PC 68-127RESOLUTION NO. ~~8'12~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1974 gE GRAi!T£D
i
i~
~ S
~
:; . :~
: ~
. 1
•.~1.°I
s:' -+
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from
WALTF~? q, GOODEN AND PAUL PLETZ, 1222 West Lincoln A.venue, Anaheim, California 92805, Owners;
CAVINGTON BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 2451 East Orangethorpe, Fullerton, California 92631,
Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
~alifornia, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as thouyh set forth
in full
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
May 6~ 1968, at 2:00 o clock P,M., notice of said ublic hearin hevin been dul
law and in accordance with the provisionsrof the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and cons der evidence or
and against said proposed variance and to investigate end make findings and recom mendations in connection therewith;
and
~VHEREAS, said ~ommission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and efter due consideration of all evidence and reports oifered as said hearing, does find and determine the following
Eacts;
1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim M11unicipal Cod~, as follotvs~ t0 esteblish a 76
unit multioi~ family apartment complex on subject prooerty.
SECTION 18~_?_8,050(3-a) - Minirnum floor area of dwellina units. (A minimum of 700
square feet required; petitioner proposes to develop 425
square foot, single (bachelor) apartment units on a oor±;on
o= ~iie propertyj.
SECfION 16_28.050(9-b) •-• hi3ximum distance of a livin4 unit from a standard street.
(A maximum of 200 f e~~ p~rmitted; 300 feet proposed)o
SECTIO:'J 18~28.050~10-a) - Minimum r~quired number of covered oarkina soaces. (95
covered soaces reouired; 76 covered soaces and 35 uncovered
spaces oroposed).
2. That there are exceotional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the
propertv or r,lass of use in the same vicinity and zone.
3~ Tnat tne request2d •darian~e is r.e~es;a.y ior the preservatior, and enjoymer,t oi a sub-
stantial property rignt poss?ssed by other c;roperty in the same vicinity and zone, and ~~enied to
the property in question.
4~ That the reyuasted variance „~iil not be materially det:imental to t;.a public weifare or
~o~a~~~us to the prooerty o* improvements in such vicinity and zone in which ihe property is
5. Tiiat althouqh 42% of the units are proposed as sinqle (b~chelor) apartments having less
'~han the minimum permitted square footaye per unit, the overall density (35.4 dwelling units per
net residential acre) and coverage (44%) is less than the maximum permitted in the R-3 Zone;
therefore, the requested vaaiver of minimum floor area per d:velling unit is granted based upon
recognition of the fect that now there may be a demand for smaller, high quality apartment units
for single people, and that the Pianning Commission has initiated studies to determine whether
the Anaheim Municipzl Code should be amended to permit a certain percentage of this type of unit
in multiple famiiy developments.
6. That the proposed development may be considered as an extension of the olanned residental
development concFpt, but since no other provision is made .`or such a development, the variance
procedure is being used to examine the rierits of individual proposals and it is the Commission's
opinion that the proposed development meets the basic intent and criteria for development of the
property wt,ich has been deemed necessary in the pzst.
7. That subject prpperty is z difficult parcel to develop, and the waivers qranted under
this petition should in no way be construed to be es±ablishing a precedent for such aoproval on
other parcels throughout the City.
8. That it has been determined throuqh discussions with the Traffic ~ngineer that the
planter proposed in the center of the cul-de-sac would not interfere with the movement of vehicles
and that since such a lzndscape treatment would provide additional aesthetic appeal, the Planr,ing
Commission recommends to the City Council that the proposed planter be approved as a part of the
development plan.
*'
„tx
'
~
rt
i
\ ~ r
.)
I `
~ -I
. VC51e@:
~'%+UL ~-i. : ~ETZ and CL~ilA M. PLETZ, husband and wife,~ ~as ,~oint tenant-s,
as to an undivided one-half interest and Ulalter A. Gooden and Eva R.
Gaoren, hiisband and wife, as community property, as to an undivided
one-::alf interest.
`~ ~° f?.
Tne land re(erred to in this report i, in the slate o( Califomia, county ol Orange `~ ~' +~
.; ,r.
~ ';~
, ' ~ `r .
SEE r,X'riI3IT "A" ATTACHED ~ ;'j '.
SUBJcCT TO
1• '~axes for L'ne fiscal year 1968-69, a lien not yet payable.
