PC 67-67RESULUTIO~ ;~0. 67-•67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLAIvNID1G OOMMISSIOPI OF THE CITY OF ANA.HEIM AMEiJDItJG
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIO;~ OF PROFERTY CONSIDERED IN OJNDITIONAL USE PERNiIT
N0. ~iA3 DELETION OF C~JNDITIODI N0. 5 AND Ah1ENDMENT TO OJ'dDITI014
N0. 4 OF PLANNING ~hU`.9ISSION RESOLUTIOD] IvO. 66-73 DATED
SEPTEN~BER 12, 1966, THERL-TO
WHEREAS, the City Flanning Commission on September 12, 1966 at public hearing did
grant Conditional Use Permit No. R~3, subject to conditions and for the establishment of a
walk-up restaurant;
WHEREAS, revised development plans submitted indicate that the porcel will now be
"~ develooed with less tha~ originally approved, thereby necessitating a revision to the
~ legai description of Rasolution ido. bc-•73 dated September 12, 1966; and
f
' WHEREAS, Condition 'Jo. 5 of the a;orementioned x•asolution required a document to be
recorde-d guaranteeing mutuzl ingress and eyress, v;hich has be2n determined to be olacing
an unnecessary c:oud on the title of the property by the title company; and
~VHEREAS, Condition h:n. ~, if incorporated with develooment plans, l^:ill serve tne
' same purpose as requiring recordation o` the documeni as indicateti in Condition ido. 5.
NOW, THEREFORF., BE iT RESOLVED that the City ?lanning Commission of the City of
Anaheim does hereby amend Resolution ;b. 66-73 dated September 12, ?966 as ;ollows:
1. Amendment to the leo;] description or the property to read:
"That portion of real property situated in the City o: Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of Cali:o*nia, described as the westerly 100 ieet of the most
southerly 150 feet of Lot 34, o` Tract 'do. 4757, as per map recorded in Sook
1Rq, Paqes ~~ ano 4R o: Ali=_cel'.aneo~~=_ h~iaps in the oifice o: the County Recurder
of said County."
2~ That Condition ido. 4 be amendeo to read:
"4. Tnat sub;ect property shal! be aeveloped substantia_'_}- in accordance
with plans and saecifications, and plot plan, on :ile with the City o:
Anaheim marred Revision ;~oa 1, Exhibit ;~:os. 1 and 2; orovided thzt the
parkino layout .`or the proposed walk-up restaurant shali be integrated
into tne parking !ayout for the entire shopoi~q center, and that no wal:=_,
f2nces, or other ohysical barriars shall be con=tructed within the shopp-
ino :acility or within the premises o` the wal;-uo restaurant that wouid
restrict tnz :lor~ o.` vehicular traffic between the ozrkina arezs o: the
two ~acilities."
3~ That Condition [!o. 5 be del et2d.
THc FOREGOIPiG RESOLU?I0:1 is sianed and approved by m~ his oth day o: ., 967.
~ ~ l'-~/ ~~G~
i-{¢ AIRA'iA:~i Ab;AHEIM CITY PL ;d;;I::G Id~p7ISSI0~:
HTTEST:/ ' ., % --
• 1- ~
~~ ~ i_ f2 . !~~~
SECRET~RY A~JAHEIh1 CITY PLA~~i';I':G ~fa~.hSISSIO.'?
STATE OF CALIFORJIA ~
OJUt~ITY OF ORAKGE ss.
CITY OF AfdAfiEIh1 )
1, Ann Krebs, Se:.*ata.; o: tha ~ity Planninq Com~ni=_sion of the City of P.naheim, ao nereUy
crrti`y ihat the ioregoinq resoiution was qassed and adopted at a meeting o* the City Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on h,arch 27, 1967, at 2:00 0'cloc:r P.Ai., by the
fol?oviing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COF:~h~ISSIO:!ERS: Allred, Ga~er, Farano, Herbst, h9unqall. Rowland. Camp.
idOHS: CO~~J~IlSSIOiJERS: itone~
ABSENT: ~M[viISSIOI~!ERS: 'Jone.
I~1 WITDIESS ~iJHL'R60F, I have hereunto set my hand this 5tn day of April, 196'.
~~
. ~
*
~'
i % ,'~- /~
~•. L. ! vL , . ~
SHCRL-TARY A'~AHEIA1 C1TY PLAid'~JL~:G OJA1A9ISSION
a
t'