PC 68-171RESOLUTION N0. PC-68-171
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING ~MMISSIOPd OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY ~UNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 1'HAT AREA DEVELOPMEIvT PLAN
N0. 89 BE DISAPPROVED
WHEREAS, as a result of the City Council's adoption of "A'6tudy of the Problems of
Residential Homes Fronting on Arterial Streets", the Planning Commission initiated General
Plan Amendments, Reclassification petitions, and Area Development Plans to implem ent the
conversion of the 17 areas designated in the fTont-on study from residential to office
and prof essional or general commercial.use; and
WHEREAS, Area Development Plans are designed to assist in providing secondary or
additional circulation to those properties fronting on arterial streets which have been
considered appropriate for conversion to commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did A~.ld a public hearing in the City Hall in
the City of Anaheim on June 3, 1968, at 7:30 o'clock P.M.~ notice of said public hearing
having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the
Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed Area
Development Plan, and to investigate and make findings and recomm endations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREqS~ said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study mad e by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reoorts offered
at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. I'hat subject property is comprised of eight parcels, a service station, six
low-density, single-family residential homesites and a low-med~um density
multiple family residential homesite.
2. The surrounding land uses are the Savanna High School site to the north,
the City Municipal Golf Course, multiple :amily residential development
and a commercial apartment-hotel and restaurant ta the east, low-density
single-family residential homesites to the south; and a morturary and
Savanna High School to the west.
=~ I
~ ;; 3. That the Traffic Engineer has indicated that the present daily vehicular
traffic count on Lincoln Avenue, a major highway, is 25,000 automebiles
'~ _ and is projected to carry 31,200 vehicles per day within ten years; and
~ that Gilbert Street, a collector street, presently carries 6,600 vehicles
I per day and is projected to carry 8,400 vehicles per day within ten years.
•I
'; 4. That there is no secondary vehicular access (alley) to any of the properties;
j and that cormnercial mning would normally require either secondary vehicular
i access or par~ing at the rear of the properties, if the lots were to be developed
1 for commercial uses.
~~ ! 5. That all of thE lots, except the large 1.4 acre parcel, which extends through
- ~ to.Lincoln Avenue, would have lot depths reduced from 132 feet to 120 feet
~ !' after ultimate dedication on Gilbert Street thereby reducing the front yard
~ setbacks to as little as eight f eet.
' I 6. That the Planning Commission deems the large 1.4 acre parcel and the smaller
, ~ R-A lot imroediately adjacent to the east and north as being potential commercial
since commercial uses.have been established to the east and west; however, the
i remaining 5 R-A parcels sho.uld be retained in their present land use designation
' on the basis that the properties to the east have been developed for multiple
~ i family residential purposes and the size, and shape as well as orientatian of
! ~ these lots makes them more desirable for residential development.
f ~
~' 7. That since the Area DevelopmeZt rlan was designed to provide secondary circulation
I, primarily for those lots fronting on Gilbert Street, and the Commission has
, proposed deletion of 5 of the 6 parcels from the Front-On Study, the remaining
parcels can provide their own circulation because of the size and shaoe of the
parcel, therefore the Plan is not necessary, and the Commission recommends
;;;~ disapproval.
};
?:,: : ~
A
ak~ ~ '
~ ~f ~
~
n
. _ ~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City planning Commission does hereby recommend
to.,the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Area Development Plan No. 89 be disapproved
on the basis that secondary circulation can be provided on the parcels approved for re-
classification, and on the foregoing findings.
.~~
~- ~
~~
', \ I
i
~
' i
• `
t• I
,,.
,: \
t - ~~
~ : I(
~ . I~
r ~ ;. ';
.k, '
1
h:;~+. .
, i~Y'.'
~~, ,; !
~
p•, 1
i
F~ `
C. ~
S"'i w
~ '
{<. ~
:1
::~
y:, ,
'~. ~
~~
r }~i:
THE I~REGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 13th day of June, 1968.
y~ ~
HC AIRMAN AHAHEIM CITY PLANNING Mh1ISSI0N
ATTEST:
% ~,
~ 72 L2-~ ~~,~"c:,v'
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~MMISSION
STAI'E OF CALIFORNIA )
~UNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I., Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adooted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on June 3, 1968, at 7s30 o'cloc: P.M.,
by the following vate of the members thereof~
,4YESs COhAMISSIONERS: Alred, Farano, Her.bst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOESs OJMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENTs ~MMISSIONERS= Gauer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of June, 1968.
/~~ /~ ~ ,
L-'<- "?'~ 7> ~i~l~c.~~-a
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~M~ISSION
Res. No. 171
C
n
~
~ #