PC 67-62RESOLUTION N0. PC 6%-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMTSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITIO~I FOR VAHIANCE N0. 1R64 BE Gr~Ai~ITED IIJ PP.RT
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cur,unission of the City ~f Anaheim did receive a verified
Petition for Variance from JOHN NUNEMAIuN, % STRUCK REALTY, 5C6 East Chapman, Orange, California,
92632, Owner; COVINGTO~ BROTHERS ~NSTRUCIIOA] COMPANY, R41 !Jorth Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim,
California, Agents of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, described as the West half of ~he South half of the West half of the
Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 26, in Township 4 South, Range 10 West,
:~ in the Ranr,ho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 51,
~ page 1~, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County
'~~
~~
,'S
;and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in
the City of Anaheim ~n March 27, 1967, at 2:00 0'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing
having been duly given as reauired by law and in accordance with the provisio~s o: the Anaheim
Municioal Code. Chapter 1R,dR, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed
~.ariance and to investigate and mahe findings end recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation. and study made by
itself and in its beha?f, and after due consideration of all evidence and reoorts of:°ered at
s~id heariny, does find and determine the followin9 :zcts:
:, That the petiiioner requests variances from the Anaheim Municipal Code to oernit
deveiopment of a 64-unit two-story apartment development as follolvs:
SECTION iR.2R.050(5-b) - Mar.imum permitted building heiyht, (1-story plus roo:
structure within 150 feet of R-A Zone permitted; 2-stories
plus roof structure proposed)~
SECI'IOiJ 1R,2R,050(6-•a-4)•- Ya:ds and buildina setbacks. (Building setback of 15 ;eet
required; setbacks of 9 and 12 feet proposed).
SECTION 1R,2R,050(11Z - P~alls. A 6-:'oot solid masonry wall is required along the
property line abutting the R-A Zone on the east and a portion
of the west; no walls proposed.
2. That the siz? and shape of the parcel is adequate to provide :or yards and building
setbacks reouired by the R-3 Zone, and therefore, the waiver of Section 1R.2R,050 (6-a-4) is
d•-nied on the basis that no hardship was proven to warrant said waiver.
3. That the req~ested waivers relating to building height and walls are warranted.
since thi= general area is designated on the General Plan for medium de~sity resideitia] dtvelo~ment.
4. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstan~es or conditions applicable
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to
the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
5. That the requested variance is necessary for the preserv2tion and en~ioyment of a
substantial property right possesszd by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied
to the prooerty in question.
6. That the reque=_ted variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property
is located.
7. That no one appeared in oppos~tion to subject oetition.
~- . - .;. - - ---
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thot the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Varianr:e, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be e necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the :subject property in order to preserve the sefety end general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
2. That thi= Variance is yranted subject to the completion of Reclassification No.
66-67-56.
3. That subject property shall be dzveloped substantially in accordance with plans
: and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6,
provided, however, that yards and building setbacks shall conform with the R-3 requirements.
~i€
ri
~; ; S
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me thi 6th day of P.pril~ 1967.
~~/~ ~ ~~
~.
CIFIAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN ING C MISSION
ATTEST:
.( /(~''~.7 _.j..l ,': ~l_`/~ /. `J ,
1 !
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of An.aheim, do hereby ceRify that the fore-
going tesolution was passed and adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
March 27, 1967, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst Mungall, Rowland, CamO•
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Non e.
ABSENT: COMB1ISSIONERS: ~on e.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of Apri:, 1967.
/ 'l z z ~ ~ f 2 /r ~%~ _~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM1IMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 62
V2-G
-2-
i
~