Loading...
PC 67-193RESOLUTION NO PC67•-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0.67°~8••~5 BE APPROVED WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissian of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica- tionfrom EMMA N~. PEiLEW, 2500 E. South StrEet, Anaheim, California 92806, Owner; ROB~RT DE RUFr', T~~ P„ 0„ Box 1133y idewport Beach, Caliiorniay Agent of certain real property situated in the City r.i of Anaheim9 County of Orange, State of California, describec in Er.hibit "A" attached hereto ~~~ , and rePer.red to herein as though set forth in full f. ~ . and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissi~n did hold a public hesring et the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on August 28, 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required by law end in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to heer end consider evidence for end against said proposed reclessification and to investigate and make findings end recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered et said hearing, does find and determine the following fects: 1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the ebove described property from the R-A~ AGRICULTURAL ZONE to the R-1, ONE FAMi?.Y RESIDENTIAL, ZONE to establish a 39-lot subdivision cn sUbject pxopertyo 2., Tt~at the proposed reclassification is in conforma~ce with the General Plana 3. That the proposed reclessificetion of subject property is necessery and/or desireble fo: the orderly end pro- per developrnent of the community. 4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their pertnitted uses locelly esteblished in close proximity to subject property and to the zones end their permitted uses generelly esteb- lished throughout the community. 5a That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require the dedica- tion and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated Uy the :.ntensification of land usee 6o That no one appeared in oppo~ition to subject petition. ~ : ~~ ~ R-A ' 1' , }. ~-- ~ •-- ~a.~_. { ~ :~ ~ ` - , i. ~ i ~ RtCLASS. iVO. ~ ~~~'S /S , ~ ~~ i ,~ ~~ 1 ' ~ - 1'our No. - , ' ^ ~ o~~ o~d~~ rvo. o~_a~sosi-xL i The following is a report of the title to the land described in your appl~wtion for a Policy of Title Insurance and is madc I without liability and without ~bligation to issue such policy. In addition to any exteptions shown nerein, and not cleared, ; sne policy, if issued, will contain co~ditio~s and stipulations and also exceptions from its coverage as may be embodied ~ by the particul~r form of policy issued. ~ Dated as of July 26~ 1967 at 7:3Q a.m. 1 ~,~° o~~,,,~., l~. ~~- . ~ Ylilliam H, BT'Lll1S TITIE OFFICER ~ ~ VESTEE: afi~fA ALLEi1 P~LLE:W~ a widow, I SUBJ~CT TO; ' ~ ~ f l r,._-- - ; ~i~.-u i;;0;i1-:1L 1 ~ ."1 tt:.i~ ccrl. in lc:,d c:ituai:ed ~~; t:ic Stytc oi CrLli~o:r..:a, Cour;ty oF Oru;~e~ ' Cit. of ln~ri~ci±n i Y , describeu as ~ollo:r~: ~ Tne i:orLii~:e~t , ~ quarter of tlle nori;htre~t qu;~~;,er o~ tile nortlieast au~rter oi I Sect;ion 13, To-anship 4 South, R,~.n,ge 10 j~lest, in tiic P,ancho ~an Juan Ca~on de ~ Snnts Ans, County of Oran~e, State of Calixornia, as per m~~p reco:ded in book 51, pcige 10 of Miscellaneous ;Saps in ti~e office o,: tne county recorder of said county, i.xcept i;hat portion thereof lying northerly ox the iollowin~ de~cribed li:ie: Be~,inning at a point on the westerly line of said i:o: tii;aest quwrter oi ti~e northwest quarter, South 0° 56' 58" Flest 68.6o ieet irom ',-,l:e nort:iwesi; corner thereof; thence South 89° O1' 02° iast 57.00 iee~.; ;;nence i~iorth 3g° Cgc .~g" ~ast 36.58 feet to a line parallel witn and sot~tnerly ~0.00 feet ~rom the northerly line of said section; thence South 89° 00° 14" iasi; 27v,00 xeet along 45'd?0'~~ast1227n02 feetetosthehea8terly line oi~sa~id northwesttquarter~ofhtheo nori;:iwest quarter. *~~- 4i'IID: cgt - ~ ~ - J NOW, THEREFORE, BL• iT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Aneheim that subject Petition for Recleasification be approved end, by so doi:.~, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipel Code b;* amended to exclude the ebove described property from the R-•A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the R-1, One-Family Residential, Zone, upon the following condition~ which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to oreserve the sa:ety and geieral welfare of the r,itizens of the City of Anaheim. 1, That a final Tract 1Aap of surj2ct property be approved by the City Council and re- coxded in the office of ~}~e Orange County Reccrder. _ TNE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is si~ned end epproved by me this ?th day of September9 1967. ~' G vC-~=" ' c' / /~ AIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION , ATTEST: / ~ i_ ~ ( ~:1.,.~ . -.~~2:/j~;~:~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM j I~ Ann Kr ebs, Secretary uf the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore- going resolution was passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthc City of Anaheim, held on P.ugust '?8, 1°67~ at 2:00 o'clock P.iV1., by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 3pUER, HERBST, MUNGALL, ROVJLqP:D, CA~,1?. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. y~'l ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 28th day of September~ 1967. E~ ,_ r / ~_'~~ ~/ r , 1.~.. ~ ~~~..[%~~, ;. i ~ . * SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANIdING COMMISSION ;. ~ ,~x RESOLUTION NO. 193 R2-A -Z- ~ ~