Loading...
PC 68-124RESOLUTION N0. P~68-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETIT?ON FOR RECLASSIFICATIQN N0. 67'68'79 HE APPROVED tion fromHCALIFORNIA1FEDF~2AL SAVII~GS1ANDf LGr;N~~ASSOCIATI0N,a5670~Wilshire BoulevardReLosSAngeles, California 90036, Owner; COVINGTOt4 BROTHERS ~NSTRUCTION ~MPANY, 2451 East 0*angethorpe, ..':~~ Fuller~on, California 92631, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Couniy ~~ a of Orange, State of California, described as the VJest half of the Southeast quarter of the Sou~h- •~ east quarter of Section 12, Township 4 So~th, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as shown ~.\ j~ on a map thereof recorded in book 51, pa e 11 Misce I EXCEPTING THEREFRONi that portion described as~followslanB~inning~atethedSo~theas'~er~lyncornernof. i', said West half of the Southeast qnarter of the Southeast quarter; thence North 0 0 05' 04" East I along the Easterly line of said VJest half of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, ! 586.66 feet; thence West parallal to the Southerly line of said West half of the Southeast qu~ta ! of the Southeast quarter, 190.46 feet; thence South 586.66 feet to a point in the Southerly line ~ c; said Section, said point being 189.60 feet West of the Southeasterly corner of said West half ;~• of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quar.ter; thence East 189o6Q feet alono the Southerly line of said Sec~ion to the ooint of beginning. EXC~PTING ThEREFROM the South 40 feet thereof. ~;~j ALSO EXCEPTIVG THEREFRON~ that portion included in Tract t4oa 3007 as pages 33 and 34, Miscelianaous Maps, records of said Oranqe County. P~ mao re~orded in book 89, ' I ~ I , i I ; end ,, i WHEREAS, the City Plenning ComR,ission did hold a public hearing at the City Hel! in the City of Anaheim on : May 6, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearinQ having been duly given es required by -~ -1 law and in accordence with the provisions of the Aneheim bfunicipal Code, Chapter 18J2, to heor and consider evidence ~, ~ - far end egeinst seid proposed reclassificetion and to investigate and make findings end recommendations in connection ' . i ' therewith; and • i ; WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itselE end in its behalf, and i efter due consideration of ell evidmce end reports offered et said heering, does find end determine the following facta: ; 1. That the petitioner proposes e reclessificetion of the above described property from the C-1~ General i Commercial, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone. ~ 2. That the scope of the proposed reclassificat:on does not warrant an amendment to the General Plan at the present time, however, its relationship to the General Plan symbol will be 'I considered at the next annuai review. 3. Thet the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessory and/or desicahle (or the orderly and pro- per developnscnt of the community. 4. Thet thn proposed eeclessification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses loeally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted usea Qenerelly eetab- lished thsoughout the community. 5. That the proposed reclassification of ~~,;bject property requires the dedication and impi•ovemeni: of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which wi11 be generated by the intensification of land use. 6. That it has been determined throuqh discussions with the Traffic Engineer that the planter proposed in the center oftn~ ~ui-~---sac would not intei~fere with tne movement of venicles; and that since such a landscape treatment weuld provide additional aesthetic appeal, the Planning Coamission recommends to the City Council that the proposed planter be approved as a part of the development plans. 7. That one oerson appeared representing :our qersons present in the Council Chamber in opposition to any circulation for the proposed development thru the single family subdivision to the north. ~ •~,::s'M~'- f.. .I` ~ . ~\ ~ ~ : j i I , ;; . `I ~ NOW, ~EREFORE, HE 1T i.. ALVED th~t th~ An~hNm City P1~nAia` „ommisalon doee hereby recommmd to thc City Conecil of the City o( M~b~im that subj~ct PWtion for Recl~s~i$c~tton be approved ~nd, by so doing, th~t Title 1&2onin~ oE the M~h~lm Iilunic3p~l Cod~ ~~mendad to exclude the ~bove described property from the C-1, General Commercial, Zone, and to incorporate said dPSCribed into the R-3, Multi'ple Family Residential, Zone upon the following conditions which 2re hereby found to be a necessary pre- requisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general :~welfar e of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. `• 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land, as shown on Exhibit No. 1, for La Reina Street. 2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Lincoln Avenue and La P,eina Street, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the Cfty Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file Cityhof~AnaheimfshallCbe postedew thathetCityato~guaranteeatheninstallationaofssaid~engineering r equ ir em ent s. 3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Lincoln Hvenue and La Reina Street, tor streeL lighting purposes. 4. That the owner of subject property sh~ll pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Lincoln Avenue and La Reina Street, for tree planting purposes. 5. That the ou~ner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 6. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the C~ty of Ananeim for approval and then be recurded in the office~of the Orange County Recorder. 7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. B. That lots may be developed on an individual basis provided, however, that La Reina Street has been dedicated and fully improved. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this/ 16th day of May, 196E, ~ ~ i~-~ C~---~-~ i CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLA NING COMMISSION ATTEST: ~ , i[.~~ Z a . C . ...;~ '7~ ~ ~~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sg, CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, da hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on May 6, i968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, PAungall, Rowland. N~FS: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~amp, Farano. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 1968. RESOLUTION N0. 124 R2-A ~ i ,- - f ~~ ~L "i-~. ; ~_ - `~~2c_ ~~ -, . SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -Z- ~ ~