PC 68-151RESOLUTION NO. PC68-•151
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1954 gE GRANTED
WNEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition fo~ Variance
from CLIFFORD C, BOTTEfvFIELD, 732 No East Street, Anaheim, California 92805, Owner; A~ £. SANDORF,
1327_4 Newport Avenue, I'ustin, California 92680, Agent nf certain real orooertv situated in the
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Calif. 'escribed as that portion oiLotl oiEnah a un
Extension, as shown on a map of survey made by William Hanel dated llecember llY 186ts, signed by
N, Robinson, Trustee, and filed in the office of the County Recorder of Los Annales Co Rt ,
Beginning at a point in the westerly line of said Lot 1 distant thereon South ~5~~~ 3~' ~ast 150
feet from the Southwest corner of the land conveyed to ~ialbert A. Granam and wif e, i.~y deed re••
corded December 30, 194'7, in book 1611, page 155, Official Records, and running ther~ce South
15~22'30" East along the westerly line of said Lot 1, 75 feet• thence North 73~55'20" East 2~0.81
f eet; thence North 15022'30" West parallel with the W esterly~line of said Lot l, 75 ;eet, thence
South 73°55'20" West 270.81 feet to the point of beginning.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on June 3, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.hl., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissinn, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and detertnine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code as rollows, to oermit tn;>
cnnstruction of a s?x-unit apartment complex on suLject oroperty.
SECTION 18.28.050(11) - Required walls. (6-foot masonry wall required where a multiale
.ami y resi ential zone boundary abuts a s ngle-fzm:ly *esidential
znne; no ;~~?~ ls ~roposed a'_o^g t`,c norti~ or souti; property lines
o` subject prop~erty).
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substential property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfate or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
5. T~at since subject property is orooosed to be developed in accordance with the "Specific
Plan of Access", any required wall along the north boundary would be located in the middle o.`
a.`utur~. mutual accessway; and that since the oroperty immediately to the north and south of
subject property have a resolution of intent for R-3 Zoning, it was determined that no wall
would be ner.essary alonq the north and south boundary.
6. That the oetitioner withdrew the original request to reclassify subject property
to the R-2, Zone after the Planning Commission recommended to the City Councii that subject
and abutting properties be aporoved for R-3 Zonino under Reclassi`ication ."I~, 67-08-68.
7. That 4 persons aopeared in opposition to the oriqinal request for waiver of the
height limitation and ~he wall requirement; however, revised plans ornject single-story
construction, therefore, this ~Nai~•er was no ].onger necessary.
Vl-G _1
~I
~
~
' ` 7
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
posedou eo`oE thensubjeet pcope tyiin~order toitprese ej heTSafetyb nd Q nenl walfue oE ~he p~~tequisite to fhe pro-
Anaheim: Cltizene of the Clty of
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification tJo. 67-68-68,
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1 Revision No. 1, and in
accordance with the "Specific Plan of Access" as adopted by the City Council.
;I
r~ -
. .~ ~
~'
+;: '; I '
~ ii`;:: ~ 1~
~z, ~
~`=;- „~x
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is aigned and aPproved by me thj3 13th day of June, 1968.
/
~~-w~ / ~-~
/C~AIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PI~ANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: '
~%'~ ~ ~ /
~~2~ .G:~_~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Sectetery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anahein, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission o( the City of Anaheim,
held on June 3, 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano Gaue: •
~ ~erbst, Mungall, ~amp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 13th day of June, 1968.
L ~~-'2 ~- ~ ~ ' ~"IL' G~ ,
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 151
V2-G
.2.
qi` ;
~ ~
-~~
~`-'i
r'~:S'
a.,...7
~~ ~
~ ~~~
~
~
,~.+.r~- ~,~."'~~,~.,,
- +~"7~~ '.-''~°' -
~
n