PC 67-42RESOLUTION NO
PC67-42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT °22 BE GRANTED
: ~~$
~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim did receive a veriEied Petition for Conditionel
Use Permit from ORDER OF THE S~RVAW1'S OF MARY, 1952 Wes{: La Palma P.venua, ~.r:aneim, Ca'. ifornia,
Owners; WALTER A. FROME JR., P, 0. Box 2547, Ananeim, Californiz, Agent o; c~riain real prooert,
situated in th2 City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, de=_cri:~ed =__ the we=t
one-half of the Northwest quarter of the P!ortheast quarter of Section ~, Townshir;~ South,
Ran9e 10 We=_t, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, a=_ shown on a map thereof recorded in :o~ -, paoe 10,
hliscellaneous Mao=, records of szid Orange County. EXCEPTI!;G THEREFROh1 tne South . .'_et
thereof.
; and
' I WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the Ci[y of Anaheim on
r 2bruar y 2?, 196', at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been du:y given as required by
I law artd in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipa( code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence
I. for and egainst said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make finding~ end recommendations in connection
~ therewith; and
1VHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and
after due consideration of all evideuce and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following fects:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditionel .Use Permit is authorizad by this Code, to
wit: Section 1~.64.0?0(1-f) to permit the exp~nsion of an existinq ori~rate hioh ~...., .
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses end the g~oarth and development of
the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. 1'hat the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is edequate to allow the full development of the
proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular aree nor to the peace, health, safe[y, and generel welfare
of the Citizens of the City of Maheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditians imposed, if any, will not be detrimentel
to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. ?hat no one aoneared in opposition to sub ect oetition.
Cl-G _1_
i~ I
,1 j
j _ I
' Qi
~'i ~
i
i
Ff
~~
~4 • `
~
r.
i.~
~i4 ~
ii ~
F~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED tl~~t the Anahoin~ City Pl~nning Commission does hereby arant subject
Petition for Condltional Use Permit, upon the Eollo~in~ conditions whlch ~re hereby found to be a neeessary prerequisite
to the proposed u:e of the subjeet propetty in otda to preaerve the s~fety and gencral welfere of the Citizens of the
City of Anaheim:
1. That the owners of subject property shall de~d to the City o: Anaheim a strip of
land 27 feet in ~vidth, from the center line of the street, along Nlichita Avenue, :or street
widening purposes and terminating at the northerly end iri a 5C :oot rzdius cul-de-sac.
2. That the owners of subject property shail pzy to the City of Anaheim the sum of
$2.00 per front foot along La Palma Avenue, for street lighting nurpo=_es.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with a~proved olans on
file witn the office of the Director of Public '1Jorks.
4. That any air-conditioning facilities proposeo shall be properly shielu~_: :ron view.
5. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be compiied with c~rioi to the
time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of 1R0 days from date ~ereof, which-
ever occurs first, or such further time as the Comission or City Council may grant.
6. That Candition Nos. 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final
building and zoning inspection=_.
7. That subject oroperty shall be developed substantially in accordance v~ith :~lan=_ and
=pecifica±ions on file with the City oi Anaheim, mar4ed Exhibit ^]os. 1, 2, and 3, provided
however that a 3-foot strip of landscaping with protective curbing hose bibbs ond =_orin'r.lers
shall be provided in the La Palma Avenue setback, and thzt the new par~:ing area shzll con.`orm
with the landscaping requirements of the C-1 Zone.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is si~ed and approved by me thia trt day oi March. 19~~~.
~ /~
i~ . i~iCl` ~
~ G~
HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIGG COMMISSIO*1
ATTEST:
~
_ ~/ - t ~ . -~,~ ; ~ :,
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann iCrebs, Secretery of the City ~Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and edopted at a meetine of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on February 27, 19~~7~ at 2:00 o'clodc P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gautr. Herbst, Rowla~d. Camo.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ",one.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Munga] 1 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 9th day oi h;arch, 1_~b'.
~" r ~
C ~~ ~ •' - ~'~~"2_c !' ~ -
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ RESOLUTION NO. 42
a C2G _ 2.
_ , _ _ _ '.,;
~