PC 67-38RESOLUTION NO. PC67-3fl
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHSIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-50 gE pENIED
~ .T~ .
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition (or Reclassifica-
tionfrom HENRY E. AND DOROTHY LESTMANN, 9311 Hillview Road, Anaheim, California 92%~02, Owners;
SHELDON GOLISON, 1505 Beachcomber Drive, Seal Beach, Californiz 90740, Agent of certain re~l
propert~~ situated ir. the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of C~lifornia, described a.=.,
tne North 257 feet of tne East 316.50 feet of the northeast one-quarter o.' tne southeast one-
quarter of the Section 13, Township 4 Sou~h, Range ]1 West in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as per
map recorded ir. book ~1, oage 11 of M11iscellaneous Maps, in the ofiice of tne county recoroe=
o: said Grange Cour.ty
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
February 15~ 1967 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal~ Coder1Ch pter 18b72nto hea g nd considerle v.
dence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in
connection therewith: and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itselC and in its behalf,
and a(ter due consideration oE all evidence and reports offered at sai~ hearing, does find and determine the following
Eacts:
1.Thatthepetitioner requests de]etion of deed restri~tions vlnich lirnit the use of subject
oroperty to medical, oental and professional ofiices, and pnarmacie~ to permit the .'ull
range o: C-1, General Commerciai. Zone uses.
2. That tne scope o: tne prooosed recla=si.°icztion, i.° approveo, does not warrant an
amendment to tne General Plan at the present time, hor;ev~r, it= relations~ip to the Gen_ra'.
Plan symbol will be considered at the next annual review.
3. That the oroposed dele±ion o: deed restrictions on subject property i=_ no~ -;c~es~zr~•
anoior desirable for t!~e orderly ano proper development of ~he communitv.
4, That the prooosed recla=sification of subject prooerty does not orooerly r2late to
the zones and their permitteo uses locally established in close proximity to subiert property
and to the zones and tneir permitted uses generally established throuqhout the communit~-.
~• That land u=es adjacent to and in close proximity to subie;t property incluoe sinole
family subdivision c:evelooment to the south, west, and nort~east, and a schoo'. ano c~urcn
to tnF north and ea=_t.
?:. Tnat the oroposed deletion of deed restriction= and tne attendant uses o: tne C-',
General Commercial, Zone woulo oe deleterious to the resid2ntizl integrity a;ready estab'.ietiec
in close oroximity to subject oroperty.
7. That the size and shaoe of subject oroperty maF:e it deveiopable :or a c-1ot sinole
farr.liy residential subdivision.
8. That althouqh business and professionzl uses were aoproveo ;'or subject property, it
nas not developed, and the size o: the parc2l is more suited `or develonment of znd R-I
tract with back up treetment alonq Magnolia Avenue ti~an develonment for more intense
commercial land u<_es. ~
9. Tnat one person appeared in oppositior, to .=..ublect oetition.
R 1-D 1
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for ReclassiEication be denied on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 23rd day of February, 1967.
~.
}~ /
~J 1 ~'-~~~ZL }~,.~ /~~~~.P ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO~
pro tem
ATTEST:
~ ~ - /,~- _ _ _ i ~1-, ~ ,-
~ SECRETARY ANAHEItd CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~I
~: ! STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
6; COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
~ ; CITY OF ANAHEIM )
f
;~ I~ Ann Kr ebs ~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
r) I going resolution wes passed and adopted a; a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
~. j February 15, 1967~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
~ ~
~ ~. AYES: COhiMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Mungall, Rowland.
~ i '
NOES: COMh1ISSIONERS: ~done.
I'
'r ' ~; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~amp, Herbst.
~ '.
'; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of February, 1967.
I
I
I :
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i" . ._ %
i- SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C0111MISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 3R
R2-D _2_
•~
';1 ~
i
~~
'1 p
[{ ~
~
5
C