Loading...
PC 67-206PC67-•206 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1904 BE GRANTED ~ ,_. ~ks,-~ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a veriEied Petition for Veriance from NORBERT T, r' ,'?~RA ANf~: c"TNERS AND MARGARET C„ SHINN, 628 West Valley View Drives Fullerton; California 92b32, ~wners; MESA LAND ~MPANY, 128 East Katella, Orange, California 926579 P,aent o:' certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County ef Orange, State of Cali;ornias described as Parcel No~ 1: The east one-half of the nortn onrhalf of the south one~h~:lf' of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 4 South, Range 11 Wests being in the Rancho Los Coyotes9 as shown on a map thereof recorded in boo': 51, page 7, et seoo, hliscellaneous maps, recoros of said Orange County ; and WNEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on S ept emb er 13 ~ 1967, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public heering heving been duly given as required by law and in eccordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence Eor end egainst seid proposed variance end to investigate and make findings end recommendations in connec- tion therewith; and WtiEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself and in its behalf, and aEter due consIderation of all evidence end reports offered 'at seid hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. Thet the petitfoner reauests a variance from the Anaheim Municipel Code: to permit develooment of =_ub; ec t brooerty with a 117-unit one and two-story apartment complex. SEGTION 1h.28.050(5-b) -• A~aximum building neight (1_stor,~ permitted wi~nin ?~0 .°eat o: zn R-•A, Zone (residential); 2-storv proposeo) 2. Thet there are exceptional or extreordinery circumstences or conditions eppliceble to the property involved or to the intended use of the property thet do not epply generelly to the property or class of use in the seme vicinity and zone. 3. That the requested varience is necessary for the preservation end enjoyment of a substential property right possessed by other property in the seme vicinity end zone, end denied to the propeRy in question. 4. That the requested va:iance will not be materielly detrimental to the public welfere or injurious to the pmp~ erty or improvements in such vicinitv and zone in which the property is loceted. ~~ That one letter was receiv=d in ooposition to the orioinzl location of tne re:~eation area a:~dacent to the R-1 homes. Vl-G _i_ ~x NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Mnheim City PlaminQ Commission does hereby grent subject Petition for Varience, upon the following conditiona which ~n hereby found ta be e neccasary prerequisite to the pm- posed use of the aubject property in order to preserve the ufety aad `merel welfare of the Citizena of the City oE Maheim: lo That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 67-68-10. ?. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on iile with t:ie office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shie3ded from view. 5. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1, Revision No. 1, Exhibit Noso 2, 3, 4, and 5. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION lr ~i~ed ~ad ~ppto~~d by ee W~ st day of September, 1967. ~ ~ / / = ~ %C LGC,' " : G .~ . ~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C MISSION ATTEST: ~,~ _ ,f"t~.l~. SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) es. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I~ Ann Kr ebs ~ Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was pessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on September 139 1967~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Faranoy Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Camo. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: P.llred. ABSTAIN: OJMMISSIONERSs Rowland. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 21st day of September, 1967. ~~'t RESOLUTION NO. 206 L ~% ~ ; ~ ~ ~Z; r.,_ . , SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION _ * ~ VZ_G _2_ ~ % . c