PC 68-173r
' l
R~SOLUTION N0. PC68-173
A RESOLUrION OF THE CITY PLANNING ~MMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RENMMENDING
TO THE CITY ~UNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHHIM THAT AREA DEVEI.OPMENT PLAN
N0. 90 BE DISAPPROVED
WHEREAS, as a result of the City Council's adoption of "A Study of the Problems of
Residential Homes Fronting on Arterial Streets", the Planning Commission initiated General
Plan Amendments, Reclassification petitions, and Area Development Plans to imolement the
conversion of the 17 areas designated in the front-on study from residential to office and
professional or general commercial use; and
WHEREAS, Area Development Plans are designed to assist in provid:ng secondary or
additional circulation to those properties fronting on arterial streets which have been
considered appropriate for conversion to commercial uses; and
`~t WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in the City Hall in
' the City of Anaheim on June 3, 1968, at 7:30 o'clocF~ P.M., notice of said public hearing
~~ having been duly given as required by la~v and in accordance with the provisions of the
~`~ Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed Area
Development Plan, and to investigate and make findinqs and recommendations in connection
- therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission after due insoection, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideratipn of a11 evidence and reports of:ered at said
hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That subject property is comprised of seven pzrcels, all develoned with low
density single-family residential homesites.
~ 2. That surrounding land uses are low-density, single-family residential home-
sites to the north and east; a small commercial comol.ex, service station, and a
low-density, single-family residential homesite, to the south; and property
in the County of Orange which is presently developed as an orchard, but has
been commercially zoned to the west.
` '. That the Tra.fic Engineer has indicated that the present daily vehicular
~ traffic count for Broadway, a secondary highway, is 7,000 automobiles and
is projected to carry 8,900 automobiles per day in ten years; and that
Broo!-hurst Street is pr esently carrying 33,500 vehicles per day, and is
projected to carry 42,500 vehicles oer day in ten years.
~~ 4. That the primary vehicular access, except from the easternmost
'`~ to Broadway, and none of the parcels have any secondary vehicularTeccesss
';`~ ~a3}eys).
i `
' .;q 5. That all the lots have a deoth of 100 feet, and said depth would be reduced
;# to 95 f eet aft
er ultimate dedication of Broadway for street widening and
thus the front yard would be reduc
d f
~
! e
rom the present 20 feet to 15 feet.
Furthermore, the rear yards, wh~re parking is required in the C-0 Zone
•~
,
are t~o shallow to oermit parF:ing unless the existing structures were
i I ; removed.
6. That since the vehicular traffic along Broadway is considerably less than
• that projected for secondary highways; and due to the fact that pat~king
t
o the rear of the residential structures would be minimal unless an alley
`
~ were required, making it necessary to remove the existing structures, the
proposed reclassifi
ti
ca
on would be unf easible.
~
I ` 7. That th e Commission recommended that the reclassification
t
b
d
~ and that after considerable testimony and discussion, together
with
a field
~
inspection of th
e property, that the size and shape ur the lots, evan after
ultimate dedication, makes them suitable f
i
pr res
dential retention.
~
~
~
~
~
k' ~
}'~~ ~~ . -~-..- .
i~.;: , ~„~~ .
-~~~ • --- _. , ~. ` _
~~~ ~
~ ~
~`: -
~ -~
,
'* NOW, THEREt~URE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Area Development Plan NP, 90
; be disapproved, on the basis that the proposed increase in land use, necessitating
secondary circulation, is premature, and based on the foregoing findings.
J -,;
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 13th day of June, 1966.
~._.[./~v' ~'~ -, ,
ATTEST: CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN ING CO MISSION
(~~~/ZZ- ~_2~'~~ ~i ~i.>/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLAN^]ING ~MMISSION
;
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
~UNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim do
hes eby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopt,:d at a meeting of the
~ity Planning Commission of the City o° A.naheim, hcld on June 3, 1968, at 7:30 0'clock P,Pd.,
by ,the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: ~MMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
DIOES: COMMISSIOPIERSs None.
ABSENTa ~MMISSIONERS: Gauer.
IN WITNFSS WHF.EtEOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of June, 1968.
~~~~l.t=: ~"'t ~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
`?";`" • { ` Res. No. 173
'~>1' ;;
~~?~;~,, . 3
~Y•1 '~
bµ'~,
4 M+~`'~:: +
~ ' ~'^ ~
, 3t.. ~~' l .l'
~ ~ ' ,S
;~~ = ~
•~ ~1~~:' ~ :E
~ 1 `~ ;s
~-. ~ ,,
~~i~
YN~ ~ j
1~ t I •
}'.~ 7
et ".
~-- E ~
~ _ ^~,-~~,._:~ ,
~
. , ~
- - ~-,.~~ -
~
~