Loading...
PC 67-15RESOLUTION NO. PC67-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-46 BE GRANT,ED E. rt^•''d~~ 1~ ~ .~~ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Ana ;eim did initiate a verified Petition for Reclassification on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described in £xhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in ful: ; and ~!i ~ ~tx WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of pnaheim on January 16 ~ 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P.M11., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions oE the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evi- dence for and egainst said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith: and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. Thatthe Planning Commission proposes a reclassification of the above described proper~y known as the Rinker Ar.nexation ~o. 2, from the R-A, Agricultural, Zone (interim) to the R-2 5000, One Family Residential, Zone. 2. That the proposed reclassification is in conformance with the General Pian as amended by General Plan Amendmeni: No. R7. 3. That the propo<_ed reclas=_ification o: subject. ~roperty is necessary andjor riesirable for the orderly and proper development of the community. 4. That the proposed reclassi,`ication of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses local:y established in close proximity to =ubject property ~nd to the zones ond their permitted uses generally established throughout the .;ommunity. 5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property reGuires the dedication and improvement oz abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, due to ~.:• anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the itensification o: land use. 6. Thzt no one aopeared in opposition to subject petition. R1-A _l. ~ ~ , ;'.~ ~, ~ ~~ _. J J :~1~:\L'.2 ia.~` ;.tii~a11V~ .~(~i. ~ T:Fl~ JOYL10 : Oi 18 :c: Z.OCdLdC lri ~:~, (;0~: ;~ f• Gi v~d:1Cv~ Stc3~C~ O~ Cul.i.°.Gr:1~c7~ G¢:SCTl~P_C7 aS ~OliOWS: ~egir.: _ :g at a _~oi..- _:. .:e e.:•:is~ing C_~•~ - i . '_ , ^ ~'. _ :._ ;:it ~a2 0~ tne City o~~....~i:e•.~7, as ~:s;.a:,.~~s:eci bv `.::~ tll:l~t.r i~:1:P.:iuLiO: LO L.:t= CiLV Oi n:d1~.i:,~~+ 7uSSc:G DV ~:"G17'id:,C~; :~0. 22~7 ~:iF:YC : o~ i96G ~ `; ied a: th ~r.e Secre~ur~~ o~ St ;.a .;~ri'_ 11 19Gu, ar.c ~ecorc~c rpril 1~ ?~' ~ ~ ~-- ' _, ~uu, :~ ::~ o~:.ic~ G= ~f1@ COll :L.V R~CO~Ci~~ G~ O«:C131 :wCOYGS O~ G~- :~~: COL':itv, C~~l~OY..~F:, SIi1G ~.Gl..L O.'. ~aginning 've:~ng t :e SoL~r.eas.. ccr:~er c~ ?a~cei ~O, ?~ OL i..^.~. ],u.^.~:: CG: VQV~C LO u.2 i~ F:Cc :~.1$ ~ 10G SC:1001 D15'CY~C ~ O~ G~ F: ;C~ ~p;: ;~~/ ~ CEl~.~Oirilc., JY ?1:~u~i GYC:t.~ O~ CG;.GO:'~ dL1,p:., =ecorced ~,~rii 18, 19G3 in ooo;c o51•:, 5ac,es io3 a::fl 18: o~ O~~~ci41 i2ecoras o~ 0~4:.c,e Coun~y, Cali~ornia; the;.ce 1. ' ~eaving -:e sGi;z ex~sti::g Ci~y ;,i:ti _.~nes o~ -:e C=L.V O~ i:lu :0_il~ 810: Cy d~OT :_O : O~ ~:~: SOllLl: `~ ` ~~1! 1~ :e o~ Pa~cel Une c~ t'r.e _wr,c co :veyec to saic . 21ac~n~ia Uni~iec Sc:ooi Distric- .., SOL'LR :b'~i° .7.7' 39° Lc.S~ .74~ .Oa .~@e:~J u.t:AC~ 2. So~~:~ 5° 3~: ~ 2:. tti,>s ~ i70 .01 = = ~ ' ~ ;e ~~ ~ee,., ~ eav~.: r, ~ $Oll~:1C'~~ V 1~1: C: OL ~.:2 ~~ :Q CG:1V2.V~.G ~O :C 58iC~ ?.:.GCI:i.~.i4 V: Z:.r.~:Q .~JC..l7~~ L~~$~~.~Cl. i.~ 4i1`.....- - ~L~ sec~io: ~,~i~.. ~::a e::is~_ac,. C:-„ -'_:~i- --.. " ~. r ~ : ~ ' ~e o~ :.: C1 ~.V Oi tri:.d :EL;i ~ c.5 2S ~.da11S:.2GJ i~ L:~., ui.OY'P.- i1G' :-~O: t:C i21 ::iC.'.~ :i:l :0:ic:~Gi.~ S~iG ~0:. :~. O~ 1AL2Z'- sec~io: ~,eir.g _. t~e ::os;. Easte~ ~~ 1..:.e o~ saic :2'_:i'•C0Y ,ii.:7t_.:idL10:: ~ C~.`,Lu :L ~O~ ~A~12°• ~ i~ QU n S'~~:ST. i~I.?7 LuvT. ~YG:l L:.2. SG::L :2d5~ COY:~2Z' O~. saic Ri..;ter aane:;atior.; ,..:e: ce .~i, aOZ'LA 12° ZJ ~ OO° :;CSL l~J i',D7 ~~:0~ u1.0 i~ c .^.O~T..'~Oi. Oi ~.:C ~.c.5~. n:en~io:2C.-.'v;i1ST.illc'j ~.'l~.v T+1~ii. ~1:1C~ Gi ~1:~ C1~~/ Oi r'~'7d1'i~?l~~ ~O ~1Z~ `~JOiIl~ o~ begir.r.ing, ~~ ~` ~ ~~ ~* ~ 1 ,. ' . ' ; ^ ~^ r~r•^. V v ~v f ~~(~ ~ ~- .. d ' ._ .. ~ ~ • _ _ _ _ . • . , i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED th~t the Anaheim City Pl~nning Commission does hereby recommend to the City CouncIl of the City of Anaheim th~t aubject Petition for Reclaesi~eation be approved and, by so doing, tl~at TiUe 18-Zc;aing of the Aneheim Municipel Code be amended to e:clude the ~bove descrIbed property from the R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the R-2 5000, One Family, Zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary pre- requisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Drange County Recorder. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 525.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, scid amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. r ~ E t a , r.~ :I ~ ~'~ ,~x I~ 'i ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ - -- THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed ~nd ~pproved by me thia 26th day of January, 1967. /~ ' -=GL~i~ ~ ~ =~~ L " CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: l l = ~ `~ ,~~~ . SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY CF ORANG£ ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs ~ Secretary oE the City Planning Cammission of the City of M~heim, do her~by certiEy thrt the fore- going resolution wes pessed and adopted at a meetine of the City Planning Commiasion oEthe City of Aneheim, held on January 16, 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camo. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Non e. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my h~nd thie 26th day of January~ 1967. RESOLUTION NO. 15 R2-A ~l >: ~ Z .7 L "~ /~i L ~,. SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COAtMISSION -2- ~ ~