PC 68-184t~r~;
~ri_.
~;~: .
~~i':
~~,
Rr
~';',
~
~
,ti
~
RESOLUTION N0.
PC68-184
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMi~ISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITIOPi FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 67-68-99 gE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did in i t i at e a v er i f i ed p et it ion f or
rec.iasaification on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though
set forth in full
~'• ~~~4 Propertv owners
~ .f.
Paul Lindstrom
~' ' 1821 Lemon Terrace
Santa Ana, Calif. 92705
' Milton Booker
417 S. Euclid St.
Anaheim, Calif. 92802
A. B. Cox
505 S. Euclid St.
Anaheim, Calif. 92802
Isabella Raith
405 S. Euclid St.
Anaheim, Calif. 92802
Nlayne Gough
421 S, Euclid St.
Anaheim, Calif. 92802
Russell Gray
~09 S. Euclid St.
Qnaheim, Calif. 92802
Joe Lemons
1808 Chalet
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
` t ; and
: i
;~ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing st the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
;` ~ June 17~ 1968, at 2:00 o clock P.M. notice of seid ublic hearin havin been dul
~ P g g y given es required by
- ~' ~' law end in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
-~ for and against said proposed reclassification end to investigete and make findings and recommendations in connection
. therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself end in its behalf, and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing. does find and determine the following facts:
1. Thetthe Commission proposes a reclassification of the above described property from
the R-1, One Family Residential, and R-A, Agricultural, Zones to the C-1, General Commercial,
Zon e.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in conformance with the General Plan as depicted
in General Plan Amendment No. 58.
;a 3. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessary end/or desirable for the ordedy and pro-
I j per developnrent of the community.
~° 4. Thet the pcoposed reclassificetion of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
~± uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones end their permitted uses generelly esteb-
~ lished throughout the community.
5. That subject property is one of 17 areas geographically dispersed throughout the
~ community which met the criteria for potential conversion to commercial uses as adopted in
~ "A Study of the Problem of Residential Homes Fronting on Arterial Highways".
a 6. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication and
~ + improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General
~ Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensification
, ~ of land use. •
~~ 7. That three persons appeared representing 12 persons present in the Council Chamber
~ in opposition, and that one person appeared presenting a petition signed by twelve persons
"'~ in favor of sub'ect
] petition.
R-A -1-
Y --^~r.•r.4~.:_..._ I ",.. . : - , . e
C .
- a
~ ~
~
I
~
:1 ;I
',1P1,,,,~ ~ , .
\~~.~,~ ' ......_c _! ~ .. ~US
,r--
~.
~ ~~~'w r
. ~ ~`~~~iE i%,.
~'o : Z~ :'_ :y Division •:~ ~~ ~t
._..~~~~i~:: C'.^.arlas i~l. Roberts ~s~
_ ro::: :~_;'r.~ o~ i~7ay ar.d Land Section
:~: ~~~:.1 D~scription =or zoninc ac~ion, Reclassification 67-68-99,
::esc_ibad as ~ollows: - -.-
~ _.,_._ _ -_..-~.....,-.
-:<:t :~o'_'cio.^. o~ ~l:e Soatheast cuarLer of the \Tortheast quarter of Sec-
~ ~'_C:; =i~ 1'v`.~'::S:llt~ =i~ SOUL~'1~ i~2uI1~C-' lO Sh'~5~~ $,$,$, & 1~.~ czescribed dS ~
_..__J`.i5: ~
~- -...•-rg a~ ~ne \or~n~aest corr.~r o= Lot 72 of Tract ATo. 2402, as shown
c:JU :;a_ recorded in•Eook 79, ;~ages 37, 33 and 39 of Miscellaneous ~aps,
;~co_csJo= Orar_g~ Co~:n~y., Caliro~rnia; ~nence South 89° 02' S0" Eas't
-i00 ~~:.~, nore cr less, alcng the _vortn line o~ Lot 72 of said Tract
_~.-:,. 2=:~2, co a:: ir.tersec:.ion wit'r. a line parallel with anci 50 fee't V;est-
..,yo u~ ~i~:a cen~~rlir.e o~ Euclid S~reet; thence Soutn 0° 32' 15" <<'est
~ i~~.=,7 L~:2'L~ :iipY~ OY 10SS~ u10:1eJ ~i:~? Zc'.SL Iri~ritlOP.C'C~ p3Yc']Zlel line t0 an
i°:L~rsec ~io^. ~ei ~h L"n~ \ortherly 1ir.e o~ Lot 77 of said Tract i:Q. 2402;
3 •- •...° :~ortn 31° 59' 20" ~r7est 100 ~~e~; ;~o-re or less, along the North
__..:-: c~= Lo~ 77 0~ said Tracr No. 2~02 to ine Northwest corner therwf,
sa'_ci ?~:cr~:n•,~s~ corner ~alsc being ~ne Soutneast corner of Lot 53 oi said
~'rac~ 24-02; ~.henc~ \or~h 0° 32' 15" East 121.59 feet, more or less, along
~~:e Easc 1_:?~: oi saia Lot 5~ ar.d the East line of Lot 54 of said Tract
3=:02 ~c ~:~a ~or~n~ast corner o~ sai~ Lot 54, said ATortheast corner also
a~:~;,c, ~^e Sou~heast co~ner of Lot 5~ oi se.id Trzct 2402; thence North
~° ~`•' 19" [^:est 330.97 fee't mo•re or •less a1
~ ~ , ong tnc East line of said
~ ~~o~ ~5 a^u ~"r.e Eas~ iinc of Lois 56, 57, 58 and 59 of said Tract \'o.
