PC 68-133RESOLUTION N0. p~o8-133
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNlNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 198?_ BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petiti~n for Variance from
TEXACO, INCORPORATED, P. 0. Box 817, Wilmington, California 90744, Owner; W. B. USARY, 100 South
Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, Cali•:ornia 92804, ", ent of certain real pro erty situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Californ~ia, described as the SouPh 150.00 feet of the North
216 f eet of the West 190 f eet of Lot 4 in Block A in Tract blo. 13, as per map recorded in book 9,
oage 12, Miscellaneous Maps, said North and West distances being m easured to the centerlines of
the streets adjoining said lot on the North and West. FJ{CEPT that oortion thereof described as
~~1~ follows: Beginning at a point on the Dlortherly line of said land Easterly 60 feet :rom the IJorth-
,i west corner thereof; thence Westerly along said p~_allel line to s~id Northwest corner; therrce
Southerly along said West line to a line oarallel with and Southerly 20 feet from said 'dorth line;
~~ ' thence Easterly 40 feet along said North ~line; thenca Northeasterly on a direct line to the point
~ ;S of beginning
i
1
~ I.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
May 20, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M11., notice of said public hearin havin been dul
law and in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,68, to hear and cons der evedence for
and against said proposed varience and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection iAerewith;
and
R'HEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself end in its behalf,
and efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and detertnine the following
fact~:
1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Aneheim Municipal Code as follotv,, in order to permit
the outdonr storaoe of rental trucks on subject propert~~:
SECTI0~1 18.08.330 (Par. 5) - Def~~ition of automobile service station. (Included rrithin
the definition of automobile service s+ation i= ±~;., ~±z~~T~~+
that "all painting, body and fender repair, tire recapping,
and the rental of other heavy equipmeni, and the sale and
rental of other merchandise other than specified above is
excluded"; petitioner proposes to store and rent heavy equip-
ment that is not included in the list o:° permitted uses :or
service stations}.
SECTION 18.40,040 - Outdoor uses. (The outdoor storage of rental equioment is
not a oermitted use in the C-1 Zone).
2. That there are no exceotional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not aoply generally to the
p~•operty or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
3. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment o; a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied
to the property in q~iestion.
4. That the requested variance ~vill be materially detrimental to the public ~rrelf~re or
injurious to the prope*ty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is
located.
5. That no evidence was presented that indicated that the provisions of the Anaheim PA~icipal
Code tivere deterring the eff ecient use of subject p:operty, nor was there any demonstration that
a hards.iip exists that would justify approval of the requested waivers.
6. That the staff was directed to study the feasibility of amending the service station
standards to inciude the storage of trucks in addition to trailers, ti•rith a certain maximum
number of pieces of equipment being permitted depending upon the size of the parcel and the
location.
7. That one person apoeared in opoosition.
V 1-D,
-1-
~
~x
~
~
~ r
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Pl~nning Commisaion doea ~reby deny subject
Petition for Verionce on the basis of the eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this , 31st dsy~ of May, 1968.
/
~ , _ i ' s ' aL.
~HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
L~'/!%N/n/ ~~~~~~G~o/
SECRETARY Ai~AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHE'M )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify qhet the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
May 20~ 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock p.M„ by the foilowing voteo{ the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungal?, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 31st day of May, 1968.
~~~ %~~" ~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNWG CO-4MISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 133
V2-D
-2-
~
~