PC 68-132RESOLUTION N0. p~F~"'132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COM111ISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1983 BE DENIED
,
ji,
:~ j ~
~
i
~ ~
i
I
~ I.
~~
'~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from
TEXACO, IIJNRPOR.4TED, P,O. Box 817, Wilmington, C~lifornia 90744, Owner; SEARLE USARY, 1001 fdortn
State College Boulevard, Anaheim, California 9280b, Agent of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as that portion of the SouthAast
quarter of Section 2, Township 4 South, Ranae 10 West, in tt~e Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana,
as per map recorded in book 51, page 10, M~scellan eous hiaps, in tne office of the County Recorder
of said county. Beginnina at the Southeast corner of said section, ther~ce i~orth i~~ 53'^-5" West
203,00 feet along the £ast lin oi said section; thence YVesterly 3?_6.~7 ;eet parallel n~ith the
> Southerly line of said se~tio,~; thence South 0 53°~5" East 203.00 f eet to said Soutneriy line;
; thence Easterly 326.6% feet along said Southerly line to the point of beginning, ?ess ~t,e v:esterly
':. 108.67 f eet therefrom
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
May 2C, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.A1., notice of said public hearinq having been duly given as required by
law and in acrnrdance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith;
and
WFiEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does Eind and detertnine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code as follow=_, in order to ;;erm:t the
outdoor storage of rental truc::s and an excessive number of rental trailers on subject property.
SECTIOi~I 18.08.330 Par. 4 - Definition of automobile service station. (A r..aximum o:
10 rental trailers oermitted on any on? sit~; r~;±,~_~~~~
is presently storing and propose= to continue to store
approximately 20 rental trailers on subject oroperty).
f
tf '-
t •
~ ...
, 1
~~~ ~ ~
; i
~ ~~~. ~
SEGTION 18.08.330 Par. 5 - Definition of automobile s~rvire statior., (Ir.cluoed ;~~ithin
the definition of automobile service station is the statement
that "all painting, body and fender repair, tire re::apping,
and the rental of other heavy equipment, and the saie and
rental o` other merchandise other tnan sp~:i;ir:; ar,o.e, i~
excluded"; petitioner proposes to store and rent heavy equip••
ment ihat is not included in the list of permitted uses `or
service staiions).
SECfION 18.4C~04U - Outdocr uses. (The outdoor storage of renta] equinment is
not a permitted outdonr use in the C-t Zone).
2. That there are no ex,eptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions a'PD~1CdDj2 to
the property involved or to the intended use of the orooerty that do not apply gener=lly to the
property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
3. Tnat the requesied variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyrnent of a
substanti.al property ~~~ht possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and deni~d
~ to the property in question.
, a. That the requested variance wi11 be materially detrimental to the pubiic ~.a~elfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which tFe property is
located.
5. That no evidence was presented ~hat indi.cated that the provisions of the Anaheim ~J~unicipal
~ode vaere deterring the efficient use of subject prooerty, nor ~vas there any demonstraiion that
a hardsnip exists that would justify approval of the reauested ~vaivers.
6. That the petitioner was storing equipment on an R-A parcel adjacent to subject property
for which no permit has been granted.
1. rhat the staff was directed to study the :easibility of amending the service station
standards to include the storage of trucks in addition to trailers, with a certain maximum
number of pieces of equipment being permitteci depending uoon the size of the parcel and their
location.
~i
, ,,
. ]~
;~~ ~ -
,
"i
,
.;
,
~
~.
~.
~1
;.I
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Variance en the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 315t d:~y of hA=y, 1°08.
-~lL~.c,J • ~• i= ~
, ~•v
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~4~~~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann KTebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby ceRify that ihe fore-
going resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
hlay 20, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock p,M,~ by the fo:lowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, hlungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3: st day of Iv1ay, 1968.
C /~~a~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 132
V2-D
.Z.
~
r