Loading...
PC 67-96RESOLUTION N0. PCG7-96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1873 BE APPROVED IN PART f '~ •~~ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Verience from FRANK SACKETT, % CARL COWLESs 106 West 4th Street, Santa Ana, California, Owner; CHARLES SCHLEGc] 433 West 8th Street, 5anta Ana, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the Cjty or Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full -, ; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the Ci:y o£ Aneheim on May 8~ 1967~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given as required by law and in acoordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68, to heer end consider evidence for and against seid proposed veriance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigetian, end study made by itself and in its behalf, and efter due consideretiort of ell evidence and reports offered 'at said hearing, does find end determine the following fects: 1. Thet the petitioner requests e variance from the Anaheim Municipel Code to permit a 42-foot high~ 450-square foot sign with waivers of: SECTIOIJ 18.62~090(B-1) - Maximum number of free-standino signs, (300-feet re- quired between .`ree-standing signs; 15~ and 173-feet proposed). SECTION lt3,o2-090(B-2) - Maximum oermitted sign heioht (25-feet permitted within 300-feet of single family residential zone; 42-;?et proposed)~ SECTIOfJ 18~62~090 B-4 - Maximum permitted sign area (350-square ieet oermitted; 451-square feet proposed)~ 2~ That tne petitioner ~as not proven a hardsnip v~ould exist i` tne maximum perTitted sign area was not grar.ted; therefore, waiver oi Section 12.52~090(B-4) is hereby denied, and development must ce v,~ithin the sign area standards of the Sign Urdinance~ 3. That beco~~e of the existence of the previously app-oved free-standinq signs on sub- ject property, some hardship would exist; therefore, the °ianning Commiss;on grants a height o` 30-feet for ihe proposed sign, provided ihat lighting oi the sign will be in ti~e ofr nosition when facing toward the multiple family area to the north and easto 4~ Tha' there are some exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appli- cable to tFe intended use of tne property, as appro••ied by this act=on, that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. 5o That the requested variance, as approved, is necessary for the preservation ar.d ?n- joyment of a substantial oroperty right oossessed by other property in the same vicin- ity and zone, and denied to the property in question~ 6o That the requested variance, as aoproved, will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located„ 7, That no one appeared in opposition to subject petitiono ' Vl _i_ ~ ~- T~~~ ~ ~ F.,! ;;4 ~ ~i ' rl ~'~ i ,~ ~,v . , ~ ' ~ ~\ ~ ~ ~ ,•y1ArZK0 c. F30TICH .,~r,c,v . '•'r~ YIN~[~I 11Y~~IC~N (N~TITYT~ O~ • . tNcw~~wr~-....., t l ~R ~ . c- PL^NN,~o ~~ C N O i N C C!I 1 fl O ~'• A R C H I 7 C C Y U q C C ~-ry~~ ~. D I V 1• 1 O N O/ ~`w, w~.4y'~' ' ' QVotn{ 0/~0~~~~~/ ~~..~.:,~. , r"'.~--. . . ~ ' ~i ~ „ . _.. . _„r, ~ ~..~"""~"'..^^ .r.~+....~..n.~ . +ww ` ' ~ . p /'.•"~ ' 1 OO~ ~ M~~ M~M~MMIMW\4n~~.~w~~..ruW~/.Ir4~~~/Y~~Iy ~~' h ~ C./~~.r~'-~~ ~~ i ~PaZCC~~~ ~ c~ ~~ ri{~v1'i 1 _/ ~~ ~ ~Ori. ,: ~, ' ;~ , ~ ,j .1 I ' J ~ :! i l `,i; r' ~ ~ ,. ~ - ~ * ~ ~i ~ I 1 '•~ ihati portion of lot 35 of 1-nnh~im ~xtenetox~ in thc City ofl Anaheim, ua shrnvn on a map of curvey madu by William Hnmol~ nnd ~ilcd for recor.d in rhe ~OFzicc of thu County Recordar of Loa lui~Qlc~ County~ Cali~ornia~ and being a portion o£ the eouthorly ziva and onn-hal£ nerae tnerco~~ deaoribed 4G follotas t Co,r.nencin~ nt n atalca marked S9,N,II. and 3i.C.IC. on tl~a Soucn linQ oP cection z~ine. in ~avnship 4 Sout1~~ Ran~e 10 Wear. San IIernardino Dase and ~ ~;eridian, tho sann bQing