Loading...
PC 67-241RESOLUTION .o ~6~-241 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMlIISSION OF TH£ CITY OF ANAHEAI THAT PETITION FOR CONDITiONAL USE PERMIT 973 BE DENIED WHER£AS, the City Plaming Commiesion of the City of Maheim did receive a veri[led Petitloe for Con- ditional Use Pe~mit feoo NURIHI. LED]Z, 2201 Wagner Avenue, Anaheim, California 92 06, Owner; NORMAN SMFDEGAARD, ~,11 North Broadway, Santa Ana, Califor~ia 92701, Agent oi certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orznge, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein zs though set forth in full ~ i ~ ~~ ; end ~FiEREAS, the City Plannin` Commis~ion did hold ~ public heorin` at the City Hall in the City of M~heim oa October 23 y 1967, ~t 2:00 o'clock P.l1., notlce of ~nid public he~dn` hovin~ bNn duly ~ivw y nqaired by l~w wd in ~ccord~nce with the pro~~~ions of the M~heim Municipnl code, C6~pter 1s.6~, to henr ad conaider evid~nce for ~ad apin~t aud propos~d condltIon~1 use ond to investipte ~nd m~lc~ Eindin~s and ncommrndation~ in connaction therewith; and WHEREAS, ^dd Commiuioa, after due lnspection, investlgatian, end Qtudy made by itxlf md in ita be- h~l[, ~md dtec ~s aoosidentlee oI dl wid~c~ ~nd repoets of(eead at saId hearia~, does find ~nd detHmiae the followia` taetr. 1. 'I1~t t6e propoNd ase is pap~dy oes tor which ~ C.c~ditim~! Use Pe~it is ~uthor~ed by thl~ Coda, Se~.tion 18.64~020(2-d), to ~,vit: establish an adult only mobile home par'r. on sub;ect property~ 2., That the use proposed is incompatibie with the established single family land uses to the north, ,vest, and southeast af sub.ject property, where single `amily residentia. deaelopment has occurred. 3. That the G2neral Plan indicates that this general area should be developed for low density residential !and use of not more than six dwelling units per net residential acre, whereas the prooosed development pro?ects 10.9 units per net arre. 4. That studies made by other citie= indicate that the demand .^"or community services generated by mobile homes i=_ conparable to that created by rnultipie family deveiopment, and that traffic generated by the pr~~posed use would be ei~nilar to multiole famiiy dev2loo- ment or a much heavie: tra`:ic volume that wou].d be generated by low density residential develooment. 5. That although the petitioner stated that the prooosed mobile home par}: wouid be .`or adu:ts ~nly and that thi= would be insureo throuon private deed restrictions, such deed restrict.ions are not en`orce3ble by the City and there would be no poGitive as=uran:e that :~:~iilies with children would not eventually occupy the mobile home oark, which could create an unoredicted increased burden upon school and oarE: faciliti.es in thz area. 6. That since this part of Anaheim has been designated for low density residential uses, many people have purchased homes in the arez upon the belief that it vaould remain a single family area; and that these residents property rights should be protected with the assurance that the character of the area will not be cnanged by the injection o." more intense :and use=, a protection that is similar to that which is presently en;oyed in the industriai and commercial-recreation areas. 7. That a petition signed by 503 persons for a previous conditional use p2rmit for a mobile home park on subject property was submitted; however, the Commission, by motion did not admit this as evidence of opposition. n, That 4 persons app2ared representing 15 parsons present in the Council Chamber in opposition; ?.`»' • i ~tter<_ .:erz re ~ i: e: in opposition >.nc: rnat 1 etters ~i•a~~ ;`, proc-,erty o.~:r~ei•~ .,, ..:~or o,' sub,je~_t petition ~^:er= also recei~deo. CFD _~_ ~E •,.i!1;~. .. G:=i~ ' Dated as oi ;,pl•il 11 y 1~67, ~ . .. ~j ' ;,v....~ti_ ,•~.: ~~~~ ; ~ f v ` TIIIE OFFICER ~ ' ~'~].~.Z~F.:; i:. TiT11:3^. at 7:30 a.m. ~j~~ ~',~r~'i ~ / VESTEE: ~~•nT-•- r 7~%:~~? f ` ' \ r/ I,..,,.,, ... , or_~erly suri.cl ii. ~nr,ner, ns her sole nnd sepnrute propcrty, ~>,::^ r.a :.o rn t:nd:;vided 1/lOth ir,tc~rest in r~~d Lo Parccl 2; ',,/ ~ i,~;,~ C. :}. Ttn:;F•~':SC~':, a Tsnrried ~;iu~, nn Co on undivided 1/4 int•erest in and to . Pnrccl 2, ra;3 ~ :'i~o ticir~ or ftvisces o: '.Jillinn t:e,r,ners Jr., ncccased, sub,lcc~ to thc sc'..