PC 68-1~.q ...... _.. . ...._._...
} _ __
~ESOLCrzor; n~o, Pcba.•i
A RES~LUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING CON~h;ISSIO~I CF ;Y.E CITY OF ANAHEIh~
RE~hiMENDING TO THE CITY ~UNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANA:~EIM A
STREET NAN;E CHANGE FOR THE ;:ORTH SOUTH PORTION OF
CERRO VISTA DRIVE TO CERRO VISTA VJAY„
WHEREAS, with the _nnexation of propzrty knowr. as the Peralta Hi.ls area, and the
o:ficial rumbering of streets in this area r.o:< being undertak=n by the Building Divi<_ion,
evidence was submi±ted that Cerro Vista Drive was both a north-south street snd an east~
;vest street; and
~~~ WHFREA59 the City Pianning Commission did sei for public hearirg ~onsideration of
a street name cnange tor the nor-h-south portion o; Cerro Vista D:ive to be renamed Cerro
Vista lM1ay; and
V~HF~ ~ASY the City Planniny Commission ald ho:d a public nearing a~ the City nali in
the City or' Anaheim on January ,i, i968y at 2~00 G c,ock P„~~;,.; r.otice of saTd publi:: hearing
having been duly yiven as required by law and ir, accordance ,vi[h the provisions of the
Anaheim Nunicipal Code, to hear and co~sider evider.~e for and against said proposed street
name change and to investigate and make findir,gs and recommendations in connectior. the=e-
xith; and
~VHFREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, ir.ves~igation and study made by
itself' and in its beha'f and a.`ter due consideration of a:l evidence an9 reports o:tereo
at said hearir.g, does r";na and determine the follo.ving f'acts:
1, ''hat •,vith the same st.eet r,ame ior both a north~south and east-west street;
some con:~sion nas resulted in regard to the as~i.qnment of street addresses
by the Buiidino Division of the Development S?xvices D~partment.
2. That botn the City's Fire znd Poiice Departments have indicated no orobiem
wiil exist if the north-south street is named Cerro Vista :"Jay.
3~ That the U. S, po=t pffi~~ !~,s 2~so ;.,.±a:a~-~ ~F.~` ~;a:a wou:u ue no probiem
if the street ~.vere renamed Cerro Vista Way .or the r.orth•-soutn portion~
NOW, ?HEREFORE, BE IT RESGLVED that the City Pianr.ing Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Cuuncil of tne City o`. Anaheim that the north••south portion of' Cerro Vista Drive
e~tending from Santa Ana Canyon Rvad to Per;lta Hil:s Drive be renamed Cerro Vista V~ay o~
the basis o: ihe fo:?going findinps. ~
:HE FOREGOIP,G RESOLUTION i~ ;igne~ ar.d approv~ ~ me [hi; li~ a o' ~nuary., i9oE,.
~{~ '~' ~~'.
~HAIRMAPJ AI~AHEIh1 CIIY ~L~ING CnhildiISSIOiJ
ATTEST: ~
,`~~ ~.-; r_%" ~~~.c_ !*`~
SECRETRRY ANAHEIM CITY PLAldNIP;G QOMMISSION
STATE OF CALiFORN[A j
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krobs, SecrA'ta:y o: the City Piarning Commission oi the City or' Anaheim do hereby
certit~ :nat the ~orego;r.g resoiu~ion r;a; passed and adopted ai a meetina oi the City Piannir,q
Commissior. of the C,~y of kn;neim, neid on January 35 i968~ at 2s00 0':iock P„M„~ b~~ the
i'oilo•~;ir.g vote o: the members thereot:.
AY£S: COh!"~4ISSIODiERS: A_:: e:, Gauer, Herbsty Mung~ti, Rowiand; Camo.
hOESe COMMISSIONERSa None,
ABSEMa COMMISSIODIF~tS~ Farano.
IN VlI2'NESS WHERcOF~ I nave hereur.to set my hand tnis lith day of' January9 i968.
//
G"C~?~.~~ ~~~~_ i
SECRETARY AD!AHEIM CITY PLANNING OJMMISSION
. ~
~
~
~
-- ..~>. .
~