the oouthwea~ corner of o 20 acrQ'tiracr oi' land sold by D.67.C. Cowan to Dr. 4Jillium N. i(ardin, by dced recordcd in Dool< 3~i~ • Pagu 457, deeds. recordo o~ Los 11n~cl.en Counrj, CaliforniA. runnino~ t•'nence Nor~h.'1024.0 icati, morQ or lesa, ro un old c~~nor poat marlced H,C.K.; thence E~st. 363.7 rooi; thence S~uth. 1024.0 £eati~ noro or lecs, to the Soutn line o~ said sention nina; theneo Woat~ 363.7 feot to tho poin~ of be~innin~. catcep~Cin~ therei'rom~'that portion ne Eror~ted to tl~o State uf California~ by deedrFecordFd February 3, 1956~ in I3ook 33tDi~ Page 147, Ofr~cial ltecords. inL~-o 0",zcc o~ thc County Recorcler of Oron~e County, doscr~,bed ao Lol~o~v,,: $eginning a~C a 4 inci- by 4 ineh redwood nra;<e on thc: South line o~ said ccetion nine,29~~8.88 feet Easr oP ~he sauthweo~ corner oi Eaid sec~ion• tlence `or;.i~- lo G'10" i~loat, 184.40 feotj thencc Sour}~ 36~•• 48'S0" Eas~, 58.7'8 zee;,; thcacu South 56~ 30'38"~~¢er~ 70.45 feQt= the:ice 6outh 2-}~ 31'2" East 98.Oo feet; thence 6outh l0 7~50" Eust 50.00 fear ta u poin~C on the South 1ir-e oi eaid eaction; ~henee along said Sou~h l3ne, Sou~th 880 52'10" Wes~, 26.19 feet; ~hence conrinuin~ along evid South 1ine~ South 8(io 53'S!l" West, 129.42 feat to thQ point o~ bQginni.-~g. • • • . , ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ,. i! ~j . . ,•.. . ; Also exceptiin~ therofrom. 'thut portion doseribad as'foll.owc: ~ 13eginnfng a~ un old corner poa~ marked H.C.TC.; runnin~ thQnee East. 3G3.7 ~' ' ieet; thence South~ 365.30 fee~= thenae Wee~~ 363.7 fQa~; thence Nort'r-, 365.30 ~~ feor tio the pot»t of beginnir-g. Also excepting therefrom thnt portion lytng~nor~herly and oa3rerly oz ~he ~ • follawing deceribed line: . i; De~i~v--ing at a point lyint{ South~ 703.30 fao~ from an old oorner poct nar:c- ~ ' ed H.C.iC. i r~ul.~in~ thQace Eua~~ 140.0 SeQt; thaneo South, 14.OG feet; thence ' Eas~~ 223.7 ;:eQt to a poiz~t. euid poinr being Bast•~ 3G3.7 feo~ and Sourh, 717.30 ~ fec;. ~ror caid old corn~x ~oa~. .. ~ • • ; . . •~ , , ~ ,, , i r ' ,~_.'.,~~ _ '_.._,:,,,.,,s • . . . • ~ • . . - - --- r • i . • ~+-r~~r~v. ~ . , . ~ . „ , . . , - .. '~~ _ ~~~3 .. . ; ., . . .. ,. _. . . . . _ .. , __ __ -- - ~ , _ __ - -- - . .;.~r: = ~:.7r> S r in part NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant~ubject Petition For Verience, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro- • posed use of the subject pcopedy in order to preserve the saEety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 1, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, prov~ded howevex, that the maximum height shall be 30-feet, the maximum width shall be 16-feet plus or minus, and the maximum size shall be 350-square feet, as depicted on Exhibit "B"; and further provided, that the rotating portion of the sign shall be in an off position _ when viewed from the northeast quadrant, as depicted on Exhibit "B-1". THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 18th da'~ of May, 196'. .~ -~,( t-c.~G/' ~~ ~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI G COMMISSION ATTEST: / i • '~ /%~ [~ ." %'~.~..~. ~,~LC ~~j. SECRETARY .ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. ~ CITY OF ANAHEIM ) -•-~ I, Ann Krecs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore- going resolution wes passed end adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on A9ay 8, 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, F.4RAN0, GAUER, HEREST, MUNGALL, RO'NLAND, CAMP. NOES: COh1h1ISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENT: COMMiSSIONERS: NONE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this lSth day of A1ay, 1967, /- i ~ /.~~Z~G:-r !~~ „G:c`_,i~. SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 96 t!~ ~ > V2-G _2_ E:~ i - ~' ~' i ~~ . _ _ _.._. _._.....-_..____.. . -- , _ . ~ . ~