` %=;u % ~o ..:^.e ~ortheast corner of said Lot 59, said Northeast corner also
::i'c 'c::e Sou~.heas~ eorner o~ LcL 'u0 0~ said•~Pracc 2402; thence North
23`' G3' ~2" ~~s~ 69.39 ~ec~, mo~~ or i~ss, to the Nortneast corner or
~aid ~o~ 00, said ~ortheast COTrivY aisc being the Southeast corner of
- ~oi. ol oT said Trac;. \o. 2402; tnet;ce \orth 0° 32' 15" East 277.33 feet,
,;; ...or:: or l~ss, alon~ the East~rl,~ lir.e o~ said Lot G1 and the Easterly
;3 I 1,~:e o:: Lots 62, G3 and 64 of ~aid Traci: 2402 to the point of beginning.
~~- ...~.... -~--r~
; ;~T.r.: . ;,;y
~ ,„;~;
; ,,~.},,; ':x,
e.. ~
~~~~`:~' ~~~
' ~:.;F'~ :::~
~~. ~:~~~;~ ;;~
~~~ 7 T
~V
'~..c . ~ I }.'
~'
. I r
~ w !
I ~
r
e`~ .: ~'
.. ty~E:_.~~
'~~'T: ~1
~ a ~ I
i .
tZy~~'~' ;
tlk,. _
k`` 'i i;.
1 ~
?'~'i':' ~ . , ~.",~
~
~~ ' ' ._.. . -.. ....__ ../ ~ ~ • ~. " . ~ ,
t • ~~`,
~ ~
f
"~ -
~. c \ i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED th~t the Aaeheim City Plaaniee Commiseion does heroby recommend
to the City Council of the City ot An~heim :iut ~ubJect Petitioe for Recl~ssi8cation be approved and, by so doing,
that Title 18-Zoaing of the Anahetm Municip~1 Code be ~mend~d to e:clude the above described property from the
R-1, One Family Residential and R-A, Agricultural, Zones and to incorporate said described
property into the C-1, General Commercial, Zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby
found to be necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve
the saf ety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1~ That the owner of subject prop~~ty shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53
feet in width from the centerline of the street along Huclid Street, for street ,-~ider.ir,g p~poses
2. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings to Euclid
Streets shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
3~ That the owner of the two southerly parcels which comprise the southerly 450,77 feet of
subject area shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot aiong Euclid
Street, for street lighting purposes.
4. That secondary circulation =~;,i1 be provided in accordance with Area Developmeni Plan
No. 95e
5. That any driveway depression and/or apron not to be used along Euclid Street shall be
removed and replaced with curb and gutter and sidewalk, as required by the City Engineer and in
accordance with standard plans and soa:ifications on file in the office of the City Engineer.
6. That trash storaqe areas shell be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office of the Director of Public Works.
7. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded :rom view, and
the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes.
8. That all external lighting shall be directed downward and away from abutting parcels.
9. That any structures which are proposed fo: conversion from residential to commercial
uses shall be brought up to the minimum standards of the Uniform Building, Plumbing and
Electrical Codes, as adopted by the ~ity of Anaheim.
10. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a beriod
o: 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
11. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
12. That ordinances reclassifying subject property shall be adopted as and when each oarcel
is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel; provided, however, that the word
"parcel" shall mean oresently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by
the City Council for a lot split.
13. That a preliminary title report shall be furnished for each property that is not a lot
of a recorded tract, prior to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning said oroperty, showing
legal vesting of title, legal description, and containing a map of the property.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ie signed end approved by me this 2iin day or June, 1968.
ATTEST:
af-2 -l L~L~
CHAIRMA ANAHEIht CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PRO TEfd
~ 7~ yr~"/ ~i`i,~ ~~L-~ /
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certiFy that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on June 17, 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., 6y the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ~auer, Herbst, Mungall, Allred.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Uon e.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Camp.
ABSTAIPd: ~MMISSIONERS: Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereuato set my hand this 27th day of June, 1966.
~ ~;;
~~~ ~ ~".~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY. PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1B4
R2-A _2_
~
n