~ June 199 19679 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
~ ~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Rerbst, Mungail; Rowland, Camo.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~~one.
~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Farano~
I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 29th ~ay of June9 i9b7.
~;
! ~
i '
i; ~ ~ ~
~. • i _~~C~ L., z. ;~rr.~. L~ i
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMA1ISSION
~ ..
~' RESOLUTION NO. 141
i
~-~ , R2-D -2_
w,f ~
r.!
~ ~
~
`~ ~x~
_• _ __.. .. , __ _. _ . ..~.. _ . - "-"'.~~ ~.._ - . . .
._:.. .._.. . . .
__ -"' .. ~~ , - - -- !~~
~