~!`.:~?atro~t~on os ~'ie estate of cnid decec'.ent; 1?urial ??. Trnz beinr the r,;::~; r.~~pcin~ed rn<i qunli:'ici: exccutrix. Cr.ac !io. !,-5~+h75, :~unerior Court o° ~i~.o St+ L•c aP c:nli ; nrnin, in cinn i or t:~e Co~uity of C~ran~e ~ nn to an ur:.:ividc~i 1/~+ intelz:~:t in r,r.d :o Fnrccl 2~ nnd nll of 3'nrcel 3; .=.nd „_.:;:T. L. l~'~!~:::ii~ a vidr,~:, ns to an un.livi,ied 1/2 intereat nnd thc Neirs ~r :`evisccs of ~+':1].ic~n '.!r.;~ner. Jr., 2eceaaed, euL,~ect to the ad~inistrr.tion o:' ti~c r.stnte o: said rxceuent; ~'urSel .T?. Lenz bein~ the duly arpointed and qu:lifien cr.ecut•rix. Cuse :;o. r-5~+~+75, 9n~~crior Couxt of t~e :tnte of Ceil.ifornic, ir. Fnd fur tne Caun~y of O:i:nr_,e, ns La rm undivided 1/2 interc~t, in an3 to I'arcel 1~ and the re~auiader of Parcel 2a ~ ........:,~ _~.,_-/~- . ( All thr.t ccrti~in lnad situat•ed in the St•ote of Cnlifornia, County of Jr~wge, ~- ~ City o; ~;r~ahein, described aE follovs: ~ ! ,~°arccl 1: Thc ?rut one-hn11' of the Southxest quarter of the T~orthWest Runrter oP E l Section 13, Totima}:ip k South, i2nnFC 10 k'e.t, in the Rancho Snn Juan Ca,~on de,~~anta i Anu, as atiovn cn n;(np recorded in ~loo`r, 51. page 10 of Ftiscellaneous f~apa~ ~' ecor~o~,~ i of Or~nre Cow~'t~•, Ccliiornin. ~: C~i L ,, ~ EXC::?TIfiG i:herefro:a that portion deccribed ns follous; ~. S~G,~``,% ~;'~ Page 2 c, RE ° ~, `' : % I~ • ^ ^ .. ^ Contiinued ~"~ Z~v ~~~ 'i~ o ., " ~ . ....~- .~.-.._.~~. . ~Ifw...._..__.._.__.,.~~c~6~o~.r,.~G1~i~l....... J Co~srencinr, ot: ttir_ ;iorCheast cor~ier of the SeuL1~We,t qu~.rter of the 3iorthvest qur.r~:c: r:' ae.i.d :.~•:•tina; thr.nee !'es~ SO Tcei:; thenee South ~t5 feet; thence Enst 90 icet; t: r.nec :.o; ~h ~~i fce~ Lo the point of bc;;innin;. ~' , jy ; crccl P: Thnt l~ortio:i of the t:~;t ore-hr.1f or ~:y,~ :;outh:re~t nuo.rL•cr of the ~,I i ~ ~orL;,::~r,b c,u;a•te~ o; Section 13, Te~+nsi~ip h,^.out'n. T~nnv;e 10 West~ in the Rnnch~ Snn Jt:nn Ca,~on de ^c:n1:n Ar.tt~ :,c shoun on a"np rec~rc.ec3 in !3ro}~ jl~ pnF,e 10 of ~~ i•!i:sccilr:;~cous 7`.:.n::, records of Or+~n,.;c Coimt,y, Cnliforiiin, more pnrticulurly, decc:ibe~i 1s :oilou~: ,. i '•~; Cc:r~re~:cin~; nt the 7+orther~a~ corner of Lha ~outhNest qur.r'I;er of the Hori:heeat ~j 2ittirtcr of said ^ec'~ic,n; thence l•icr.t 90 iect; thence South 45 feet; thence _ .:;tct 90 fcei:; thence ;iorth lt5 fcet to L•he point of beeinnin~;. ~ T~arccl 3: i'he ;torth~rc,t quarccr of the .^.outhca,t quslrter of thc ttorthxest auarter ~„~ and Li~e '~lest 11 iect o: the :;ortY~er_~i: r,u~rter of the Southenst quorter of thc t:orii:~:~„~ qunrtcr oT Seci:ion 13, Yovrship ~^out:~, Rnr.Fe 10 ~icst, in Lhe Rancho ~ S~~i~ ,7ucui Cn~on dc Sr.n~tt Ana, ,ic shotim on n:`•:c + recorded in llooY. 51~ poge 10 of ?!ir,ccllnr,cous 'ictps, record> of Ornn;;e Covrrty, Californin. ~ -- - --..._ ~-____.__^---- .. ...~_.__.._,_.~... ' eauaaun~ . ~ - : :. _.... . ; - .a . -i .._ . - •.~.xc..~ ,~^!,..rs ~~ ~F THE FOREuOIhG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me thi~' 2nd day oi Dlovember, _ 19n7. , ~ /= . j' ~/~~_ ~[". ~ ~ .- ~. / '. . i CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLA NING COMMISSION ~ i ,F ! ~ ~~- . ~. . ... ,,~ i~, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject Pet.ition for Conditionel Use Permit on the Uasis of the aforementioned findings. ATTEST: SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I~ Ar.n f:r ebs ~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore- going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City oi Anaheim, held on October 23, 1967, . at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the (ollowing vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer. Herbst, Rowland, ~amo. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~`+or e. ABSENT: COM!111SSIONERS: Munaall. IN WITNESS WHEREOc, I have hereunto set my hand this %nu day oi Octooer, l~'67. ~~~ ~! ` ~* ,`:; f ~ i.. RESOLUTION N0. 241 C2-D ~"_ ` ', ~ ~ ! ' SECRETARY ANAHEIA1 '~ITY PLANNING C01111ISSION -z- ,- ,_, _ _ -- ' - - . ; -------°~-- - -- - . - .,;,~r. ~,,;, :.~ - C