PC 67-259kESOLUTION NO. p~~7-259
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. ~~2~ BE GRANTED
e . ~ ~L+~_
:' -
F~1
_ * j
.4Y
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Variance
from ERNESTIN~ N„ GRASSy i780i Norwooj P~rks TuStiny Ca',i:ornia ~26E0; G,~~ne:; E,: J„ ~~:ON4AD9 :7g0;
Nor•~ood Park, Tustin, Caiifornia ~26Q0; Agent of certain reai p:ope:~y situated ir t'~e City o:
Anaf.eim, County o` Orangey State Of C3i12-0r~~ld, descrioed as Lot ^:o~ ~2 of Tj•,,,t :vo~ ;;~~
as shown on a map recorded in book 58 pages 20, 27, and 28 of Miscelianeous A1,p;, R, o:-,; or
Orange County.
; and
NHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on Decemb~r -1~ i967, a[ 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissinn, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself end in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered a~ said hearing, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Cod ~ as i o. i o;, s, • o;:, a; r,^. it t', e
estabiishment oi' an existiny room addition as a con*orming ~se:
SEC?'IO~d iR.,2,,03C(2' _ M~inimum :eo~ired side ~ a^o (5 ! eet rec;u~: P:; _
- -- . • ~-t procos ~d;~ .
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circ~mstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the pcoperty or class of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right
possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will" not be matetially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinitv and zone in which the property is located.
V 1-G
-1-
- . ' ,-T-~------ -+.-~r..
. .. _ , • ~ ~~u^ ~~.<,~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE:~ that the Anaheim City Plenning Comm;ssion does hereby grant subject
Petitiun for Variance, upon the following conditions which ate hereby faund to be a necessary prerequisite to ~he pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the sefety F~nd general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
lo That subject addition s!~all comoly with all buiiding, electricai, and plumbing
requirements of the City of Anaheim, prior to the issuance of a cortif'icate of compiiance.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ls signed wnd approved by me this~t `~ d ay o~ D ec emn er , 1 uo7 ~
' ~~ i
~ ,
~_ ~~ ~~ ~-~~~~
~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/ - .-L' ;;
L%L 7'L- "1 t--",!_~2~.,G~_,.~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I; Ann K: ebs3 Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adoptecl at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the Cit}~ of Anaheim,
held on D ec emb e: 4 y 196', at 2:00 o'dock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Herbst, PLungall, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ^lonea
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A11red, Rowiand.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14t~. day c: December, 1967.
~~~~
RESOLUTION NO. 259
- ~/L ' J"L1 /-IGi ri~i
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANN[NG COMMISSION
i .
~ V2-G _2_
.>{ "~ 8.
y _.
--- _ - _- - - - --- , .
. . - ,~ -- _ +~.~
- . ~ . ~:x.: ~ +~'_.: tr;:
5
F