Loading...
PC 68-114RESOLUTION NO PCoB-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF TNE CITY Od~ ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1971 BE APPROVED IN PART iTM~ ~ ~~ ::~ .~ ' ~. , ~~ , ~ i I ~. `. `I _ `, I Y+c. t~Y ~ ` :j.~~.~.. 1 #Y; ~ 1 I _ . ~''~~;~:~~'~ * ' at:: ~.'t 3~.~ ~ „+. ,' ~ _~ _'~~. "LtEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition foc Va:iance t;om DOYLE 8 SHIELDS REALTY' COMPANY, 1333 South £uclid Street, Anaheim, California 92802, Owner; KEN CRANE ANHHEIM, INCARPORATED, 916 South Euclid Street, Anaheim, California 92802, A.gent of certain real prooerty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described a~ Lot 16 of Tract No. 2534, as per map recorded in Book 115 pages 15 and i6 of Miscellaneous lulaps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. EXC~PT ±he north 130.00 feet there~f, ALSO EXCEPT that portion thereof Tying South of a line that is oarallel with and 200,OG Feet noi•therly. measured at right angles from the centerline of Ball Road as said centerline is shown on ;aid map ~ ~ - ; ar.d WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public hearing et the City Nell in the City of Anaheim on April 22, 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P,M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in acrnrdance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for and against said prcposed variance and to investigate end make findings end recommendetions in connection the:ewith; and 1VHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered ~ seid hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipel Code, as follows, to permi.t thc replacement of an existing free-standing siqn with a la*ger sign: SECTIO~ 19 62 090(B-1) - Number o,` free-standin siqns ermitted. (One sion per- mitted for earh 300 feet of frontage; two siqns orooosed within approximately 250 feet of eacn other), ~~ SEGiIO[J 18.02 090(B-2) - Heiaht of fr?e-standinq sions. !A maximum of 25 feet _ permitted when within 300 feet of a residential zone; 36 feet proposed). SECTION 18.62.090(B-4-a) - Area of free-standino siqns. permitted; 444 square feet proposed)mum of 350 squzre `eet SECTION 18.62 090(B-5) - Location of free-standino sions. (Signs are required to be located within the center 20% of the parcel frontage, which would require that the sign be located no closer than 120 feet to the north orooerty line; petitioner proposes to 2. That waiver of the numberlofafreehstandingosigns toUOermitttwonsignsPwithinY250nfeet of each other is herby granted, on the basis that two _°ree-standing signs already exist on the oroperty, and the petitioner only intends to reolac? one of the existing signs. 3. That waiver of the location of free-standing signs to permit location oi the replacement , siyn at the existing location is hereby qranted on the basis that the location o:° the new sian would not be changed from the location of the old sign. 4. That waiver of the heiyht and the area of a free-standing sign is hereby denied on the '. basis that the petitioner stioulated to revising the sign plans to conform with the height and ` area provision of the sion ordinance. ; 5. That one person appzared in opposition. i •~ S n ~; i ~-~ . ~ ~ 1' in part , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby grentlsubject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are haeeby found to be a necessary prerequisite to Fhe pro- posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and generel welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, Revision No. 1. ~ . iY ~s s I .• F THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is aip~ed ~nd approved'oy me thie 2nd day of May, 1968. i i ' '~ ~ F ~~'` ~ ~~ 1~ ~ iil'~y " CnRiR;+S.'+;: ,`.;7:~EIEIb7 C;TY PLANNING COMMISSION '~ PRO TEM ATTEST: ~ ''~ i i ~~, G~ ';~ - ~7~L-~2i /'l"cF'~L~~ ~'~~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ ;~ ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ' ,'; ' COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa. i ,`~ CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ~" I, Ann Krebs, ;? Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on April 22, 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: ~i2 :~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall. ~ ~ ~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~on e. ~ ~ I:; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp. Rowland. ( ;f . :~ ;5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto aet my hand this 2nd day of May, 1968. ,t .e '~ (/ ~~ /G~ ~2 ~ ~L-'Z~-- ; ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION .j `'~ RESOLUTION N0. 114 ~ ; V2-G a ; -2- ~ ~ .. ~-~s-.~ntw,~.~,, _ --•w:.,, . ,} ; };~. . . ~ ' ' ~ ,n