2. Second installment of taxes ior the fiscal year.1967-6~, $1,077,39~
coverin~; said land, and other land.
3. A ti•~aiver of an,y claim for~ dama~;es to said land, by reason of the •
construction of a central dividin~; strip in the highi~~ay ad,joinin~;
on L-he North, as disclosed by a deed from Ida Losleben to the State
of California, recorded Augus~ 30, 1955, in book 3193, page 95,
O~ficial Records.
~1~
'~I
. ; '
~
~ i ~
_- ''
1
-- ~,;."~
[continued]
P•lIL•A.fl Inav. 7•W) . ~ .; ~~`
, ~ , :/. ..../._9.7 ______.. ~
_ _ ... ------~------
_.._.__ ... _..___.._,.____.__.__..
E%iiIE3IT ~~~~~ ,___._~_~-__...-------~~ ......_..._.. ._
I'
That port:Lon of LoL- ; o; ilelen anci i.,;~nei~';, Subc;ivision of' a portion
Or t}lC ~'iC^ut one-hal; Oi SCC~].Otl ~.?)~ ~il 10:':i1St",].~1 ~I ~ipU~}~~ j;~ipr(~ 1~
:•;est, in the Rancho San Ju«;-, Cajon cie Santa Ana, in Liie C1Ly of
Anaheim, as snoti~m on a nap thc;~co: :~ecorr.eci ~n boo]•: 51, 7a~e ?~ e;,
seq., i~ilscellaneous i~ian~, record; of caid Oranjr,e Cotint,y anc3 as shown
on a mnp thereo(' recorded in bool•: llrl2, nZ~;e 15~3, Deeds, records o:
Los An~;cle; C~,iinr.,y, Ca] i.~ or~iiia, ue:,criber, as folloors:
I T3e~;in~tin~~ at a point 3211.46 1'eet ?9e ;t of the Plorthel:~t corner o^ tiie
i Northeast quarter of the Northi•rest quarter of t;he North~~rest quarter,
of saici Section 16, and runn:in~; thence South 661,h9 feet Lo a poin~
~ on the South line of said Northeast• quarL-er 335.57 feet Ga,;terly
~': from tne I~lest line of said Nort-heast quarter, said point bcin~* thc
tr~te point of beginning of the boundar,y of the land hereln described•
' tnence t~lest along said South line 335.57 feet; thence ?dorth alon~; ~
' ~ said l~lesL line 300,00 feet; thence East parallel to said South line
135.~~ fcet to a point on the SouL•herl,y prolon~ation of t}ie i~lest line
o° the land described in that certain memorandun of lease recorded
Au~us~ ~;, 1966, in book 8009, pa~;e 9112, Official Records of said Orange
County; ~hence :1ort;h 72.92 feet to L-he South~vest corner of ~he land
describecl in said memorandum of lease; Lhence i;ast along L-h~ South
line o: L-ne land described in said mernorandun of lease and al.on~
tiie South line of the land describeci in a memorandum of lear,e recorded
i~ay 7, 1.9G5, in book 7512, pa~;e 702, Official Records of said Oran~e
County, 200.00 feet to the East line of the land described in the
de~d to Paul ti. Pletz and others recorded in boolc 4339, pa~;e 415 of
O~fic~al :~ecords of said Oran~e Count,y; thence South alon~ said East
line 372.9z feet to the true point of ~eginning. ~
~
NOTE: Said land, with other land, is described on the Count,y Tax Assess-
~t ment Roll for the fiscal year 1967-68 as A. P. No. 12y-O11-16; CA 1-022.
E
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to fhe pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safEty end generel welfere of the Citizens ofthe City of
Anaheim:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No,
67-68-50.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office of the Director of Public Works.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the
Chief of the Fire Department.
4. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final
building and zoning inspectionso
5. That subject property sha11 be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit hlos. 1, 2, and 30
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION la sigaed end app~ved by me thia 16th day of May, 1968.
i ~
1 ~
, -~c..' /f yv.L~
~CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ _'~"~ ~.
( ~ ~ .~~i.. .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certiEy that
the foregoing reso'. ._~n wes ~assed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on May 6, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote o( the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSI0NER5: Allred, Gauer, Mungall, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: E~erbst.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~amp, Farano.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 16th day of May~ 1968.
RESOLUTION N0. 127
V2-G
f ,~
~ ~Z z . , z_ ~Z.< l_ ~ ~,_,
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
~
r