PC 68-115!
~
~ s
R,.r,SOLUTION N0. PC68-11~
A RESOLUTIO:~; OF THE CITY PLANNING COM~dIS5I0N OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RE~MMENDIAiG
TO THE CITY OJUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AiVAHEI~4 THAT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
N0, 100 BE DISAPPROVcD
jT~~~ ;~,;
4
}
„\ ~ ~'
1 '
. I
I I
~~
i
':'~I
r'.; ,
,•. i
~
->~' .I
[ I
i::` .
;. ~ ;'
. ~~
r~ _ ,
-1 ~~
. N(V.~ ,I yu~ I~
• ' +
~i
~
~
J
r~ '~y~~
~`;;~,
~
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did adopt a General P1an by
Resolution No. 63R-869, showing the general description and extent of land uses within
the City and indicating the oresent belief of the Counci,l as to possible future development
and redevelopment of land within the City; and
4YHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a veri=ied
Petition for Reclassification No. 67-68-72, which petition has implications on policies
as expressed on said General Plan; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the notice of the hearing o~ said reclassification, notice
was also given regarding ihe consideration of an emendment to the Gene:al Plan in the
general location and vicinity of subject oroperty of said reclassification; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in the City Hall ~n
the City of Anaheim on April 22, 1968, at 2:00 0'clock P,M., notice of said oublic nearing
having bee7 duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the
Anaheim Mu;iicipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said Amendment to
the General Plan and said proposed Petition for Reclassification to investigate and m~ke
findinqs and recommendations in connection therewitn; and
WHEREAS, said Commission after ~ue insoection, investigation, and study made by
itself and in its benalf and a:ter due consideration of all evidence and reoorts offered
at said 'nearing, DOES HERF~Y FI;~ID
1. That the present general description and extent of land uses in the aforementioned
area adequately represents oast and current City policies regarding possible
future develooment of said general ;;rea described as:
That area oenerally bounded on the north by the Orange County Flood Control
District Channel,on the south by Orange Avenue, on the ~est by Dale Strc~et,
and on the east by a point aopro>;imately 166 feet west of Shields Drive.
2. That no evidence was presented at said hearing which would justify the City
Planning Commission recommendin9 a change in the above mentioned oolicies
to the City Council.
3. That Exhibit "A" of General Plan Amendrc~ent No. 100 does not constitute an
acceptable alternative to current policies as illustrated on the General Plan.
4. That 6 persons appeared, representing 15 persons present in the Council Chamber,
all in opposition, and one person appeared in favor of a General Plan Amendment.
t
~i : .~L'
'j ~ ~
t
~ r
};
~
~
~ ~*
) !
Si'. ~ _7~ i
a;~..:~ ; ~
zf ,
- . , " :.,.
~ . ---
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Ci±y Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim does her.eby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject
General Plan Amendment be disapproved on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOIhG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 2nd day of May, 1968.
~ ZG~I LlG
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~NiMISSIO~
ATTEST: PRO TEM
i
~~~~ ~~~
SECR~1'ARY ANAHEIM ~ITY PLANNING COMTdISSION
STATE OF CALIFOR~IIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on April 22, 1968, at 2:00 0'clock
P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall.
NOES: COMh9ISSI0NF~2S: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of May, 1968.
_C~~.~~ ~~n~-~-
SECRHTARY ANAHE M CITY PLANNING ~N:NISSION
Res. No. 114
~
~
~